Will 6 January report end Donald Trump’s 2024 run?
New findings dent former president’s chances but commentators see some support rising among his base
 
Donald Trump’s chances of another tilt at the presidency have been called into question after he was accused of a “multi-part conspiracy” to overturn the lawful results of the 2020 White House election.
In an 845-page report, the 6 January committee claimed the then president failed to act to stop his supporters from attacking the Capitol.
The panel, comprising seven Democrats and two Republicans, studied “interviews from more than 1,000 witnesses, information obtained from millions of pages of documents and the contents of 10 public hearings”, said Fox News. It found that “the central cause of 6 January was one man, former president Donald Trump, who many others followed” and that “none of the events of 6 January would have happened without him”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
 
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The report suggests criminal charges against him and “also recommends barring Trump from public office in the future”, reported the BBC.
But could the findings actually boost his standing among some of the electorate?
What did the papers say?
The report “should, and must, prevent those who tried to overthrow our government from ever serving in it again”, wrote Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, for NBC News, and “that starts with Donald J. Trump”.
The conclusions “are damning, no doubt”, agreed James Matthews, US correspondent of Sky News, but their “significance” is “again the stuff of partisan political knockabout”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Nevertheless, whether the Department of Justice acts on the committee’s suggestion of criminal charges or not, Trump is “damaged,” added Matthews, and the report is “not what he needs as he seeks traction towards a political comeback”.
The controversy “adds another new wrinkle” to Trump’s standing in the Republican Party, wrote Ronald Brownstein for CNN. Veteran conservative strategist Bill Kristol initially felt that “a backlash from rank-and-file GOP voters against any indictment might boost Trump” but now believes it will “only compound the sense he carries too much baggage to win another general election”, added Brownstein.
As for Trump himself, he has “defiantly slapped down” the committee, said the Daily Mail, and warned that the development will only make him stronger among his base.
“These folks don’t get it that when they come after me, people who love freedom rally around me,” he wrote on Monday evening on Truth Social. The former president added that “it strengthens me”.
What next?
The committee has sent its report to the Department of Justice, which can recommend criminal charges. The suggested charges include obstructing an official proceeding of Congress, conspiracy to defraud the federal government, making a false statement, and inciting, assisting, or aiding and comforting an insurrection.
However, noted Fox News, the committee’s “unprecedented criminal referral” holds no official legal weight, and a “final determination” in whether to pursue the charges will be up to Attorney General Merrick Garland and the justice department.
According to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, “no individual who engages in insurrection or rebellion against the Constitution after having previously sworn an oath to support it can hold any federal or state office”, wrote Bookbinder.
However, he added, many states have their own procedure as to how this should work, either through the courts or through elections officials, “so they might not all enforce any constitutional disqualification for Trump”.
The committee has also begun to release hundreds of transcripts of its interviews, noted USA Today. One of them is with former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, who “described in vivid detail Trump’s efforts to influence the election results and indifference toward the violence as it occurred”, it said. Public reaction to the details of the support will influence his prospects.
The report is not the only controversy whirling around Trump. The release of his tax returns indicate that he paid “little or no income tax between 2015 and 2020”, and in 2020 “paid nothing at all, claiming huge business losses”, said The Times. The revelation will be a “potential blow to Trump’s coveted image as a hugely successful businessman” and “certain to overshadow his bid to retake the White House in 2024”.
 
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books. 
- 
 Should Labour break manifesto pledge and raise taxes? Should Labour break manifesto pledge and raise taxes?Today's Big Question There are ‘powerful’ fiscal arguments for an income tax rise but it could mean ‘game over’ for the government 
- 
 Nigerian Modernism: an ‘entrancing, enlightening exhibition’ Nigerian Modernism: an ‘entrancing, enlightening exhibition’The Week Recommends Tate Modern’s ‘revelatory’ show includes 250 works examining Nigerian art pre- and post independence 
- 
 To the point: the gender divide over exclamation marks To the point: the gender divide over exclamation marksTalking Point 'Men harbouring urges to be more exclamative' can finally take a breath – this is what using the punctuation really conveys 
- 
 What does history say about Trump’s moves in Latin America? What does history say about Trump’s moves in Latin America?Today's Big Question ‘Bitter memories’ surface as the US targets Venezuela 
- 
 Is the ceasefire in Gaza really working? Is the ceasefire in Gaza really working?Today's Big Question Neither Israel and Hamas has an interest in a full return to hostilities but ‘brutally simple arithmetic’ in region may scupper peace plan long-term 
- 
 How are Americans bracing for the end of SNAP? How are Americans bracing for the end of SNAP?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Millions depend on supplemental federal food funds that are set to expire this month, as the government shutdown begins to be acutely felt 
- 
 No Kings rally: What did it achieve? No Kings rally: What did it achieve?Feature The latest ‘No Kings’ march has become the largest protest in U.S. history 
- 
 Push for Ukraine ceasefire collapses Push for Ukraine ceasefire collapsesFeature Talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin were called off after the Russian president refused to compromise on his demands 
- 
 Trump eyes regime change in Venezuela Trump eyes regime change in VenezuelaFeature Officials believe Trump’s ‘war on narco-terrorism’ is actually a push to remove Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro 
- 
 ‘Social media is the new tabloid’ ‘Social media is the new tabloid’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day 
- 
 How are ICE’s recruitment woes complicating Trump’s immigration agenda? How are ICE’s recruitment woes complicating Trump’s immigration agenda?TODAY’S BIG QUESTION Lowered training standards and ‘athletically allergic’ hopefuls are hindering the White House plan to turn the Department of Homeland Security into a federal police force