Blaming the victim: has Amnesty gone soft on Putin?
Recent report on Russia’s war in Ukraine has seriously tarnished good name of human rights organisation
It was a black day for a onceunimpeachable human rights organisation, said Mychailo Wynnyckyj in the Kyiv Post. Amnesty International has a long and illustrious record of standing up for the victims and the oppressed. Yet on 4 August, it published a report on Russia’s war in Ukraine which has seriously tarnished its good name.
The report is essentially an indictment of Ukrainian forces: it accuses them of putting “civilians at risk” by setting up bases in cities, of turning schools and hospitals into military targets by operating weapons systems from them. “Such tactics,” it said, “violate international humanitarian law.”
This provoked a furious backlash. Oksana Pokalchuk, the head of Amnesty’s Ukrainian team, quit in protest, saying the report had become “a tool of Russian propaganda”. President Zelensky accused Amnesty of “shift[ing] responsibility from aggressor to victim”. How could Amnesty end up blaming the victim, Ukrainians must be wondering, when Russia is so clearly the guilty party. How could it have been so one-sided?
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A ‘simple’ explanation
The explanation is simple, said Paul Taylor on Politico (Brussels). Amnesty has “relentlessly criticised Moscow’s war of aggression”, documenting assaults on civilian areas, “gathering evidence of war crimes”, denouncing Russia for blocking humanitarian assistance. But any reputable human rights group must apply “consistent standards” to all parties in a conflict; and this report – the product of weeks of research – does just that.
Amnesty hasn’t been accused of any “specific errors or distortions” in its dossier, said Ewa Siedlecka in Polityka (Warsaw), and it stood by its findings, even while acknowledging the “distress and anger” they have caused. Rightly so. Human rights groups don’t exist to publish “war propaganda”; their purpose is to establish and tell the truth – however “uncomfortable” that may be.
‘Blind’ to realities of war
Maybe so, said Yulia Latynina in Novaya Gazeta Europe (Riga), but this report is almost wilfully blind to the realities of war. Ukrainian forces are operating in towns and cities not out of disregard for civilian lives, but because those are the areas under attack. And far from “hiding behind civilians”, as Amnesty seems to suggest, Ukraine’s military has gone to great lengths to evacuate civilians from conflict zones.
This report, woefully “short of context and explanation”, does Amnesty a disservice, said Clara Ferreira Marques on Bloomberg (New York). It’s a clear “propaganda win” for Putin, but a disastrous own goal for the organisation, whose work is vital to upholding human rights and promoting justice. “All the more reason to do it right.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Ukraine: Donald Trump pivots againIn the Spotlight US president apparently warned Volodymyr Zelenskyy to accept Vladimir Putin’s terms or face destruction during fractious face-to-face
-
The UK-made Storm Shadow missiles Ukraine is using in RussiaThe Explainer Ukraine reportedly deployed the long-range British missiles this week, following a tense meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump
-
Proposed Trump-Putin talks in Budapest on holdSpeed Read Trump apparently has no concrete plans to meet with Putin for Ukraine peace talks
-
Sanae Takaichi: Japan’s Iron Lady set to be the country’s first woman prime ministerIn the Spotlight Takaichi is a member of Japan’s conservative, nationalist Liberal Democratic Party
-
Can Gaza momentum help end the war in Ukraine?Today's Big Question Zelenskyy’s request for long-range Tomahawk missiles hints at ‘warming relations’ between Ukraine and US
-
Remaking the military: Pete Hegseth’s war on diversity and ‘fat generals’Talking Point The US Secretary of War addressed military members on ‘warrior ethos’
-
US tipped to help Kyiv strike Russian energy sitesSpeed Read Trump has approved providing Ukraine with intelligence for missile strikes on Russian energy infrastructure
-
Russia is ‘helping China’ prepare for an invasion of TaiwanIn the Spotlight Russia is reportedly allowing China access to military training

