Blaming the victim: has Amnesty gone soft on Putin?
Recent report on Russia’s war in Ukraine has seriously tarnished good name of human rights organisation

It was a black day for a onceunimpeachable human rights organisation, said Mychailo Wynnyckyj in the Kyiv Post. Amnesty International has a long and illustrious record of standing up for the victims and the oppressed. Yet on 4 August, it published a report on Russia’s war in Ukraine which has seriously tarnished its good name.
The report is essentially an indictment of Ukrainian forces: it accuses them of putting “civilians at risk” by setting up bases in cities, of turning schools and hospitals into military targets by operating weapons systems from them. “Such tactics,” it said, “violate international humanitarian law.”
This provoked a furious backlash. Oksana Pokalchuk, the head of Amnesty’s Ukrainian team, quit in protest, saying the report had become “a tool of Russian propaganda”. President Zelensky accused Amnesty of “shift[ing] responsibility from aggressor to victim”. How could Amnesty end up blaming the victim, Ukrainians must be wondering, when Russia is so clearly the guilty party. How could it have been so one-sided?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A ‘simple’ explanation
The explanation is simple, said Paul Taylor on Politico (Brussels). Amnesty has “relentlessly criticised Moscow’s war of aggression”, documenting assaults on civilian areas, “gathering evidence of war crimes”, denouncing Russia for blocking humanitarian assistance. But any reputable human rights group must apply “consistent standards” to all parties in a conflict; and this report – the product of weeks of research – does just that.
Amnesty hasn’t been accused of any “specific errors or distortions” in its dossier, said Ewa Siedlecka in Polityka (Warsaw), and it stood by its findings, even while acknowledging the “distress and anger” they have caused. Rightly so. Human rights groups don’t exist to publish “war propaganda”; their purpose is to establish and tell the truth – however “uncomfortable” that may be.
‘Blind’ to realities of war
Maybe so, said Yulia Latynina in Novaya Gazeta Europe (Riga), but this report is almost wilfully blind to the realities of war. Ukrainian forces are operating in towns and cities not out of disregard for civilian lives, but because those are the areas under attack. And far from “hiding behind civilians”, as Amnesty seems to suggest, Ukraine’s military has gone to great lengths to evacuate civilians from conflict zones.
This report, woefully “short of context and explanation”, does Amnesty a disservice, said Clara Ferreira Marques on Bloomberg (New York). It’s a clear “propaganda win” for Putin, but a disastrous own goal for the organisation, whose work is vital to upholding human rights and promoting justice. “All the more reason to do it right.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
6 peaceful homes near small towns
Feature Featuring doors with local topographical maps in Oregon and a 1850s homestead-turned-house in Vermont
-
What would happen to Earth if humans went extinct?
The Explainer Human extinction would potentially give rise to new species and climates
-
The best TV shows based on movies
The Week Recommends A handful of shows avoid derivative storytelling and craft bold narrative expansions
-
Trump threatens Russia with 'severe tariffs'
speed read The president also agreed to sell NATO advanced arms for Ukraine
-
Trump U-turns on weapons to Ukraine
Speed Read Unhappy with Putin, Trump decides the US will go back to arming Ukraine against Russia's attacks
-
Ukraine scrambles as Trump cuts weapons deliveries
Speed Read The halting of weapons shipments was driven by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, a Ukraine funding skeptic
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?
today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
Why are military experts so interested in Ukraine's drone attack?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The Zelenskyy government's massive surprise assault on Russian airfields was a decisive tactical victory — could it also be the start of a new era in autonomous warfare?
-
Ukraine hits Russia's bomber fleet in stealth drone attack
speed read The operation, which destroyed dozens of warplanes, is the 'biggest blow of the war against Moscow's long-range bomber fleet'
-
Putin talks nukes as Kyiv slated for US air defenses
speed read 'I hope they will not be required,' Putin said of nuclear weapons on Russian state TV
-
US, Ukraine sign joint minerals deal
speed read The Trump administration signed a deal with Ukraine giving the US access to its mineral wealth