What Netanyahu’s ‘spectacular’ return means for Israel
Alliance with the far-right risks doing serious harm to Israel’s standing in America

Benjamin Netanyahu has sealed a “spectacular comeback”, said Sheldon Kirshner in The Times of Israel (Jerusalem). Israel’s fifth election in just over three years was widely viewed as a referendum on the “fitness to govern” of the country’s longest-serving PM; and the answer was clear.
Netanyahu, the leader of the Likud party, had lost his 12-year grip on power in 2021, when opposition parties joined together to forge a coalition to oust him.
But the agreement was always fragile, and collapsed in June. That led to last week’s elections, in which Netanyahu, who is on trial on criminal charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust, “roared back to power”. Together with his allies, he won 64 of the 120 seats in the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, to defeat caretaker PM Yair Lapid and his “rainbow coalition of centrists, rightists and leftists”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It means Netanyahu and his allies – “a mixture of secular Jewish nationalists and Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox parties” – will be governing Israel within weeks. The gridlock that has been “paralysing” our politics in recent years has ended, with a decisive shift to the right.
One of the most right-wing governments in history
To the far-right, in fact, said Anshel Pfeffer in The Spectator. Netanyahu has ruthlessly courted political “fringe players” such as the homophobic Noam party, and the extremist Jewish Power. The latter is led by Itamar Ben-Gvir, a convicted racist who was for many years a “political untouchable”.
As a “young extremist firebrand”, he threatened the former prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin, shortly before his assassination by a Jewish extremist in 1995. He was an activist in an anti-Arab party that was outlawed as a terror group, and he still espouses hardline views. Yet Netanyahu accepted him as “a legitimate political partner”, helping catapult his party into the mainstream.
Now, Ben-Gvir wants to be put in charge of Israel’s police, as public security minister – yet just days ago, he was “brandishing his gun and urging Border Police officers to shoot at Arab stone-throwers”, said David Horovitz in The Times of Israel. And although Netanyahu has struck a moderate tone since the election, the “mainstreaming” of Ben-Gvir, and Netanyahu’s other new allies, means Israel is on track for one of the most right-wing governments in its history.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Liberals only themselves to blame
Well, that’s democracy, said The Jerusalem Post. There was “no hung jury”; Israelis were clear that they wanted Netanyahu to return “as the head of a very right-wing and religious government”. And you only have to look at the last government to see the importance of giving people what they voted for. That was led by Naftali Bennett, whose party won just seven seats in parliament, meaning he was dogged by questions of legitimacy throughout his short tenure; Likud has more than 30 seats. Ben-Gvir’s pitch of “restoring public security” clearly resonated with the public, said Melanie Phillips in Israel Hayom (Tel Aviv).
Fed up with an “establishment that appeared sluggish, incompetent and in thrall to liberal activist judges”, people voted for change. Liberals who are now “clutching their pearls” at the rise of the Right have only themselves to blame for creating the vacuum in which the likes of Ben-Gvir could thrive.
This election could have far-reaching consequences, said Neri Zilber in Foreign Policy (Washington). The Israeli Right has been vocal about its desire for “legal reforms” in recent months. These include steps that would “undermine” the supreme court, and would give the government a freer hand to build West Bank settlements, deport migrants and limit minority rights. “Not coincidentally”, such reforms could also halt the trial of Netanyahu, who maintains his innocence.
His alliance with the far-right risks doing serious harm to Israel’s standing in America, particularly when there’s a Democrat in the White House, said Eric H. Yoffie in Haaretz (Tel Aviv). It risks offending Israel’s liberal allies abroad, and emboldening its enemies. True, the numbers who backed far-right parties were pretty small. But “make no mistake”: if, as expected, Netanyahu gives those parties a role in his government, it will do serious damage to Israel’s standing on the world stage.
-
A tall ship adventure in the Mediterranean
The Week Recommends Sailing aboard this schooner and exploring Portugal, Spain and Monaco is a 'magical' experience
-
How drone warfare works
The Explainer From Ukraine to Iran, it has become clear that unmanned aircraft are rapidly revolutionising modern warfare
-
The tourist flood in the Mediterranean: can it be stemmed?
Talking Point Finger-pointing at Airbnb or hotel owners obscures the root cause of overtourism in holiday hotspots: unmanageable demand
-
The armed clan allied with Israel in Gaza
Under the Radar Self-styled 'Popular Forces' has been denounced by its Bedouin tribe and Hamas for 'collaborating' with Israel
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?
today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
Iran nukes program set back months, early intel suggests
Speed Read A Pentagon assessment says US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites only set the program back by months, not years. This contradicts President Donald Trump's claim.
-
Trump says Iran and Israel agreed to ceasefire
Speed Read This followed a night of Israeli airstrikes on Tehran and multiple waves of missiles fired by Iran
-
How developed was Iran's nuclear program and what's left now?
Today's Big Question Israel and the United States have said different things about Iran's capabilities
-
Trump gives himself 2 weeks for Iran decision
Speed Read Trump said he believes negotiations will occur in the near future
-
What would a US strike on Iran mean for the Middle East?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION A precise attack could break Iran's nuclear programme – or pull the US and its allies into a drawn-out war even more damaging than Iraq or Afghanistan
-
US says Trump vetoed Israeli strike on Khamenei
Speed Read This comes as Israel and Iran pushed their conflict into its fourth day