Inside the suspected poisoning of Roman Abramovich
Russian oligarch lost his sight for several hours after alleged chemical attack at peace talks
Roman Abramovich suffered symptoms of a suspected poisoning during peace talks on the Ukraine-Belarus border earlier this month, sources close to the Russian billionaire have claimed.
The ultra-rich owner of Chelsea Football Club experienced “red eyes, constant and painful tearing, and peeling skin” on his face and hands, The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) said. Ukrainian MP Rustem Umerov and another negotiator were also affected by the alleged attack.
Sources close to Abramovich, who has “shuttled between Moscow, Belarus and other negotiating venues since Russia invaded Ukraine”, told the paper that he “was blinded for a few hours and later had trouble eating”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Russian saboteurs
The attack on Abramovich and others involved in talks to bring the conflict in Ukraine is said to have taken place on 3 March. Sources close to the oligarch said his condition has since improved. He was pictured last week in the VIP lounge of an Israeli airport.
Individuals with knowledge of the suspected poisoning told the WSJ that it was being blamed “on hard-liners in Moscow who they said wanted to sabotage talks to end the war”. A source close to Abramovich said it was “not clear” who was behind the attack.
The investigation into Abramovich’s mysterious symptoms was spearheaded by Christo Grozev, the lead Russia investigator at Bellingcat who first revealed that a team of Kremlin agents poisoned Russian opposition politician Alexei Navalny with a nerve agent in 2020.
It was discovered during the enquiries that the three individuals that later developed symptoms consistent with poisoning had consumed “only chocolate and water in the hours before the symptoms appeared”, the WSJ reported.
Grozev told the paper that he had seen images of the oligarch following the attack. But “examinations of the affected individuals couldn’t be arranged” as “these people were in a hurry to get to Istanbul” following the talks, the WSJ added.
That Abramovich survived the chemical attack suggests that the poisoning was “not intended to kill” the oligarch, Grozev said, adding: “It was just a warning.”
Unclear role
The attack on Abramovich, who has long denied having close ties to the Kremlin, has “cast light” on his “reported role as a broker in talks between Ukraine and Russia”, the BBC said. His spokesperson has previously stated that his influence is “limited”.
Last week, the WSJ separately revealed that Volodymyr Zelenskyy personally requested that the Biden administration not sanction Abramovich. The paper said that the Ukrainian president explained to his US counterpart in a call that Abramovich could “prove important as a go-between with Russia in helping to negotiate peace”.
“Several Ukrainian officials and officials from other Western governments” were said to be “sceptical about how deeply Abramovich is involved in the peace talks”, the paper added. The Ukrainian president���s office refused to comment on his role.
“Inevitably people will be wondering if this was the work of the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence service, who Britain concluded was behind the Novichok Salisbury poisoning in 2018,” said BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner.
“But we have no idea who did it,” he added. “There is no claim of responsibility.”
‘Century-old fascination’
Just as doubt remains over Abramovich’s involvement and influence in the effort to end the war, the “truth may never be known about [the] latest ‘Russian poisoning’”, said The Guardian’s defence and security editor Dan Sabbagh.
“The plot, in its initial telling, appears bizarre,” he said, “but the Kremlin has enough form in this area for poisoning to be a plausible cause, a hundred-year history that dates back to the founding of Moscow’s Lab X poisoning laboratory by Vladimir Lenin in 1921.”
It is also known that the goal of such attacks is not “always to kill”, he added. “Labour MP Chris Bryant revealed he fell violently ill with food poisoning during an official trip to Russia in 2009, when he was a junior Foreign Office minister.”
Bryant later stated publicly that his symptoms were a result of “standard irritants meted out by the FSB to ‘difficult’ visitors”.
Chemical attacks were “one of the favoured methods of assassination for the KGB, the successor to the NKVD, offering the opportunity to flee the scene of the crime”, said The Times. And after Putin’s “ascension to power”, such attacks “came back into fashion”.
As well as the attacks on Navalny and the poisoning on British soil in Salisbury, Viktor Yushchenko, the former president of Ukraine, was disfigured when he was poisoned with dioxin in 2004, and Russian defector Alexander Litvinenko died after being targeted with radionuclide polonium-210 in 2006 while living in London.
While the full facts may never be known, Russia has a “century-old fascination with deadly toxins”, the paper added. Abramovich may therefore be “the latest victim in Russia’s long history” of chemical attacks.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The Pentagon faces an uncertain future with Trump
Talking Point The president-elect has nominated conservative commentator Pete Hegseth to lead the Defense Department
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
This is what you should know about State Department travel advisories and warnings
In Depth Stay safe on your international adventures
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
'All Tyson-Paul promised was spectacle and, in the end, that's all we got'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Cuba's energy crisis
The Explainer Already beset by a host of issues, the island nation is struggling with nationwide blackouts
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published
-
Putin's fixation with shamans
Under the Radar Secretive Russian leader, said to be fascinated with occult and pagan rituals, allegedly asked for blessing over nuclear weapons
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Chimpanzees are dying of human diseases
Under the radar Great apes are vulnerable to human pathogens thanks to genetic similarity, increased contact and no immunity
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Deaths of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies hang over Sydney's Mardi Gras
The Explainer Police officer, the former partner of TV presenter victim, charged with two counts of murder after turning himself in
By Austin Chen, The Week UK Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 24 February - 1 March
Puzzles and Quizzes Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will mounting discontent affect Iran election?
Today's Big Question Low turnout is expected in poll seen as crucial test for Tehran's leadership
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Sweden clears final NATO hurdle with Hungary vote
Speed Read Hungary's parliament overwhelmingly approved Sweden's accession to NATO
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published