How the George Floyd protests informed the military's slow response on Jan. 6
On Jan. 6, the Pentagon did the wrong thing for the right reasons.
The wrong thing, of course, was not responding quickly when it became clear that "Stop the Steal" protests had morphed into something much more treacherous. Defense leaders have taken a lot of heat for the military's sluggish reaction, but some of the blame surely goes to then-President Trump, who was reportedly "delighted" by the scenes of chaos, and who never got around to ordering the military to intervene.
A new Senate report on the security failures of Jan. 6 reveals that something else was going on, too: Having come under fierce criticism for their response to nationwide Black Lives Matter demonstrations during the summer of 2020, Pentagon officials were anxious not to be seen using force against a political protest at a highly charged moment.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"DOD's response to January 6 was informed by criticism it received about its response to the civil unrest after the murder of George Floyd during the summer of 2020," the report explains. "DOD was criticized for its heavy-handed response, particularly flying military helicopters over the protests... DOD officials cited lessons learned from the summer 2020 as guiding its decision-making for January 6."
That's actually pretty reasonable.
By the time the insurrection had occurred, Gen. Mark Milley had long since apologized for appearing in Trump's disastrous Lafayette Square photo op. The New York Times newsroom had torn itself apart over an op-ed urging the military be sent into the streets to crack down on the post-George Floyd unrest. And defense leaders had spent months before the election rightly signaling their desire not to be drawn into domestic politics.
That is the correct instinct. In the case of Jan. 6, however, the impulse also produced a dangerously insufficient response to an actual insurrection.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Perhaps we'll eventually learn that something more sinister was at work in the Defense Department's actions that day. Certainly, one can't help but note that the largely white MAGA crowd was treated with more deference than the previous summer's BLM protesters. But right now the evidence suggests we're left with an irony — in its desire to respect democratic rights, the Pentagon inadvertently allowed American democracy to be grievously wounded.
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
How are these Epstein files so damaging to Trump?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As Republicans and Democrats release dueling tranches of Epstein-related documents, the White House finds itself caught in a mess partially of its own making
-
Margaret Atwood’s memoir, intergenerational trauma and the fight to make spousal rape a crime: Welcome to November booksThe Week Recommends This month's new releases include ‘Book of Lives: A Memoir of Sorts’ by Margaret Atwood, ‘Cursed Daughters’ by Oyinkan Braithwaite and 'Without Consent' by Sarah Weinman
-
‘Tariffs are making daily life less affordable now’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Will California tax its billionaires?Talking Points A proposed one-time levy would shore up education and Medicaid
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
Is Trump a lame duck president?Talking Points Republicans are considering a post-Trump future
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Nick Fuentes’ Groyper antisemitism is splitting the rightTalking Points Interview with Tucker Carlson draws conservative backlash
-
Is Mike Johnson rendering the House ‘irrelevant’?Talking Points Speaker has put the House on indefinite hiatus
-
Will Republicans kill the filibuster to end the shutdown?Talking Points GOP officials contemplate the ‘nuclear option’
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
