The death knell of the congressional investigation
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy is playing a bad political hand as well as he can: when House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejected two of his choices for the special committee investigating the Capitol riot, he announced he would pull everyone and launch his own parallel probe into the events of Jan. 6.
"We will run our own investigation," McCarthy said. "Why was the Capitol so ill-prepared for that day when they knew on Dec. 14 they had a problem? And what have we done to make sure that never happens again?" He added, "House Democrats must answer this question: Why are you allowing a lame-duck speaker to destroy this institution?"
The strategy is clear: make the Democrats plus Liz Cheney committee look even more like political theater. Turn the whole debate into one blaming Pelosi for poor Capitol security versus Democrats faulting former President Donald Trump's election claims for inciting the riot in the first place.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Will this help get to the bottom of the Capitol riot? Likely no. But congressional oversight, a legitimate constitutional duty, has long turned into a partisan exercise. Under Republicans, there were numerous hearings about former President Bill Clinton and later Benghazi that did little to move the needle of public opinion. Democrats conducted similar investigations into Trump's business dealings and alleged dalliances with Russians amid the country's efforts to swing the 2016 presidential election.
Red meat for partisans, to be sure, but unconvincing to anyone on the fence. Gone are the days of the Watergate committee blowing open a big scandal in an eventually if belatedly bipartisan fashion. Now, not even Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller is seen as an honest broker but rather a figure in the Democrats' quest to get the 45th president.
Cheney's presence on the Democrat-run committee, plus the general tone of the media coverage of Jan. 6, will give it marginally more legitimacy. But not much. There are legitimate questions about the organizers of the riot, the seriousness of the effort to disrupt the Electoral College certification, the extent of Capitol security preparation and, yes, Trump's culpability. There is a picture the individual rioter prosecutions probably can't paint. Unfortunately, Congress won't either.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
6 exquisite homes with vast acreageFeature Featuring an off-the-grid contemporary home in New Mexico and lakefront farmhouse in Massachusetts
-
Film reviews: ‘Wuthering Heights,’ ‘Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die,’ and ‘Sirat’Feature An inconvenient love torments a would-be couple, a gonzo time traveler seeks to save humanity from AI, and a father’s desperate search goes deeply sideways
-
Political cartoons for February 16Cartoons Monday’s political cartoons include President's Day, a valentine from the Epstein files, and more
-
Grand jury rejects charging 6 Democrats for ‘orders’ videoSpeed Read The jury refused to indict Democratic lawmakers for a video in which they urged military members to resist illegal orders
-
Democrats push for ICE accountabilityFeature U.S. citizens shot and violently detained by immigration agents testify at Capitol Hill hearing
-
Big-time money squabbles: the conflict over California’s proposed billionaire taxTalking Points Californians worth more than $1.1 billion would pay a one-time 5% tax
-
Will Peter Mandelson and Andrew testify to US Congress?Today's Big Question Could political pressure overcome legal obstacles and force either man to give evidence over their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?
-
Did Alex Pretti’s killing open a GOP rift on guns?Talking Points Second Amendment groups push back on the White House narrative
-
Rep. Ilhan Omar attacked with unknown liquidSpeed Read This ‘small agitator isn’t going to intimidate me from doing my work’
-
Washington grapples with ICE’s growing footprint — and futureTALKING POINTS The deadly provocations of federal officers in Minnesota have put ICE back in the national spotlight
-
Can anyone stop Donald Trump?Today's Big Question US president ‘no longer cares what anybody thinks’ so how to counter his global strongman stance?
