Biden undermines his own climate goals
The U.N. reported this week that the world is on fire. The Biden administration has followed up by pouring fuel on the blaze.
The White House on Wednesday issued a statement from National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, urging OPEC to bump up its production of crude oil to bring down the cost of gasoline.
"Higher gasoline costs, if left unchecked, risk harming the ongoing global recovery," Sullivan said, and later added: "President Biden has made clear that he wants Americans to have access to affordable and reliable energy, including at the pump."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Is more oil production a bad idea? Let's ask ... the White House. On Wednesday, the administration also released a "Readout of the Fifth National Climate Task Force Meeting," a response to this week's United Nations report sounding a "code red for humanity" — a global climate emergency caused largely by humankind's use of fossil fuels.
"Americans are already feeling the effects of climate change – from devastating wildfires to extreme heat to a historic drought – and the IPCC report reminds us that we must act swiftly and decisively to reduce greenhouse gas emissions," the statement read.
Not too swiftly or decisively, it seems. We still need cheap gasoline, after all.
There is nothing surprising about this. Democratic administrations have been much better than Republican administrations at taking climate-friendly steps like creating higher fuel standards for vehicles and encouraging the growth of clean energy sources. But even Democrats have been reluctant to tackle the problem with the vigor one would expect in an emergency situation. Under the Biden administration, for example, gas and oil drilling permits are at their highest level since the George W. Bush administration. The much-vaunted Paris Accords, signed by President Obama, fall short of what's necessary to slow down planetary warming — and the agreement is mostly toothless, anyway, lacking any real enforcement mechanisms.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Mostly, when forced to choose between the short-term and long-term, Democratic presidents — like the rest of humanity — choose the short-term. That's somewhat understandable: For millions of American voters, higher gas prices are a problem now, or at least an annoyance. But recent events have shown that the long term isn't actually so long. The Biden administration's decision to pressure OPEC might make a certain amount of sense today. It won't tomorrow.
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
A ‘golden age’ of nuclear powerThe Explainer The government is promising to ‘fire up nuclear power’. Why, and how?
-
Massacre in Darfur: the world looked the other wayTalking Point Atrocities in El Fasher follow decades of repression of Sudan’s black African population
-
Trump’s trade war: has China won?Talking Point US president wanted to punish Beijing, but the Asian superpower now holds the whip hand
-
‘This is where adaptation enters’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Nick Fuentes’ Groyper antisemitism is splitting the rightTalking Points Interview with Tucker Carlson draws conservative backlash
-
Is Mike Johnson rendering the House ‘irrelevant’?Talking Points Speaker has put the House on indefinite hiatus
-
Will Republicans kill the filibuster to end the shutdown?Talking Points GOP officials contemplate the ‘nuclear option’
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Western Alaska reels as storm aftermath prompts mass evacuationsUNDER THE RADAR Alaskan lawmakers point to climate change as airlifts relocate hundreds from coastal communities devastated by the remnants of Typhoon Halong
-
Are inflatable costumes and naked bike rides helping or hurting ICE protests?Talking Points Trump administration efforts to portray Portland and Chicago as dystopian war zones have been met with dancing frogs, bare butts and a growing movement to mock MAGA doomsaying
