What the CIA just revealed about its Lee Harvey Oswald connection
The agency has admitted a key fact about Oswald for the first time


For decades, the Central Intelligence Agency has stated that it was unaware of Lee Harvey Oswald before his 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy. But a bombshell list of records from the CIA, released this month among a tranche of documents from the House Oversight Committee, claims that this was not the case. This marks the first time the CIA has openly admitted that it had prior knowledge of Oswald in the lead-up to Kennedy's death. It could also raise new questions about one of the most longstanding conspiracy theories in American history.
What did the files reveal?
The documents, now available on the agency's website, concern a CIA intelligence officer based in Miami, George Joannides. They show that in 1963, Joannides was "helping finance and oversee a group of Cuban students opposed to the ascension of Fidel Castro" as part of a "covert assignment to manage anti-Castro propaganda and disrupt pro-Castro groups," said The Washington Post.
The group Joannides led, known as DRE, was "aware of Oswald as he publicly promoted a pro-Castro policy for the U.S.," said the Post, and the group reportedly clashed with Oswald just three months before Kennedy's assassination. Oswald also "debated DRE activists on local TV, providing more media attention to him as a communist," said Axios. It's unclear whether Joannides himself ever met Oswald, but he was known to operate under the alias "Howard." This is despite the fact that the CIA has long "stated that it had no records of anyone named Howard," said The Independent.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It may be that the CIA was tracking Oswald even before Joannides got involved, especially after he defected to the Soviet Union in 1959. At least "35 CIA employees handled reports on Oswald between 1959 and 1963," said Jefferson Morley, a Kennedy researcher, to the Post. This included a "half dozen officers who reported personally" to CIA Counterintelligence Chief James Angleton or Deputy Director Richard Helms.
What does this mean?
The documents show that the CIA "lied for decades about Joannides' role in the Kennedy case," said The Daily Beast. The agency also claimed that it had "nothing to do with" the Cuban students' anti-Castro efforts. The revelation that the CIA appeared to cover up its prior knowledge of Oswald "adds fuel to the long-simmering questions around what the agency knew about the plot to murder the president, and what else it may be hiding," said the Post.
The files were released as part of an effort to "comply with President Donald Trump's executive order to disclose all documents about the former president's death," said The Daily Beast. But experts noted that the original release of documents "didn't include two-thirds of the promised files, any of the 500 IRS records, or the recently discovered FBI files," said The Independent. But this new information on Oswald has some historians wondering aloud.
This is a "breakthrough, and there's more to come," said Morley to the Post. The "burden of proof has shifted. There's a story here that's been hidden and avoided, and now it needs to be explored. It's up to the government to explain." The main "question is what was Joannides doing for the CIA monitoring Oswald?" said Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, a former CIA counterintelligence officer, to the Post. "This looks a hell of a lot like a CIA operation."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Justin Klawans has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022. He began his career covering local news before joining Newsweek as a breaking news reporter, where he wrote about politics, national and global affairs, business, crime, sports, film, television and other news. Justin has also freelanced for outlets including Collider and United Press International.
-
September 21 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Sunday's political cartoons include muzzled speech, blaming Joe Biden, and more
-
Is free speech under threat in Britain?
The Explainer The Trump administration thinks that free speech is in retreat in Britain. What do we mean by freedom of speech, and is it in danger?
-
Crossword: September 21, 2025
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
-
Democrats’ strategy to woo voters for 2026: religion
The Explainer Politicians like Rob Sand and James Talarico have made a name for themselves pushing their faith
-
Groypers: the alt-right group pulled into the foreground
The Explainer The network is led by alt-right activist Nick Fuentes
-
Is Kash Patel’s fate sealed after Kirk shooting missteps?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The FBI’s bungled response in the immediate aftermath of the Charlie Kirk shooting has director Kash Patel in the hot seat
-
Calls for both calm and consequences follow Kirk killing
TALKING POINTS The suspected assassination of far-right activist Charlie Kirk has some public figures pleading for restraint, while others agitate for violent reprisals
-
The Secret Service is reportedly facing a massive sniper shortage
The Explainer The agency is reportedly dealing with a 73% shortage
-
What's a pocket rescission and can Trump use one?
The Explainer The White House may try to use an obscure and prohibited trick to halt more spending
-
The push for a progressive mayor has arrived in Seattle
The Explainer Two liberals will face off in this November's election
-
New White House guidance means federal employees could be hearing more religious talk at work
The Explainer Employees can now try to persuade co-workers that their religion is 'correct'