Court allows National Guard in LA as Dodgers repel feds
The team said they 'denied entry' to ICE agents seeking to enter their stadium


What happened
A three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously Thursday night that President Donald Trump could continue his controversial National Guard deployment in Los Angeles, indefinitely blocking a lower court ruling that would have returned control of the Guard to California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). Trump sent in 4,100 Guard members and 700 Marines in response to ongoing protests of ICE raids. The Los Angeles Dodgers said Thursday they had "denied entry" to "ICE agents" seeking access to Dodger Stadium.
Who said what
"Federal immigration agents in a line of unmarked white vans and SUVs attempted to enter" first one, then a second Dodgers parking lot gate Thursday morning, but did not gain entry, the Los Angeles Times said. Protesters showed up, then the L.A. Police Department, after which the federal agents drove away. ICE said on X it was "never there" and a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said Customs and Border Protection officials were at the stadium parking lot "very briefly" but it was "unrelated to any operation or enforcement."
At least some of the federal vehicles "were believed to have been involved in an immigration raid at a Home Depot" earlier in the morning, the Times said, and one migrant advocate at the stadium said a CBP officer told her they had brought the "detainees here to process them." The Dodgers, whose "fan base includes a significant Latino contingent," have come under criticism for "not speaking out publicly" against the ICE raids, Reuters said.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The appellate panel said Trump was likely to be able to show he had enough cause to nationalize the National Guard over Newsom's objections, but they added that courts could still step in if the president's deployment decision was "obviously absurd or made in bad faith." Trump's order "isn't limited to California, and could be applied to any state," The Wall Street Journal said.
What next?
Newsom could "ask a larger, 11-judge panel of the appeals court to take up the issue or seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court," Politico said, but "the Guard deployment could be over and the dispute could be moot" by the time another court weighs in.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
'The Minnesota attacks join a grim catalog of political violence'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Another Starship blast sets back Musk's Mars hopes
Speed Read Nobody was killed in the explosion, which occurred in south Texas
-
3 tips to save for a cruise this year
The Explainer The convenience of a cruise doesn't necessarily come cheap without some strategic planning
-
'The Minnesota attacks join a grim catalog of political violence'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
'Is it even possible to enjoy a trip without contributing to the problem?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
ICE arrests NYC comptroller at courthouse
Speed Read Brad Lander was held for about four hours before being released
-
Trump ramps up Iran threats, demands 'surrender'
Speed Read Trump met with his top aides in the Situation Room on Tuesday
-
Travel ban: It's back and it's bigger
Feature Trump revives a controversial travel ban, targeting mostly poor, nonwhite countries
-
'Big Oil does not accept responsibility'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
DNC rocked by high-profile departures as future is in question
IN THE SPOTLIGHT Generational shifts, ambiguous priorities, and the intensifying dangers of the Trump administration have pushed the organization into uncertain territory
-
ABA sues Trump over 'law firm intimidation policy'
Speed Read Trump has 'used the vast powers of the executive branch to coerce lawyers,' the lawsuit said