The political latitude of Musk's cost-cutting task force
A $2 trillion goal. And big obstacles in the way.


Donald Trump has put Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy in charge of slashing federal spending. Their so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) isn't actually a government department (it's an advisory body), but it could still transform government. Or it could end up doing what so many blue-ribbon commissions have done before and disappear without leaving much of a mark.
Musk and Ramaswamy want to take a "chainsaw" to the federal budget, said The Washington Post. On the potential chopping block: Everything from veterans' health care and education spending to NASA and international aid. Trump has "mandated us for radical, drastic reform of this federal bureaucracy," Ramaswamy said on Fox News. There's arguably a need to tighten the federal belt, as the national debt is approaching $36 trillion. But making big cuts "might be more difficult" than the chainsaw-wielders expect, said the Post.
Musk has set a goal of cutting $2 trillion from the federal budget. That's a "formidable task," said The New York Times. There is definitely waste in the federal budget — Medicare and Medicaid spent a combined $100 billion on fraud last year. But achieving Musk's goal will be "thorny" without "cutting programs that Congress or Trump would want to protect," said the Times.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
'The math doesn't add up'
The Department of Government Efficiency is really the "Department of Project 2025 — but worse," Michael Embrich said at Rolling Stone. Musk and Ramaswamy have proposed hitting their $2 trillion goal, in part, by firing up to 95% of government employees, but the "math simply doesn't add up." Worker pay typically makes up 80% of private sector costs, but less than 4% of the federal budget goes to paying civilian employees. Firing all of those workers would save a relatively piddly $271 billion. Musk and Ramaswamy say they want to run government like a business, Embrich said, but "their analogy falls flat."
Giving cost-cutting responsibilities to a "couple of wealthy tech bros might work where nothing else has," J.D. Tuccille said at Reason. Given that the federal government "hasn't balanced its books in decades," the unlikely duo "might be our only hope of avoiding catastrophe." It's likely that DOGE's recommendations will face a "complete lack of political will in Washington," Tuccille said. "But what are the alternatives?"
'Holy hell to pay'
"Politicians like to giveth, not taketh away," Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen said at Axios. Musk wants to be Trump's "wrecking ball," and the president-elect's aides are looking for ways to "bypass Congress" to unilaterally adopt DOGE's recommendations. But "legally, Elon can't just stop cutting checks." Ultimately, Congress holds the power of the purse, and elected officials aren't likely to approve cuts to Social Security, health care or defense spending. "There'd be holy hell to pay politically," said VandeHei and Allen.
But Musk and Ramaswamy don't have to worry about the voters, and they're thinking big. "We expect certain agencies to be deleted outright," Ramaswamy told Fox News' Maria Bartiromo. He expects never to get another chance like this. "If we don't downsize the federal government now," Ramaswamy said, "it's never going to happen in the future as well."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
How will the new tax deductions on auto loans work?
the explainer Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act introduced a tax deduction on auto loan interest — but eligibility for the tax break is limited
-
Is Trump actually going to prosecute Obama for 'treason'?
Today's Big Question Or is this just a distraction from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal?
-
5 best movie sequels of all time
The Week Recommends The second time is only sometimes as good as the first
-
'Spending is what card issuers are hoping you will do'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump executive order targets homeless
Speed Read It will now be easier for states and cities to remove homeless people from the streets
-
Florida judge and DOJ make Epstein trouble for Trump
Speed Read The Trump administration's request to release grand jury transcripts from the Epstein investigation was denied
-
Trump attacks Obama as Epstein furor mounts
Speed Read The Trump administration accused the Obama administration of 'treasonous' behavior during the 2016 election
-
Deportations: The growing backlash
Feature New poll numbers show declining support for Trump's deportation crackdown
-
Is Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show' cancellation an omen of something worse?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION CBS said its decision to end the talk show was strictly business. But the timing and nature of the announcement has some observers wondering if there's more at play behind the scenes.
-
Citizenship: Trump order blocked again
Feature After the Supreme Court restricted nationwide injunctions, a federal judge turned to a class action suit to block Trump's order to end birthright citizenship
-
Epstein: Why MAGA won't move on
Feature Trump's supporters are turning on him after he denied the existence of Epstein's client list