Home energy: Bills are up, efficiency is out
The Energy Star program saves Americans billions of dollars, but the Trump administration plans to 'eliminate' it
President Trump's war on appliance standards won't help your budget, said Tik Root in Grist. After attacking low flow showerheads and LED lights, the White House has now set its sights on the federal Energy Star program, which it wants "eliminated." Launched in 1992, Energy Star has set "efficiency specifications for products ranging from dishwashers to entire homes." It also offers federal rebates for efficient appliances and a federal tax incentive for building Energy Star homes. Certification is voluntary, but most major manufacturers participate because consumers overwhelmingly like it. "More than 1,000 companies, cities, and groups wrote a letter to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin urging him to support the program," noting that it costs only $32 million to administer, yet it saves American households $40 billion annually on energy bills.
Manufacturers can market energy savings without a federal program, said Jeff Luse in Reason. This is "yet another example of the government doing a job that the private sector could do." In fact, the gigantic influence of Energy Star—with its signature blue labels—has likely crowded out even "more accurate ways to measure energy operating costs." Except this is not really about energy costs, said Elizabeth Kolbert in The New Yorker. Lowering those was a Trump campaign vow. But in reality, the administration is much more interested in sabotaging anything remotely "related to curbing greenhouse gas emissions." The second Trump term "has been to climate protection what the Visigoths were to Rome," and even a program that is as "unusually well known and popular" as Energy Star is a target.
Meanwhile, utility companies are seizing the moment to raise prices, said Jamie Smyth and Amanda Chu in the Financial Times. Utility bills are up 6 percent year over year, far outpacing inflation. Last month, Dominion Energy, one of America's biggest utilities, "proposed raising consumer bills by 14 percent next year to cover costs linked to soaring electricity demand" from AI data centers. "A typical monthly bill for a Dominion customer" is already $140. Similar requests to regulators have been made by other U.S. utilities, including Con Edison, which hopes to jack up its prices on New York City residents by 11.4 percent. We're already entering a point of "energy scarcity," said Mark Gongloff in Bloomberg, and a federal baseline for energy efficiency helps "ease the strain on electric grids" that Trump "claims to be so worried about" as he advances AI initiatives. "It's pretty obvious by now that Trump's real goal is probably not alleviating some sort of energy emergency or cutting Americans' bills." It's just burning more oil, gas, and coal to fulfill his promise to the fossil fuel industry.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Zimbabwe’s driving crisisUnder the Radar Southern African nation is experiencing a ‘public health disaster’ with one of the highest road fatality rates in the world
-
The Mint’s 250th anniversary coins face a whitewashing controversyThe Explainer The designs omitted several notable moments for civil rights and women’s rights
-
‘If regulators nix the rail merger, supply chain inefficiency will persist’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Venezuela’s Trump-shaped power vacuumIN THE SPOTLIGHT The American abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has thrust South America’s biggest oil-producing state into uncharted geopolitical waters
-
Trump says US ‘in charge’ of Venezuela after Maduro grabSpeed Read The American president claims the US will ‘run’ Venezuela for an unspecified amount of time, contradicting a statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio
-
‘Let 2026 be a year of reckoning’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Jack Smith: Trump ‘caused’ Jan. 6 riotSpeed Read
-
Wave of cancellations prompts Kennedy Center turmoilIN THE SPOTLIGHT Accusations and allegations fly as artists begin backing off their regularly scheduled appearances
-
Trump considers giving Ukraine a security guaranteeTalking Points Zelenskyy says it is a requirement for peace. Will Putin go along?
-
Why is Trump’s alleged strike on Venezuela shrouded in so much secrecy?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Trump’s comments have raised more questions than answers about what his administration is doing in the Southern Hemisphere
-
Vance’s ‘next move will reveal whether the conservative movement can move past Trump’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day