How feasible is a Ukraine ceasefire?
Kyiv has condemned Putin's 'manipulative' response to proposed agreement

Vladimir Putin thinks there are "grounds for optimism" over a 30-day ceasefire deal with Ukraine but added that there is "a lot ahead to be done".
With Volodymyr Zelenskyy rejecting Moscow's "manipulative" preconditions and both sides reporting enemy drone attacks overnight, a truce seems further away than it once appeared.
What did the commentators say?
Putin's conditions are believed to include the demilitarisation of Ukraine, an end to Western military aid and a commitment to keeping Kyiv out of Nato. This was “a no disguised as a yes”, said the BBC, because the terms would be "devastating" for Ukraine to accept.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Russia's demands are "impossible" for Ukraine, said The Independent, so Kyiv is "likely to see Mr Putin's stance as an attempt to buy time" while his forces "squeeze the last Ukrainian troops out of western Russia".
Moscow has "no interest in a ceasefire", Boris Bondarev, a former Kremlin diplomat, told Politico, because Putin "thinks he can achieve his goals through fighting". Even Donald Trump's threats of significant financial consequences might not be enough because Putin's "not afraid of irritating him".
Moscow believes Trump is "weak, lacks a core set of principles and may be open to manipulation", a European intelligence official told The Washington Post. And Putin "has not veered from his maximalist goal of dominating" Ukraine.
But there are "good reasons" for the Kremlin to agree to the ceasefire, Mikhail Komin, a Russian political scientist, said on the Center for European Policy Analysis. It would give Russia "time to replenish its forces" and it could "push" Ukrainian troops out of the Kursk region first, burying Kyiv's idea of a "territorial exchange".
Ending a war is "seldom straightforward", said The Guardian, and as Russia has "a record of violating ceasefires and peace agreements, a robust process is critical".
That process could require several thousand monitors, "able to communicate and deconflict across both sides" of the front, which is 2,000km (1,250 miles) long. But modern technology, such as drones, airborne and satellite reconnaissance, would make ceasefire monitoring "easier" now than it was in the aftermath of the Minsk agreements of 2014 and 2015.
What next?
Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff met Putin during his visit to Moscow yesterday, the Kremlin has confirmed, and the two men agreed that the US and Russian presidents will speak to each other. "The exact time of the conversation between the two presidents has not yet been agreed upon," said Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, but there is an "understanding" in both countries that a "conversation between the presidents" is "necessary".
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
Senate passes GOP megabill after Alaska side deal
The pivotal yes vote came from Sen. Lisa Murkowski, whose support was secured following negotiated side deals for her home state Alaska
-
July 2 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Wednesday's political cartoons include a problem for Florida sports fans, a pork-laden 'Big, beautiful, bill' and future generations being saddled with debt.
-
Evita: 'TikTok musical theatre' or 'total triumph'?
Talking Point Rachel Zegler dazzles in Jamie Lloyd's 'radically reconceived' revival – but the plot is difficult to follow
-
How would the Trump administration denaturalize immigrant citizens?
Today's Big Question Using civil courts lowers the burden of proof
-
'Trucking is a dangerous business'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump sues LA over immigration policies
Speed Read He is suing over the city's sanctuary law, claiming it prevents local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities
-
Obama, Bush and Bono eulogize USAID on final day
Speed Read The US Agency for International Development, a humanitarian organization, has been gutted by the Trump administration
-
Trump's strikes on Iran: a 'spectacular success'?
In Depth Military humiliations 'expose the brittleness' of Tehran's ageing regime, but risk reinforcing its commitment to its nuclear program
-
Will NATO countries meet their new spending goal?
today's big question The cost of keeping Trump happy
-
GOP races to revise megabill after Senate rulings
Speed Read A Senate parliamentarian ruled that several changes to Medicaid included in Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" were not permissible
-
Trump plans Iran talks, insists nuke threat gone
Speed Read 'The war is done' and 'we destroyed the nuclear,' said President Trump