San Francisco tackles affordability problems with free child care
It will be offered to thousands of families in the city
While San Francisco is one of the most notoriously expensive places to live in the United States, the city’s mayor, Daniel Lurie, has unveiled a plan to help drive down costs. It involves providing free and subsidized child care for families across the city. Part of a larger effort by Lurie to ease the city’s cost burden, experts say this move is a good first step toward making the City by the Bay more affordable.
What is on offer?
The new child care program is part of an “action plan with steps to make housing, child care, education, food, health care and transportation more affordable for San Franciscans,” said Lurie’s office in a press release. The tentpole of this program will “expand free child care for low- and middle-income families at more than 500 high-quality providers across the city.”
For families of four earning up to $230,000 per year, child care will be free at these locations, while families of four earning up to $310,000 per year will get a 50% subsidy for child care. While it may seem counterintuitive to offer free child care to families making six figures, San Francisco “consistently ranks among the most expensive cities in the U.S., with housing, child care and other daily costs exceeding national averages,” said Bloomberg. Full-time child care for an infant in San Francisco “can cost as much as $30,000 a year, an expense that can rival rent payments.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Will this help San Francisco’s affordability?
The expansion of child care will be “funded by a $570 million reserve of unspent money from a commercial rent tax voters approved in 2018,” said the San Francisco Chronicle. As a result of the new program, about “12,000 children under age 5 will become newly eligible for child care tuition support and more than 7,000 other children are expected to see their current financial support doubled.”
Many in the city are feeling positive about the new program. For families in the “middle-income range, child care costs are an enormous burden. This investment offers real relief,” said Sara O’Neill, the founder of the San Francisco-based Slippery Fish Preschool, in a statement obtained by SFGate.
Many parents struggling to afford child care also seem to be looking forward to the program. “It would be a huge difference for our family,” Sarah Klevan, a mother of two, told KQED San Francisco. While Klevan and her husband each make six-figure salaries, they “live paycheck-to-paycheck in San Francisco” and spend about $2,000 per month for child care for their two kids. “We’re really lucky to have family nearby [to provide backup care],” Klevan said. “I really don’t think it would be feasible for us to live here otherwise.”
But there is also a question of whether the mayor’s office is doing this simply as part of a political message. Democrats like Lurie “seized on voters’ concerns about the high costs of housing, child care, health care, food and other essentials as they won major races” across the nation, said the Chronicle. Lurie, who took office in 2025, isn’t up for reelection soon, but wants to “promote the national narrative that San Francisco is bouncing back on his watch.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Justin Klawans has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022. He began his career covering local news before joining Newsweek as a breaking news reporter, where he wrote about politics, national and global affairs, business, crime, sports, film, television and other news. Justin has also freelanced for outlets including Collider and United Press International.
-
How realistic is the Democratic plan to retake the Senate this year?TODAY’S BIG QUESTION Schumer is growing bullish on his party’s odds in November — is it typical partisan optimism, or something more?
-
Taxes: It’s California vs. the billionairesFeature Larry Page and Peter Thiel may take their wealth elsewhere
-
Buffett: The end of a golden era for Berkshire HathawayFeature After 60 years, the Oracle of Omaha retires
-
‘The surest way to shorten our lives even more is to scare us about sleep’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
White House ends TPS protections for SomalisSpeed Read The Trump administration has given these Somalis until March 17 to leave the US
-
Judge clears wind farm construction to resumeSpeed Read The Trump administration had ordered the farm shuttered in December over national security issues
-
Kelly sues Hegseth, Pentagon over censureSpeed Read Hegseth’s censure was ‘unlawful and unconstitutional,’ Kelly said
-
Minnesota, Illinois sue to stop ICE ‘invasion’Speed Read Minnesota officials are also seeking a temporary restraining order
-
Trump DOJ targets Fed’s Powell, drawing pushbackSpeed Read Powell called the investigation ‘unprecedented’
-
EU-Mercosur mega trade deal: 25 years in the makingThe Explainer Despite opposition from France and Ireland among others, the ‘significant’ agreement with the South American bloc is set to finally go ahead
-
A running list of everything Trump has named or renamed after himselfIn Depth The Kennedy Center is the latest thing to be slapped with Trump’s name
