Supreme Court keeps Trump on ballots
They ruled that Colorado and other states cannot disqualify former President Donald Trump from federal office


What happened?
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that Colorado and other states cannot disqualify former President Donald Trump from federal office under Section 3 of the 14th amendment, which bars candidates who "engaged in insurrection." A 5-4 majority said Congress must pass legislation for the 14th Amendment to be enforced.
Who said what?
States "have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the presidency," the Supreme Court said in an unsigned 9-0 opinion. The five-justice majority went too far, unnecessarily attempting to "insulate all alleged insurrectionists from future challenges to their holding federal office," Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson said in a concurring opinion. Trump said he thinks the "very well-crafted" decision "will go a long way toward bringing our country together."
The commentary
Keeping Trump on the ballots is "defensible," but the "bare" 5-4 majority "had no reason to nullify the insurrection clause" other than as a special "unwarranted gift to Donald Trump" and other Jan. 6 "oathbreakers," Mark Joseph Stern said at Slate. This "clear legal win" for Trump also undermined a "central theme" of his campaign, that the courts are "hopelessly corrupt, conflicted and rigged against him," Jonathan Karl said at ABC News.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What next?
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said he's working on a bill to bar insurrectionists from office. Meanwhile, Axios said, the court's ruling "likely opened the door for Jan. 6 rioters to run for federal office."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
July 5 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Saturday’s political cartoons include an extrajudicial detainment camp, 'alligator Alcatraz', and tax cuts for billionaires.
-
5 explosively funny cartoons about the 4th of July
Cartoons Artists take on liberty and justice for all, a terrifying firework, and more
-
Jeff in Venice: a "triumph of tackiness"?
In the Spotlight Locals protest as Bezos uses the city as a 'private amusement park' for his wedding celebrations
-
How will Trump's megabill affect you?
Today's Big Question Republicans have passed the 'big, beautiful bill' through Congress
-
Judge blocks Trump's asylum ban at US border
Speed Read The president violated federal law by shutting down the US-Mexico border to asylum seekers, said the ruling
-
How successful would Elon Musk's third party be?
Today's Big Question Musk has vowed to start a third party after falling out with Trump
-
Thai court suspends prime minister over leaked call
Speed Read Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has been suspended, pending an ethics investigation
-
Senate passes GOP megabill after Alaska side deal
The pivotal yes vote came from Sen. Lisa Murkowski, whose support was secured following negotiated side deals for her home state Alaska
-
U.S. v. Skrmetti: Did the trans rights movement overreach?
Feature The Supreme Court upholds a Tennessee law that bans transgender care for minors, dealing a blow to trans rights
-
How would the Trump administration denaturalize immigrant citizens?
Today's Big Question Using civil courts lowers the burden of proof
-
'Trucking is a dangerous business'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day