Texas migrant law in limbo after Supreme Court OK
The law has been blocked again, mere hours after the Supreme Court allowed the state to arrest migrants


What happened
The Supreme Court voted 6-3 Tuesday to allow Texas to enforce a controversial law that lets state authorities arrest and deport suspected undocumented migrants. A divided three-judge panel at the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals late Tuesday blocked the law, overriding a different three-judge panel that had green-lighted it after a federal judge in Texas ruled it unconstitutional.
Who said what
Letting the law take effect would "upend the longstanding federal-state balance of power and sow chaos" in immigration enforcement, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in her dissent. Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the Supreme Court was not the proper venue to review the 5th Circuit's possible procedural abuses. "Mexico will not accept, under any circumstances, repatriations by the state of Texas," Mexico's foreign ministry said.
The commentary
In the few hours the law, SB4, was not enjoined, "some sheriffs were ready to relish an unprecedented state expansion into border enforcement, while others were reluctant," The Washington Post said. "A lot of the local police chiefs here, we don't believe it will survive a constitutional challenge," said Hidalgo County Sheriff Eddie Guerra. And "we have no training whatsoever to determine whether an individual is here in this country, legally."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What next?
The 5th Circuit panel will hear arguments Wednesday on whether the law should remain suspended while the Justice Department fights to have it struck down. The merits of the case will be litigated in April.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Trump DOJ said to pay $5M to family of Jan. 6 rioter
speed read The US will pay a hefty sum to the family of Capitol rioter Ashli Babbitt, who was fatally shot on January 6
-
Trump DOJ charging House Democrat in ICE fracas
speed read Rep. LaMonica McIver is being charged with assault over a clash outside an immigration detention facility in Newark
-
The horse racing industry is caught up in the migrant debate
Under the Radar At least 78% of the workers on race tracks are reportedly immigrants
-
Biden diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer
speed read The diagnosis hits close to home, as the former president 'dedicated much of his later career to cancer research'
-
Supreme Court weighs court limits amid birthright ban
speed read President Trump's bid to abolish birthright citizenship has sparked questions among federal judges about blocking administration policies
-
Is Starmer's plan to send migrants overseas Rwanda 2.0?
Today's Big Question Failed asylum seekers could be removed to Balkan nations under new government plans
-
Gabbard fires intelligence chiefs after Venezuela report
speed read Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has fired the top two officials leading the National Intelligence Council
-
California may pull health care from eligible undocumented migrants
IN THE SPOTLIGHT After pushing for universal health care for all Californians regardless of immigration status, Gov. Gavin Newsom's latest budget proposal backs away from a key campaign promise