Voting: Trump's plan to overhaul elections
Trump signed an executive order requiring voters to provide proof of citizenship and cutting federal election funding for states that use mail-in ballots

President Trump's "oh-so-fragile ego" compels him to "cast any vote won by an opponent as fraudulent," said Chris Brennan in USA Today. So it's no surprise that he signed an expansive executive order last week that would "rig elections in his favor." Most significantly, the order directs the Election Assistance Commission—a small federal agency— to require citizens who register to vote via a federal form to show proof of citizenship. That would put more than 21 million mostly low-income Americans who lack a passport or other approved document at risk of disenfranchisement. Trump's order "addresses no pressing problem in America," said The Washington Post in an editorial. "Voting experts have routinely demonstrated that illegal voting by noncitizens is exceedingly rare." Georgia, for example, audited its voter rolls last year and found only 20 noncitizens among its 8 million voters. Trump's order also takes aim at mail-in voting, which he has repeatedly claimed unfairly cost him the 2020 election, with a threat to pull federal election funding from the 18 states that count mail ballots sent before but received after Election Day.
Several lawsuits have already been filed against Trump's "amateurish order," said Noah Feldman in Bloomberg, and they're likely to win a block. For starters, the president has no authority over the EAC, an independent body created by Congress in 2002. Secondly, the National Voter Registration Act, a "binding federal law," says you can prove citizenship simply by checking a box saying so under threat of perjury—so you don't need a passport or Real ID driver's license to vote. Sure, the order contains "worrying and legally murky" aspects, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. But there are also "useful presidential prerogatives," including better equipping states to verify voter registration lists and telling the attorney general to prioritize enforcement of voting laws. Still, the Constitution explicitly vests the states with the power to set the rules for federal elections. Both Democrats and Republicans "should be wary of nationalizing voting, if only because neither wants the other in charge."
Trump's order isn't really about election policy, said Ari Berman in Mother Jones. The goal is to sow doubt among Americans about the sanctity of the vote. And even if Trump loses in court, "the order could have dangerous ramifications." A defeat would serve as a pretext for Trump "to make more bogus claims of voter fraud and attempt to overturn future elections." Our democracy is on very shaky ground.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Citizenship: Trump order blocked again
Feature After the Supreme Court restricted nationwide injunctions, a federal judge turned to a class action suit to block Trump's order to end birthright citizenship
-
Loyalty tests: The purge at the FBI
Feature Kash Patel is conducting polygraph tests on FBI agents to weed out anyone speaking badly about him
-
Epstein: Why MAGA won't move on
Feature Trump's supporters are turning on him after he denied the existence of Epstein's client list
-
Arms for Ukraine and an ultimatum for Russia
Feature Donald Trump reverses course, sending weapons to Ukraine and threatening Russia with tariffs
-
Trump officials who hold more than one job
IN THE SPOTLIGHT Wearing multiple hats has become the norm inside a White House known for a revolving door of functionaries and officials
-
Who stands to gain – and lose – from 16-year-old voters?
Today's Big Question Many assume Labour will benefit but move could 'backfire' if Greens, a new hard-left party or Reform continue to pick up momentum
-
Norman Tebbit: fearsome politician who served as Thatcher's enforcer
In the Spotlight Former Conservative Party chair has died aged 94
-
Elon Musk's America Party: a billionaire's folly?
Talking Point One-time Trump ally has acquired a taste for political power and clearly wants more of it