MPs have voted in favour of assisted dying by 330 to 275, in a landmark moment in Parliament, reflecting a profound shift in the issue in England and Wales.
MPs debated – which would give people in England and Wales in certain circumstances the right to choose to end their own life .
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the commentators say?
This was a day "like few others at Westminster", said the BBC's political editor Chris Mason. It was a vote on an issue of "profound social change" as well as "an issue of conscience". Being a free vote, many MPs – over half of whom were elected to Parliament for the first time in July – will have felt "shorn of their usual political compass bearings" when it came to this bill, instead coming "to a very personal decision" on the matter of assisted dying.
But despite the bill passing its second reading, this is simply "the beginning of the arguments rather than the end of them" and it will remain "one of the biggest talking points at Westminster of 2025, with further debates and votes to come".
The debate around assisted dying has been particularly fraught, said Lewis Goodall on the i news site. One whispered theory behind this is "the gulf in religiosity between public and those in public life" – MPs tend to be "more observant of religion than the population at large". While this is perhaps unsurprising – "the devout are often motivated by our better instincts" – it has led to "a mismatch between public and Parliament on some of the fundamentals of how life is conceptualised". Two-thirds of the public support assisted dying, "much more than is reflected in the chamber".
Yet despite the vote, the decision around assisted dying is far from being "set in stone", said Emma Duncan in The Times. In Britain, there have been three big societal changes in the recent past: the decriminalisation of homosexuality, the legalisation of abortion and the protection of trans rights. They show that "liberalisation is not necessarily a one-way street". While gay rights have been increasingly liberalised, abortion laws have on the whole stayed the same for half a century, and we have rowed back on trans rights.
In each of these areas "it is society's experience of how a change in the law has played out that has shaped the subsequent story", said Duncan. "When people perceive that liberalisation has benefited some and harmed nobody, we've gone further. When a change seems to have achieved a reasonable balance of rights, then we stick with it. And when the rights of one group seem to be endangering another's, then we row back."
These stories should "reassure nervous MPs". Changing the law "does not lead inexorably to a dystopian end that we never wished for," said Duncan. "Once we have lived with assisted dying, we will know whether we want to stick with it, extend it or reverse it. It will be up to us."
What next?
This vote is just the first step in a long process: there are still many months of parliamentary debate ahead before the bill has a chance of becoming law. The bill will not return to the Commons until next April.
MPs could vote twice more on the bill, including any amendments and at a third reading, after which it will go to the House of Lords.
-
Political cartoons for December 13Cartoons Saturday's political cartoons include saving healthcare, the affordability crisis, and more
-
Farage’s £9m windfall: will it smooth his path to power?In Depth The record donation has come amidst rumours of collaboration with the Conservatives and allegations of racism in Farage's school days
-
The issue dividing Israel: ultra-Orthodox draft dodgersIn the Spotlight A new bill has solidified the community’s ‘draft evasion’ stance, with this issue becoming the country’s ‘greatest internal security threat’
-
‘Toxic chemicals emitted by those facilities can ravage the human body’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The powerful names in the Epstein emailsIn Depth People from a former Harvard president to a noted linguist were mentioned
-
‘The choice isn’t between domestic and foreign talent; the nation was built on both’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The launch of Your Party: how it could workThe Explainer Despite landmark decisions made over the party’s makeup at their first conference, core frustrations are ‘likely to only intensify in the near-future’
-
What does the fall in net migration mean for the UK?Today’s Big Question With Labour and the Tories trying to ‘claim credit’ for lower figures, the ‘underlying picture is far less clear-cut’
-
‘These attacks rely on a political repurposing’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Pentagon targets Kelly over ‘illegal orders’ videoSpeed Read The Pentagon threatened to recall Kelly to active duty
-
A crowded field of Democrats is filling up the California governor’s raceIn the Spotlight Over a dozen Democrats have declared their candidacy
