How mice with two dads bring us closer to two men having a child of their own

Science breakthrough produces healthy, fertile mice from two sperm cells and an empty egg

Photo composite illustration of a bioscientist filling a test tube, sperm cells, guanine molecules, chromosomes and a mouse
Despite the method's success with mice, its application in humans is a long way off
(Image credit: Illustration by Stephen Kelly / Getty Images / Shutterstock)

Mice with two fathers have, for the first time, gone on to have babies of their own, showing that mice created with two sperm cells can be healthy and fertile – and paving the way to a future in which two men may be able to have a genetically related child.

There are huge barriers to overcome before this could become a reality for humans, but the mouse breakthrough, led by Yanchang Wei at Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China and published in PNAS, is significant: previous attempts, using a different method, weren't able to produce mice that were healthy or fertile.

How did they create mice with two dads?

The scientists put two mouse sperm cells into a mouse egg which had been emptied of its nucleus (where the maternal DNA is contained). Then they used a method called epigenome editing to "reprogramme" parts of the sperm DNA so that it could develop into an embryo. The embryo was then placed into the uterus of a surrogate mouse mother.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

The method produced three living pups, two of which grew to adulthood and were able to mate successfully. However, the process was far from efficient: those two mice were the only ones to survive from the 259 embryos transferred to female surrogates. That's a 0.8% success rate.

What are the scientists trying to achieve?

Unlike previous experiments, which involved genetic modification and deleting sections of DNA, the new epigenome editing method doesn't modify genes but instead controls their activity.

This means it can overcome the issue of genetic imprinting. During the formation of eggs and sperm, imprints (a set of chemical labels) are added to the chromosomes which "pre-programme" some genes to be active and others to be inactive. These imprints are different in maternal chromosomes and paternal chromosomes, and affect development in different ways. So combining genetic material from two parents of the same sex can produce unviable offspring.

In 2004, scientists were able to overcome this genetic imprinting issue to produce embryos from the DNA of two female mice, but achieving the same with two male mice has been much more complicated.

Wei's epigenome editing method allowed his team to target the imprints, adding or removing the chemical labels to reprogramme the genes, rather than modifying the genes themselves.

Can it ever be used on humans?

In theory, yes. The epigenome editing method shows that genetic imprinting can be overcome – and it's a more acceptable method to use on humans than genetic modification (the effects of which are not yet fully understood).

But there are unlikely to be any children born to two fathers in the foreseeable future. Human embryo research is heavily regulated, and the success rate of this research so far is extremely poor.

The new research is "promising", Christophe Galichet at the Sainsbury Wellcome Centre told the New Scientist, but it is currently "unthinkable to translate it to humans" because of the "large number of eggs required, the high number of surrogate women needed and the low success rate".

Richard Windsor is a freelance writer for The Week Digital. He began his journalism career writing about politics and sport while studying at the University of Southampton. He then worked across various football publications before specialising in cycling for almost nine years, covering major races including the Tour de France and interviewing some of the sport’s top riders. He led Cycling Weekly’s digital platforms as editor for seven of those years, helping to transform the publication into the UK’s largest cycling website. He now works as a freelance writer, editor and consultant.