Republicans might be planning an ObamaCare trap for Democrats
Even if Congressional Republicans vote to repeal the Affordable Care Act first thing next year, there's a chance President Obama's signature healthcare law won't actually be going anywhere until 2020. Politico reported Thursday that Republicans are toying with the idea of installing a delayed effective date for the repeal to put a clear deadline on coming up with a replacement plan. "I think once it's repealed, you will have hopefully fewer people playing politics and [instead] coming together to try to find the best policy," House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) told Politico. He also noted that if there is "a date certain that something's going away … you know you have to have something done."
Politico noted this sort of strategy has been used by Congress before, pointing to the "'fiscal cliff' days, when Congress imposed simultaneous deadlines to raise the debt ceiling, extend expiring tax cuts, and fund the government with the intent of creating "irresistible political pressure." Taking this approach with Americans' access to healthcare, however, poses "significant risks," Politico said. Insurance companies could ignore the three-year delay and opt out of ObamaCare as soon as the vote happens, Democrats could refuse to budge — and there's always the chance that a replacement plan won't come to fruition by the time those three years are up.
To read the full story on how the GOP might go about repealing ObamaCare, head over to Politico.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
China and India's dam war in the Himalayas
Under The Radar Delhi's response to Beijing's plans for a huge dam in Tibet? Build a huge dam of its own right nearby
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Born this way
Opinion 'Born here, citizen here' is the essence of Americanism
By Mark Gimein Published
-
What does Trump's immigration crackdown mean for churches?
Today's Big Question Mass deportations come to 'sacred spaces'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Chinese AI chatbot's rise slams US tech stocks
Speed Read The sudden popularity of a new AI chatbot from Chinese startup DeepSeek has sent U.S. tech stocks tumbling
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
US port strike averted with tentative labor deal
Speed Read The strike could have shut down major ports from Texas to Maine
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Biden expected to block Japanese bid for US Steel
Speed Read The president is blocking the $14 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel by Japan's Nippon Steel, citing national security concerns
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Judges block $25B Kroger-Albertsons merger
Speed Read The proposed merger between the supermarket giants was stalled when judges overseeing two separate cases blocked the deal
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Rupert Murdoch loses 'Succession' court battle
Speed Read Murdoch wanted to give full control of his empire to son Lachlan, ensuring Fox News' right-wing editorial slant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Bitcoin surges above $100k in post-election rally
Speed Read Investors are betting that the incoming Trump administration will embrace crypto
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Enron mystery: 'sick joke' or serious revival?
Speed Read 23 years after its bankruptcy filing, the Texas energy firm has announced its resurrection
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
US charges Indian tycoon with bribery, fraud
Speed Read Indian billionaire Gautam Adani has been indicted by US prosecutors for his role in a $265 million scheme to secure solar energy deals
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published