On Thursday, the Department of Homeland Security released a statement opposing a bipartisan immigration deal hammered out by senators Wednesday evening. The deal, which would carve out money for border security and create a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children, was co-sponsored by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — who took issue with the DHS's public opposition.
The DHS is "acting like a political organization intent on poisoning the well" with their rhetoric, Graham said in his own statement. He added that the agency seemed "intent on acting less like a partner and more like an adversary" when it comes to striking a bipartisan immigration deal, and he said that President Trump had been let down by DHS staffers who had "politicized" the agency.
In their statement, the DHS had said that the bipartisan bill "ignores the lesson of 9/11 and significantly increases the risk of crime and terrorism." The statement also asserted that the proposal would "effectively make the [U.S.] a Sanctuary Nation where ignoring the rule of law is encouraged."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Trump instead favors an immigration bill proposed by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), which goes beyond the bipartisan deal by reducing legal immigration and ending the visa lottery. The bill has virtually no chance to pass the Senate, however. When asked Wednesday about the possibility of Trump specifically opposing the bipartisan deal, Graham said, "Then we won't go very far."
Read his full statement below. Kelly O'Meara Morales
-
Supreme Court points to gutting Voting Rights Actspeed read States would no longer be required to consider race when drawing congressional maps
-
‘An exercise of the Republicans justifying their racist positions’instant opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump says he authorized covert CIA ops in VenezuelaSpeed Read He is also considering military strikes inside the country
-
Supreme Court points to gutting Voting Rights Act
speed read States would no longer be required to consider race when drawing congressional maps
-
Trump says he authorized covert CIA ops in Venezuela
Speed Read He is also considering military strikes inside the country
-
‘Vile, racist’ leaked chats roil Young RepublicansSpeed Read Leaders of Young Republican groups made racist, antisemitic and violent comments in private chats
-
Trump ties $20B Argentina bailout to Milei votesspeed read Trump will boost Argentina’s economy — if the country’s right-wing president wins upcoming elections
-
News organizations reject Pentagon restrictionsSpeed Read The proposed policy is Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s latest move to limit press access at the Pentagon
-
Trump declares end to Gaza war, ‘dawn’ of new MideastSpeed Read Hamas freed the final 20 living Israeli hostages and Israel released thousands of Palestinian detainees
-
Trump DOJ indicts New York AG Letitia JamesSpeed Read New York Attorney General Letitia James was indicted as Trump’s Justice Department pursues charges against his political opponents
-
Judge blocks Trump’s Guard deployment in ChicagoSpeed Read The president is temporarily blocked from federalizing the Illinois National Guard or deploying any Guard units in the state
