Blake Masters is betting Republicans won't notice he didn't quite endorse election fraud claims


Blake Masters is going all in: In a new video ad, the candidate for the GOP Senate nomination in Arizona announced he thinks former President Donald "Trump won in 2020."
Masters isn't the only Republican politician to endorse some version of the claim that the presidential election was determined by massive fraud. But the Peter Thiel-backed political novice is among its most visible advocates. He's playing a dangerous game.
The video would be bad enough if Masters believed what he was saying, but the rest of this very ad suggests he doesn't. Right after his profession of faith, Masters changes the subject. Rather than echoing theories of stolen votes or hacked machines, Masters contends Trump would have won if mail-in voting hadn't been expanded and social media platforms hadn't censored damaging stories about then-candidate Joe Biden.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Although it's impossible to test retrospectively, that's not a crazy argument. Along with Thiel alum J.D. Vance, running for a GOP Senate nod in Ohio, Masters presented a longer version of his position in a New York Post op-ed focusing on the ostensible influence of Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg. The problem is there are moral, political, and potentially legal differences between claiming the election was unfair and that it was actually fraudulent. Masters is betting Republican voters and donors won't know the difference.
He could be right. The release of the video seems coordinated with the announcement of a fundraiser with Trump and may have been a condition of the former president's participation. Even if that's not the case, though, the ad is clearly aimed at state attorney general Mark Brnovich, Masters' main rival. Brnovich has overseen several investigations of the 2020 election — including the controversial "audit" that ended up confirming Biden's victory in Arizona — but he's also avoided making specific charges of fraud or malfeasance, earning Trump's wrath.
Whatever its motive, Masters' disgraceful video is characteristic of highbrow populists who see Trump as a vehicle for their own vision of national restoration. Too cautious to endorse conspiracy theories and anti-constitutional violence outright, they imagine they can successfully channel MAGA energies by taking them seriously but not literally. In 2022 and elections to follow, we may find out the hard way whether they're as clever as they think.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Samuel Goldman is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. He is also an associate professor of political science at George Washington University, where he is executive director of the John L. Loeb, Jr. Institute for Religious Freedom and director of the Politics & Values Program. He received his Ph.D. from Harvard and was a postdoctoral fellow in Religion, Ethics, & Politics at Princeton University. His books include God's Country: Christian Zionism in America (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018) and After Nationalism (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021). In addition to academic research, Goldman's writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and many other publications.
-
How will Trump's megabill affect you?
Today's Big Question Republicans have been working to pass the 'big, beautiful bill' through Congress
-
Scientists are the latest 'refugees'
In the spotlight Brain drain to brain gain
-
5 dreamy books to dive into this July
The Week Recommends A 'politically charged' collection of essays, historical fiction goes sci-fi and more
-
IAEA: Iran could enrich uranium 'within months'
Speed Read The chief United Nations nuclear inspector, Rafael Grossi, says Iran could be enriching uranium again soon
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?
today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
Iran nukes program set back months, early intel suggests
Speed Read A Pentagon assessment says US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites only set the program back by months, not years. This contradicts President Donald Trump's claim.
-
Trump gives himself 2 weeks for Iran decision
Speed Read Trump said he believes negotiations will occur in the near future
-
What would a US strike on Iran mean for the Middle East?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION A precise attack could break Iran's nuclear programme – or pull the US and its allies into a drawn-out war even more damaging than Iraq or Afghanistan
-
US says Trump vetoed Israeli strike on Khamenei
Speed Read This comes as Israel and Iran pushed their conflict into its fourth day
-
After Israel's brazen Iran attack, what's next for the region and the world?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Following decades of saber-rattling, Israel's aerial assault on Iranian military targets has pushed the Middle East to the brink of all-out war
-
Why Israel is attacking Iran now
The Explainer A weakened Tehran and a distracted Donald Trump have led Benjamin Netanyahu to finally act against long-standing foe