Digital consent: Law targets deepfake and revenge porn
The Senate has passed a new bill that will make it a crime to share explicit AI-generated images of minors and adults without consent
"The first major U.S. law tackling AI-induced harm" was born out of the suffering of teenage girls, said Andrew R. Chow in Time. "In October 2023, 14-year-old Elliston Berry of Texas and 15-year-old Francesca Mani of New Jersey each learned that classmates had used AI software to fabricate nude images of them and female classmates." The software could create virtually any image with the click of a button, and it was being weaponized against women and girls. When Berry and Mani sought to remove the so-called deepfake images, "both social media platforms and their school boards reacted with silence or indifference." Now a bill is headed to President Trump's desk that will criminalize the nonconsensual sharing of sexually explicit images—both real and computer generated, of minors or adults—and require that platforms remove such material within 48 hours of getting notice. The Take It Down Act, backed by first lady Melania Trump, passed the Senate unanimously and the House 409-2.
"No one expects to be the victim of an obscene deepfake image," said Annie Chestnut Tutor in The Hill. But the odds of it happening are only increasing. Pornographic deepfake videos are "plastered all over the internet," often to "extort teenagers." With AI, "anyone with access to the internet can turn an innocent photo" into life-shattering pornography, said Kayla Bartsch in National Review. This poses a grave danger to young women. While AI deepfakes have gotten a lot of attention for the role they can play in elections, the risk this technology poses to kids has been "largely neglected." But 15 percent of kids "say they know of a nonconsensual intimate image depicting a peer in their school."
The intentions behind this bill may be good, but be wary of the rush to ban AI fakes, said Elizabeth Nolan Brown in Reason. Nobody is defending "revenge porn." But the 48-hour clock to take down images will "incentivize greater monitoring of speech" and could be gamed the same way that copyright law gets abused now to force quick takedowns of material, like parody, that doesn't really violate the law.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Technology is creating new ways to sexualize kids even as non-consensual AI-generated porn gets banned, said Jeff Horwitz in The Wall Street Journal. You can add a whole new category of fakes to watch out for: "digital personas" generated by AI. Meta now lets you interact with fake celebrities or invent AI-powered personas of your own that are happy to engage in "romantic role-play." Users have quickly used the tools to create "sexualized youth-focused personas like 'Submissive Schoolgirl'" that will play out fantasies or even suggest a meeting. The digital characters might be performed by AI, but the ways people interact with them will seep into the real world and affect real kids.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Taps could run dry in drought-stricken TehranUnder the Radar President warns that unless rationing eases water crisis, citizens may have to evacuate the capital
-
Alaska faces earth-shaking loss as seismic monitoring stations shutterIN THE SPOTLIGHT NOAA cuts have left the western seaboard without a crucial resource to measure, understand and predict tsunamis
-
10 great advent calendars for everyone (including the dog)The Week Recommends Countdown with cocktails, jams and Legos
-
Why Trump pardoned crypto criminal Changpeng ZhaoIn the Spotlight Binance founder’s tactical pardon shows recklessness is rewarded by the Trump White House
-
Is AI to blame for recent job cuts?Today’s Big Question Numerous companies have called out AI for being the reason for the culling
-
‘Deskilling’: a dangerous side effect of AI useThe explainer Workers are increasingly reliant on the new technology
-
AI models may be developing a ‘survival drive’Under the radar Chatbots are refusing to shut down
-
Saudi Arabia could become an AI focal pointUnder the Radar A state-backed AI project hopes to rival China and the United States
-
Why Britain is struggling to stop the ransomware cyberattacksThe Explainer New business models have greatly lowered barriers to entry for criminal hackers
-
Wikipedia: Is ‘neutrality’ still possible?Feature Wikipedia struggles to stay neutral as conservatives accuse the site of being left-leaning
-
AI is making houses more expensiveUnder the radar Homebuying is also made trickier by AI-generated internet listings