BUCKINGHAM PALACE announced yesterday that the Queen would not be attending the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM is the unattractive Whitehall acronym) in Sri Lanka in November. She has graced every one with her presence since Ottawa in 1973, the first in the modern post-colonial format. The Prince of Wales will represent her instead. A couple of clever theories are in play: it's a wheeze to puff up the Prince of Wales's profile with Commonwealth leaders, not all of whom think he should succeed as ex-officio Head of the Commonwealth on the death of his mother. It gets the Queen out of a tricky spot given President Mahinda Rajapaksa's possibly dodgy human rights record – the Canadians refuse to have anything to do with him. But it looks simpler than that. Peter Hunt, the BBC's well-informed Royal Correspondent, put it this way: "She is 87. Her husband is in his 90s and I think they have decided and her advisers have decided that they have to acknowledge her advancing age and have to limit her extent of long haul travel." Long-distance air travel is clearly becoming too much. Last week the Duke of Edinburgh arrived in Canada looking exhausted after an eight-hour flight sporting an apparently spontaneous black eye. All observers are agreed that the Queen is passionately interested in three things - horse-racing, dogs (in particular Welsh Corgis) and the Commonwealth. So not going to Sri Lanka is probably a blow for her personally. If this means the end of her global travels it will be a shame, particularly for the Queen's far-flung subjects in the 13 'realm' countries across the globe. Canada, Australia, New Zealand and a clutch of Caribbean islands are merely the most obvious. She is also Queen of a number of countries in the Pacific like Papua New Guinea where she has two official titles in pidgin, the lingua franca of the country – 'Missis Kwin' and 'Mama belong big family'. Fingers crossed that we are still in the 'distant thunder at a picnic' stage of planning for life after Elizabeth II, but clearly it is going to be a wrench. She has always been not just there – but everywhere, the most photographed woman in the world. She was even a re-assuring presence in the Bond films from the start, 50 years before she teamed up with Daniel Craig; in the early films next to Miss Moneypenny's hat-stand was invariably a print of Pietro Annigoni's great romantic portrait of her in Garter robes. All kinds of little background details will change when her reign comes to an end. QCs will become KCs. The successors to Porridge's Fletcher and Godber will be incarcerated in His rather than Her Majesty's Prisons. We will no longer sing God Save the Queen. Actually, it's not a great tune. It could be a good time to substitute Jerusalem or I vow to thee my country as the national anthem. Imagine belting those out at Wembley or Twickenham. Let's hope it's the small changes to long-held habits that will discomfort us most – and nothing worse. History has a habit of turning sour after long reigns by great and loved queens. Young men born in the last years of the Elizabethan era like Cromwell and Charles I became the leaders in a savage civil war which killed through fighting and disease nearly 200,000 – many more if Ireland is included in the butcher's bill.
Three-quarters of a million of those born in the last years of Victoria's reign ended up dying in the trenches – and many of the survivors had to take up arms again in middle age against Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. All the more reason to deplore our national bad manners in expecting her to keep in touch with her realms and peoples across the globe and discharge her duties abroad through air travel alone.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Quiz of The Week: 14 - 20 DecemberHave you been paying attention to The Week's news?
-
Drugmakers paid pharmacy benefit managers to avoid restricting opioid prescriptionsUnder the radar The middlemen and gatekeepers of insurance coverage have been pocketing money in exchange for working with Big Pharma
-
The week's best photosIn Pictures A cyclone's aftermath, a fearless leap, and more
-
King Charles at 75: how the monarch has made his markTalking Point 'Modernising monarch' puts change on hold in first year in favour of stability and continuity
-
Royal family website attacked by Russian hackersSpeed Read Pro-Kremlin group claim responsibility just two weeks after King Charles condemns invasion of Ukraine
-
What have we learned in King Charles’s first year?Today's Big Question The monarch is ‘stamping his personality’ on the role and is definitely not a ‘caretaker’, says Palace source
-
What would the UK be like without a monarchy?Today's Big Question The British public still broadly favours the royals but support is waning among younger people
-
Pros and cons of British colonial reparationsfeature Should the U.K. be forced to pay for its historic subjugations?
-
Coronation protests: did the Met overreact?Talking Point 52 arrests were a ‘direct attack on freedom of speech’ said some commentators
-
The highlights and lowlights from King’s coronation weekendfeature Music, mischief and Penny Mordaunt widely praised, while Met Police arresting protesters provokes criticism
-
Coronation countdown: a ‘tightrope’ for the royal familyUnder the Radar Monarchy to balance celebration with awareness of the complex relationship between British subjects and their ruler
