A row has broken out over who killed Osama bin Laden after an ex-Navy Seal Robert O’Neill said in an interview that contrary to previous claims, it was he who fired the fatal shot.
O'Neill told the Washington Post that he was one of dozens of US special operators who stormed the reclusive leader’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan on 2 May, 2011.
According to O’Neill’s account, he was the first to enter Bin Laden’s room and fired a round that hit the terrorist leader in the forehead, killing him instantly.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
However, the story varies from the description offered by another member of Seal Team Six, Matt Bissonnette, who claims in his controversial 2012 account of the raid, No Easy Day, that he shot and killed Bin Laden.
O’Neill’s new claims reportedly angered other ex-special forces personnel who usually maintain a strict code of silence over their operations. O’Neill had previously been interviewed anonymously about the mission by Esquire magazine, but his decision to reveal his identity publically in a forthcoming interview with Fox News prompted a website run by ex-special forces to publish his name in advance.
The website quotes from a letter signed by force master chief of the Naval Special Warfare Command (NSWC) Michael Magaraci and Rear Admiral Brian Losey. The two men condemn O’Neill and Bissonnette for publicising their roles in the raid.
The post, written by a former CIA officer who goes by the name of Frumentarius says: "Leaving little doubt of the disdain that they, and others in the community, feel toward breaches of the SEAL ethos, Rear Admiral Brian Losey, Commander of NSWC, and Force Master Chief Michael Magaraci state that violators of that ethos 'are neither teammates in good standing, nor teammates who represent Naval Special Warfare.' "
He continues: "They reiterate that a central part of the ethos is not advertising the nature of their work, nor seeking recognition for particular actions."
The US government’s official account of what happened is unlikely to be published for many years, the BBC says.
-
How the FCC’s ‘equal time’ rule worksIn the Spotlight The law is at the heart of the Colbert-CBS conflict
-
What is the endgame in the DHS shutdown?Today’s Big Question Democrats want to rein in ICE’s immigration crackdown
-
‘Poor time management isn’t just an inconvenience’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Epstein files topple law CEO, roil UK governmentSpeed Read Peter Mandelson, Britain’s former ambassador to the US, is caught up in the scandal
-
Iran and US prepare to meet after skirmishesSpeed Read The incident comes amid heightened tensions in the Middle East
-
Israel retrieves final hostage’s body from GazaSpeed Read The 24-year-old police officer was killed during the initial Hamas attack
-
China’s Xi targets top general in growing purgeSpeed Read Zhang Youxia is being investigated over ‘grave violations’ of the law
-
Panama and Canada are negotiating over a crucial copper mineIn the Spotlight Panama is set to make a final decision on the mine this summer
-
Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mineThe Explainer The country’s natural landscape makes the task extremely difficult
-
Iran cuts internet as protests escalateSpeed Reada Government buildings across the country have been set on fire
-
US nabs ‘shadow’ tanker claimed by RussiaSpeed Read The ship was one of two vessels seized by the US military
