Labour’s progressive property tax explained
Party proposes replacing council tax with new levy paid by landlords rather than tenants
Labour is considering replacing council tax with a new “progressive” property tax that would be set nationally and paid by property owners rather than tenants.
The proposals are part of a raft of policy recommendations in a Labour-commissioned report on land use. The aim is to reduce the tax paid by the majority of households and discourage the use of homes as financial assets.
The report - written by a group of academics, economists and land experts and titled Land For The Many - calls on the party to make a string of “radical but practical changes in the way land in the UK is used and governed” if it wins the next election.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“We recommend that a Labour government replace the regressive and unpopular council tax with a progressive property tax based on contemporary property values,” it says. “Unlike council tax, this tax would be payable by owners, not tenants. This would result in significant administrative savings, lower levels of arrears and less court action”, the authors say.
The market value of land in the UK is believed to have quadrupled over the past two decades, contributing to a rise in house prices. A recent study of 14 advanced economies found that an estimated 81% of house price increases between 1950 and 2012 were down to rising land prices.
As well as introducing a progressive property tax, the report calls for the valuation of properties for tax purposes to be updated annually. It also argues that empty homes and second homes should automatically be taxed at a higher rate.
In addition, Labour is considering introducing “compulsory sale orders” giving public authorities the right to seize land left vacant or derelict and to sell it at auction, says The Times.
The new report also suggests abolishing the Stamp Duty Land Tax for people buying homes they intend to live in; abolishing inheritance tax; and the introduction of a lifetime gifts tax levied on the recipient.
“Dig deep enough into many of the problems this country faces, and you will soon hit land,” writes George Monbiot, one of the report authors, in The Guardian.
“Since 1995, land values in this country have risen by 412%. Land now accounts for an astonishing 51% of the UK’s net worth. Why? In large part because successive governments have used tax exemptions and other advantages to turn the ground beneath our feet into a speculative money machine,” he says.
Labour’s shadow Cabinet Office minister Jon Trickett said his party would be “studying these recommendations in detail”.
He added: “So much of this can be traced back to the broken system of land ownership. Concentration of land in the hands of a few has led to unwanted developments, unaffordable house prices, financial crises and environmental degradation.”
But not everyone is convinced. “This is confirmation that Labour would bring the policies of Venezuela to Britain,” Tory MP Priti Patel told the Daily Mail.
Housing Secretary James Brokenshire describing them as a “tax bombshell”. He said: “These proposals are extraordinary and deeply damaging in equal measure. Labour will stop at nothing to hammer families with more tax and make home ownership a pipe dream for future generations.
“Plans to seize land into public ownership also show Labour’s true colours of more and more state control.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The Week Unwrapped: Are we any closer to identifying UFOs?
Podcast Plus, will deals with Tunisia and Kurdistan help Labour? And what next for the Wagner Group?
By The Week Staff Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 16 - 22 November
Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By The Week Staff Published
-
The week's best photos
In Pictures Firing shells, burning ballots, and more
By Anahi Valenzuela, The Week US Published
-
John Prescott: was he Labour's last link to the working class?
Today's Big Quesiton 'A total one-off': tributes have poured in for the former deputy PM and trade unionist
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Labour risking the 'special relationship'?
Today's Big Question Keir Starmer forced to deny Donald Trump's formal complaint that Labour staffers are 'interfering' to help Harris campaign
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Men in Gray suits: why the plots against Starmer's top adviser?
Today's Big Question Increasingly damaging leaks about Sue Gray reflect 'bitter acrimony' over her role and power struggle in new government
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Tax plans spell trouble in the North Sea
Talking Point Labour’s tax plans are whipping up a storm. Are the worries of opponents justified?
By The Week UK Published