Will Mueller's testimony damage President Trump?
With former special counsel set to testify live on television, will Democrats land a blow on the president, or will their efforts backfire?
Late on Tuesday, Democrats from the US Congress revealed that, after weeks of negotiations, Robert S. Mueller III had agreed to face questions on his Special Counsel Report - live on television - before two House committees.
While the testimony, scheduled for July 17, has been a cause for excitement for Trump’s opponents, it should be remembered that in Mueller’s sole public appearance he was clear: he was reluctant to testify, because the report “speaks for itself”, and if he did, he “would not provide information beyond that which is already public.”
In short, Mueller will likely continue his policy of simply reading from the report, the redacted form of which is already available for anyone to read.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Given this, is there any chance the testimony will hurt the president politically, or will he prove as impervious as ever?
How the Testimony will work
Mueller will sit for four sessions. The House Intelligence Committee will focus on volume I of the report, which is concerned with collusion and conspiracy with the Russian government. The House Judiciary Committee will focus on volume II, which deals with whether or not the president obstructed justice.
Both committees will sit for one public, televised session on the redacted report, and a closed hearing that will focus on the full, unredacted report.
Why are Democrats so determined to question Mueller in public?
While there are varying motivations driving the Democrat and Republican committee members who will question Mueller, there is a consensus that the testimony will be less about obtaining new information, and more about narrative control. Fundamentally, Trump’s critics believe the report is damaging, but that its density and length mean the vast majority of Americans will only be exposed to it through the media.
“The hearings are certain to draw serious media attention, which at least gives Democrats a high-profile way to illustrate the report’s main findings – which are far more damning than Trump’s ‘no collusion, no obstruction’ mantra suggests,” Jonathan Bernstein reflects in Bloomberg. “Because of the way information now spreads, the testimony could have a greater impact than the publication of the report itself. Even reading the main conclusions out loud will help whatever audience tunes in... have a better sense of the full weight of the findings.”
Democrats say that the narrative around the report was hijacked, when Trump’s Attorney General William Barr released a summary prior to its release. As Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, the Judiciary Committee chairman, said, “Barr led a campaign of misinformation to deceive the American people about what was in the report. The president joined in by repeatedly saying ‘no collusion, no obstruction’ — which is not what the report found.”
However, Democrats will also try to extract from Mueller his opinion on certain matters. As the LA Times points out, the report “left unanswered questions, most notably whether Mueller would have accused Trump of obstruction of justice if the Justice Department hadn’t decided that a sitting president couldn’t be indicted. The report mentioned that long-standing policy, but it left unclear whether Mueller believed that, in the absence of such a directive, he would have concluded that Trump committed a crime.
CNN reports that there are 79 House Democrats calling for an impeachment inquiry into Trump. For them the stakes are high: “Mueller's appearance amounts to a make-or-break moment for the House impeachment caucus. If the special counsel's testimony falls flat or doesn't change minds, it could deflate the momentum for impeachment.”
Republican goals
“Republicans will try to cast their political opponents as intent on impeaching the president and unwilling to let go of an investigation that ended months ago without charges against Trump,” says the Washington Post, “while some are likely attack Mueller for his team’s perceived missteps.”
As Douglas A. Collins of Georgia, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said, he believed Mueller’s testimony would “bring to House Democrats the closure that the rest of America has enjoyed for months.”
The risk for Democrats
If Mueller gives Democrats what they want, this could be the moment the special counsel's report finally damages the president politically. However, if Mueller is reticent or uncooperative, and does not provide any newsworthy comments or information, Democrats run the risk of looking foolish - even conniving - in their attempt to keep the report in the public sphere.
The New York Times reports that “Several Republicans predicted on Wednesday that the appearance would backfire on Democrats trying to damage Mr. Trump.”
As one senior Democrat aide said anonymously to the Washington Post: “This can backfire. Big time.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
William Gritten is a London-born, New York-based strategist and writer focusing on politics and international affairs.
-
Israel and Hamas reach long awaited Gaza ceasefire
The Explainer After more than a year of violence that has left tens of thousands dead and pushed the Middle East toward broader regional war, negotiators say an end is in sight
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Hang 10 at El Zonte, a surfer's paradise in El Salvador
The Week Recommends Catch some waves and a great cup of coffee
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
'The world is watching this deal closely'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Hegseth boosts hopes for confirmation amid grilling
Speed Read The Senate held confirmation hearings for Pete Hegseth, Trump's Defense Secretary nominee
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Biden removes Cuba from terrorism blacklist
Speed read The move is likely to be reversed by the incoming Trump administration, as it was Trump who first put Cuba on the terrorism blacklist in his first term
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Unprepared for a pandemic
Opinion What happens if bird flu evolves to spread among humans?
By William Falk Published
-
Elise Stefanik is poised to take aim at the UN for Donald Trump
In the spotlight The combative congresswoman and close Trump ally is expected to challenge the United Nations
By David Faris Published
-
'His disdain for international rules could eviscerate the laws of war'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
House GOP unveils bill for Trump to buy Greenland
Speed Read The bill would allow the U.S. to purchase the Danish territory — or procure it through economic or military force
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
DOJ releases Trump Jan. 6 special counsel report
Speed Read Jack Smith's report details the president-elect's "criminal efforts to retain power" amid the 2020 election
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Will 2025 bring an Iran crisis for Trump?
Today's Big Question Tehran's nuclear program remains a concern
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published