Trump impeachment: ‘multiple’ whistleblowers come forward
President under mounting pressure, after reports another source has corroborated Ukraine allegations
The impeachment case against US President Donald Trump took another extraordinary turn yesterday, amid reports that “multiple” whistleblowers have come forward in connection with claims Trump pressured the president of Ukraine to investigate his political rival Joe Biden.
The news came via lawyers representing the original whistleblower at the centre of the political storm. Attorney Andrew Bakaj told the Washington Post that a second whistleblower has spoken to the inspector general of the intelligence community, and the person has “first hand knowledge that supported the first whistleblower”.
ABC broke the story yesterday:
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“I can confirm that my firm and my team represent multiple whistleblowers in connection to the underlying August 12, 2019, disclosure to the Intelligence Community Inspector General,” wrote Bakaj, in a tweet. “No further comment at this time.”
Another member of the legal team, Mark Zaid, corroborated the claim.
Some Republicans were quick to downplay the significance of the revelation. “It does not matter,” Chris Stewart, a Republican member of the House Intelligence Committee told Fox News Sunday. “This person is going to come forward and say, yep the president had this phone call,” he said. “And yep, that's the transcript. Why should I care at all what his opinion and judgment of this transcript is? You and I can read it.”
The impeachment inquiry is examining evidence that Trump withheld security assistance funds and a White House visit from President Volodymyr Zelensky until he agreed to open investigations into Joe Biden and his son Hunter regarding their business dealings in Ukraine.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues free–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Writing in the Washington Post, Joe Biden ended a period of silence on Trump’s attempts to start an investigation into his conduct in Ukraine, retaliating strongly:
“To Trump and those who facilitate his abuses of power, and all the special interests funding his attacks against me: Please know that I’m not going anywhere. You won’t destroy me, and you won’t destroy my family. And come November 2020, I intend to beat you like a drum.”
The case builds
Text messages between senior diplomats also suggest that Ukraine was pressed to investigate an unfounded conspiracy theory that Ukraine, not Russia, interfered in the 2016 US presidential campaign.
Tomorrow, Gordon Sondland, a hotel magnate and major Trump donor who was made US ambassador to the European Union in June last year, will testify to Congress after bombshell text messages revealed his involvement in the meetings and negotiations that led up to the Trump-Zelensky call of 25 July.
In texts with Bill Taylor, the top American diplomat in the US embassy in Kiev, Sondland addresses Taylor’s concerns. “Are we now saying that security assistance and a [White House] meeting are conditioned on investigations?” Taylor asked. Sondland responded: “Call me.”
However, later, on 1 September - after the White House learnt of the nature of the whistleblower complaint against the president - Sondland denied the interpretation.
Taylor wrote: “As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.” Sondland responded that Taylor was “incorrect about President Trump’s intentions” and “the President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s [sic] of any kind.”
A president at war
“It doesn’t matter how many people decide to call themselves whistleblowers about the same telephone call — a call the president already made public — it doesn’t change the fact that he has done nothing wrong,” said Stephanie Grisham, the White House press secretary.
The President and his team remain defiant:
However, The Guardian reports on a White House that is notably lacking people coming to its defence. “Trump’s would-be defenders in the Republican ranks, with the notable exception of two figures who themselves are deeply implicated in the Ukraine affair – secretary of state Mike Pompeo and Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani – have fallen mostly silent,” writes Tom McCarthy.
“No Trump defender from the White House appeared on the US Sunday morning news shows, nor did any members of the congressional Republican political leadership.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
William Gritten is a London-born, New York-based strategist and writer focusing on politics and international affairs.
-
Damian Barr shares his favourite books
The Week Recommends The writer and broadcaster picks works by Alice Walker, Elif Shafak and others
By The Week UK Published
-
The Great Mughals: a 'treasure trove' of an exhibition
The Week Recommends The V&A's new show is 'spell-binding'
By The Week UK Published
-
Big Tech critic Brendan Carr is Trump's FCC pick
In the Spotlight The next FCC commissioner wants to end content moderation practices on social media sites
By David Faris Published
-
John Prescott: was he Labour's last link to the working class?
Today's Big Quesiton 'A total one-off': tributes have poured in for the former deputy PM and trade unionist
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published