Could Russia interfere in the UK election?
Boris Johnson accused of suppressing report assessing security threat posed by Kremlin-sponsored disinformation
Boris Johnson has been accused of suppressing a secret report assessing the security threat posed by Russian interference in British politics and whether a future general election could be affected by Kremlin-sponsored disinformation.
The former attorney general Dominic Grieve has said it is unacceptable for the prime minister to “sit on” a dossier compiled by the intelligence and security committee.
Their investigation, launched after the revelation that Russia-based Twitter accounts posted more than 45,000 messages about Brexit in just 48 hours during the 2016 referendum, concluded two weeks ago but Downing Street has refused to agree it will be published before the general election on 12 December.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“Parliament and the public ought to have, and must have, access to this report in light of the forthcoming election and it's really unacceptable for the prime minister to sit on it and deny them that information,” Grieve told the Commons.
Labour’s Barry Sheerman added to the criticism of the government, asking: “Are they trying to hide something here?”
Both Johnson and his predecessor Theresa May, have declined to say whether Russia had interfered in Brexit, amid conflicting assessments from government bodies over the impact of misinformation and social media messaging on British politics.
In 2018, Andrew Parker, director of MI5, said in reference to the EU referendum he was “not aware of any information suggesting that the outcome was determined by any sort of interference.”
However, in a report issued earlier this year, the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport parliamentary committee challenged that assessment.
The British government “cannot state definitively that there was ‘no evidence of successful interference’ in our democratic process, as the term ‘successful’ is impossible to define in retrospect,” it reported. “There is, however, strong evidence that points to hostile state actors influencing democratic processes,” the committee said, adding that anti-EU articles about the referendum circulated by Russian-backed media outlets RT and Sputnik had a much wider “social reach” than similar content posted by official pro-Leave Brexit campaign websites.
Despite acknowledging Russian interference in elections “in a number of countries in Europe”, May’s government was repeatedly criticised for failing to properly investigate foreign influence and voter manipulation in the Brexit vote.
The Independent says that “no wide-ranging inquiry took place, despite the Vote Leave campaign, fronted by Johnson and Michael Gove, being found by the Electoral Commission to have broken the law”.
“Downing Street also fought off calls for a ‘Mueller-style’ inquiry, on the scale of the US probe into alleged collusion with Russia by Donald Trump’s presidential campaign,” says the news site.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues for £6–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Before the 2017 general election, Ciaran Martin, the Chief Executive of GCHQ’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), penned a letter to all main party leaders warning that British political processes were at risk of interference by Kremlin-backed cyber-criminals.
In May, EU officials accused Russia of using disinformation to influence the outcome of the European Parliament elections. The BBC reported that EU officials believed the Kremlin has “for years been using disinformation to sow discord and confusion across Europe, while undermining voters' trust in the European Union and its democracies”.
Calling cyberwarfare by Russia “an existential threat to British Democracy”, Ewan McGaughey writing on LSE’s website called for Parliament to pass a new Democracy Protection Act. This would require all personal data held by political organisations, other than that freely given in door knocking and phone calls, to be deleted; all major social media companies, particularly Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, to delete bots which are not verifiably a human being or a legitimate entity; and ban foreign political donations.
The government had been keen to implement a digital imprints regime for online election campaign material by the end of 2019, with the aim of increasing awareness of disinformation and making elections more transparent, “but while British government officials and politicians have extensively discussed tightening laws governing who can register to vote and how politically related advertising and social media promotions could be regulated, they so far have done little to implement such election security measures”, reports Reuters.
Now with an election looming, officials speaking to the news agency have warned Britain does not have time to implement measures to resist the sort of social media and fake news campaigns involving suspected foreign actors that have affected other Western nations.
In the absence of any government action, social media companies have taken the issue into their hands. This week Twitter announced it was banning political advertising on its platform, sparking calls for Facebook to follow suit.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Today's political cartoons - November 2, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - anti-fascism, early voter turnout, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Geoff Capes obituary: shot-putter who became the World’s Strongest Man
In the Spotlight The 'mighty figure' was a two-time Commonwealth Champion and world-record holder
By The Week UK Published
-
Israel attacks Iran: a 'limited' retaliation
Talking Point Iran's humiliated leaders must decide how to respond to Netanyahu's measured strike
By The Week UK Published
-
Life in the post-truth era
Opinion The mainstream media can't hold back a tsunami of misinformation
By Theunis Bates Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
California's new AI regulations are cracking down on political deepfakes
Under the radar In the age of generative AI, there is a lot of sophisticated fake content floating around the web
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
FBI probes cyberattacks on Trump, Harris campaigns
Speed Read The FBI is investigating claims that sensitive documents pertaining to Donald Trump's presidential campaign were stolen in a cyber intrusion
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published