Chinese consulate closed by Trump ‘was hotbed of spying’
Former CIA station chief says the move marks the beginning of a 21st-century cold war

A Chinese consulate in Texas, which Donald Trump ordered to be shut down yesterday, was a “hotbed” of foreign espionage, according to US officials.
The decision to close the Houston office was made “without warning, and without explanation”, the Daily Mail reports. It became public hours after officials were spotted burning paperwork in the building’s courtyard.
Firefighters and police rushed to the scene, but were allegedly blocked from accessing the compound as staff continued to destroy documents and information.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It is unclear whether a single incident provoked the closure. The consulate has a history of engaging in “subversive behaviour”, a State Department policy analyst told The New York Times.
Describing it as the “epicentre of research theft in the United States”, David R. Stilwell said diplomats connected to the consulate, including the senior Chinese official stationed there, had used false identification to escort Chinese citizens through American airports.
The US State Department said China has “engaged for years in massive illegal spying and influence operations throughout the United States against US government officials and American citizens”, the Financial Times reports.
Daniel Hoffman, a former CIA station chief, said the espionage and closure were “the bellwethers of a 21st-century cold war”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The Chinese Embassy in Washington rejected the US accusations as “groundless fabrications”.
Wang Wenbin, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, urged the US to reverse a decision which he said “seriously violates international law and basic norms of international relations”.
“Infiltration and interference is never in the genes and tradition of China’s foreign policy,” he added.
-
Violent videos of Charlie Kirk’s death are renewing debate over online censorship
Talking Points Social media ‘promises unfiltered access, but without guarantees of truth and without protection from harm’
-
What led to Poland invoking NATO’s Article 4 and where could it lead?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION After a Russian drone blitz, Warsaw’s rare move to invoke the important NATO statute has potentially moved Europe closer to continent-wide warfare
-
Africa could become the next frontier for space programs
The Explainer China and the US are both working on space applications for Africa
-
What will bring Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table?
Today’s Big Question With diplomatic efforts stalling, the US and EU turn again to sanctions as Russian drone strikes on Poland risk dramatically escalating conflict
-
How long can Nato keep Donald Trump happy?
Today's Big Question Military alliance pulls out all the stops to woo US president on his peacemaker victory lap
-
How far would Russia go for Iran?
Today's Big Question US air strikes represent an 'embarrassment, provocation and opportunity' all rolled into one for Vladimir Putin
-
How the Israel-Iran conflict broke out
The Explainer Israel's strike on Iran's nuclear and missile programmes was years in the planning
-
What happens if Israel attacks Iran?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Israel is 'ready to strike' and Tehran has plans for counterattacks against the US as nuclear talks appear deadlocked
-
Is Israel finally feeling the heat on Gaza?
Today's Big Question Benjamin Netanyahu allows aid to resume amid mounting international pressure and growing internal turmoil
-
Ukraine-Russia: is peace deal possible after Easter truce?
Today's Big Question 'Decisive week' will tell if Putin's surprise move was cynical PR stunt or genuine step towards ending war
-
Is it safe to share state secrets with the US?
Today's Big Question Accidental top-level leak stokes security concerns from America's allies