Coronavirus: are false positive Covid-19 tests skewing infection rate figures?
Mass testing combined with a low level of genuine cases can lead to misleading results

A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
As concern grows about new outbreaks of Covid-19 across several European countries, scientists - and hopeful holidaymakers - are poring over coronavirus test data.
But even though the tests used by the NHS and other European health services are considered highly reliable by international standards, “it’s surprisingly hard to determine how accurate a coronavirus test is”, says Maureen Ferran, associate professor of biology at New York’s Rochester Institute of Technology, in an article on The Conversation.
When overall infection rates are low, as they are still in the UK and most of the rest of Europe, the risk of false positives - that is, people who don’t have the disease being told that they do - can be significant.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“If only 5% of a population have the coronavirus, a test with 95% specificity would result in a 50% chance of a false positive,” Ferran says.
What about false negative results?
False negatives - when people are told they don’t have the disease but actually do - can be even more serious, since the people in question may be released from hospital or quarantine while still infectious.
However, “the impact of false negatives is greatest when the absolute risk of infection is high”, according to a government research paper published in June. As the proportion of the population with the virus decreases, it becomes less likely that a faulty test will coincide with someone who should test positive.
As a precaution, though, someone showing Covid-19 symptoms is likely to be treated as infectious even if they test negative.
Why does the false positive rate rise as infections fall?
Even though overall test accuracy should be consistent over time, the probability that an individual test gives the correct answer will depend on the infection rate at the time.
Imagine, says The Spectator, a population in which 0.1% of the population has Covid-19, and a test which gives true positive results 80% of the time and true negative results 99.9% of the time.
“In this scenario, 10,000 random people go for a Covid-19 test,” the magazine explains. “With the infection level at 0.1%, just ten people will have Sars-CoV-2 and 9,990 will not.
“Of the ten who turn up with an infection, 80% will test positive, meaning eight people will be correctly identified while two walk away with a false negative.
“And of the 9,990 not infected, all but ten will be correctly diagnosed as negative: hence the success rate of 99.9%. But ten will be told they have Covid-19, when in fact they don’t.”
The result is 18 positive tests, “eight from people who genuinely had the virus and ten who did not” - so fewer than half of the positive diagnoses are correct.
What are the numbers now?
According to Ferran, a research centre in Geneva found that five Covid-19 tests widely used in Europe provided accurate results for 100% of people who did have the virus and 96% of people who did not. That would mean 4% of people who did not have Covid-19 would receive a false positive.
After reviewing data from British testing centres, the government research paper released last month estimated that the UK’s false positive rate has a 50% chance of sitting somewhere between 0.8% and 4%.
However, the authors go on to say that, given the data from the end of May, the rate “cannot exceed 1.6%” and is “likely to be much lower”.
The researchers use 0.4% as the false positive rate, which means that on a day when more than 100,000 tests were carried out, more than 400 false positives would be expected.
Over the past week, the UK has been carrying out, on average, about 130,000 tests per day, which have returned about 675 positive results per day.
What are the implications?
False positive results have both personal and national consequences.
The example above would lead to “400 people being isolated when they are well, and much wasted effort in contact tracing”, the government research explains.
It also has implications for how we interpret the data. “Going off current testing practices and results, Covid-19 might never be shown to disappear,” says The Spectator.
On the other hand, some people who are infected with the virus are never tested, so there are unknowns on both sides of the equation.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Holden Frith is The Week’s digital director. He also makes regular appearances on “The Week Unwrapped”, speaking about subjects as diverse as vaccine development and bionic bomb-sniffing locusts. He joined The Week in 2013, spending five years editing the magazine’s website. Before that, he was deputy digital editor at The Sunday Times. He has also been TheTimes.co.uk’s technology editor and the launch editor of Wired magazine’s UK website. Holden has worked in journalism for nearly two decades, having started his professional career while completing an English literature degree at Cambridge University. He followed that with a master’s degree in journalism from Northwestern University in Chicago. A keen photographer, he also writes travel features whenever he gets the chance.
-
Fixing the NHS workforce
The Explainer There are roughly 112,000 vacant posts in NHS England with nearly one in ten posts unfilled
By The Week Staff Published
-
You can now get a new Covid booster shot. Should you?
Unless you are old or otherwise at high risk, it isn't a 'slam dunk'
By Peter Weber Published
-
Surgery faces ‘MeToo moment’ as female staff assaulted while operating
Two-thirds of women surgeons claim to have been sexually harassed and a third alleged assaults
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Is it time to mask up again?
Today's Big Question A rise in Covid-19 cases brings back the possibility of mask mandates
By Joel Mathis Published
-
What does UK’s first womb transplant mean for future of fertility?
Today's Big Question Procedure could be offered more widely including to transgender people
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
The NHS plan for virtual wards to beat winter crisis
feature Patients with respiratory infections to be given wearable devices that allow doctors to monitor them at home
By The Week Staff Published
-
Understanding the new Covid-19 variant, Eris
Speed Read The formally named EG.5 is making the rounds, but we don't have to worry just yet
By Devika Rao Published
-
The new Covid variant Eris behind a rise in cases this summer
feature Concerns over ’flying blind’ as routine testing is no longer freely available and less data is being collected
By Felicity Capon Published