US election: what is Supreme Court packing - and will Joe Biden do it?
Democratic candidate walks tightrope on expanding America’s highest court

Having dodged the issue for several weeks, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has promised to give a clear position on “Supreme Court packing” before election day.
During a televised town hall event last Thursday, Donald Trump’s challenger said he would base his policy on how the Rupublicans handle the confirmation process for Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the seat left open by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Biden told the audience at the meeting in Philadelphia that he is “not a fan” of court packing. But when pressed by moderator George Stephanopoulos about whether he would consider increasing the number of Supreme Court justices, the would-be president replied: “I’m open to considering what happens from that point on.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What is court packing?
Court packing involves expanding the Supreme Court beyond its current count of nine justices. Some US progressives have floated it as a future policy to balance the court’s ideological make-up if, as expected, Barrett’s nomination is confirmed in a vote by the US Senate Judiciary Committee on 22 October.
If Barrett takes up the seat, it will “solidify a 6-3 conservative majority on the court”, says CBS News. Democrats have tried to delay the process, insisting that the seat should be held open until after the election, as was the case when conservative judge Antonin Scalia died just before the end of Barack Obama’s presidency.
But with the Republicans steaming ahead with their plans, the once “fringe idea” of court packing has “suddenly come into the mainstream”, says the Financial Times.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Will Biden do it?
Biden insisted in July last year that he was opposed to court packing, and warned that the Democrats would “live to rue” any such move.
But his current evasiveness on the matter shows the “the tightrope he is walking on” as the clock ticks down until voters go to the polls on 3 November, says the FT.
“The bottom line is that [Biden] feels he’s in a really good position right now and he really doesn’t want to do anything to rock the boat,” said US political strategist Jim Manley.
“If he says he’s for court packing, that gives the Republicans just another target to go after him, and if he opposes it, the left is going to be unhappy.”
The issue is “tricky politics” for the Biden campaign, agrees The Washington Post.
On the one hand, adding a left-leaning justice would allow a Biden-led administration to “push back against potential legal challenges to abortion, LGBT rights, voting rights, climate change regulations - nearly everything they hold dear”, but on the other, “it could play into Republican attacks that the Democratic Party is extreme”.
The paper predicts that ultimately, the Democrats may opt to “split the difference”, by coming out against court packing, but in favour of other Supreme Court reforms such as term limits for justices.
Arion McNicoll is a freelance writer at The Week Digital and was previously the UK website’s editor. He has also held senior editorial roles at CNN, The Times and The Sunday Times. Along with his writing work, he co-hosts “Today in History with The Retrospectors”, Rethink Audio’s flagship daily podcast, and is a regular panellist (and occasional stand-in host) on “The Week Unwrapped”. He is also a judge for The Publisher Podcast Awards.
-
September 6 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Saturday’s political cartoons include profiting from authoritarianism, and the National Guard entering the CDC
-
Should Britain withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights?
Talking Point With calls now coming from Labour grandees as well as Nigel Farage and the Tories, departure from the ECHR 'is starting to feel inevitable'
-
5 outspoken cartoons about Epstein survivors taking center stage
Cartoons Artists take on cover-ups, Trump surrounded, and more
-
Why are Trump's health rumors about more than just presidential fitness?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Extended absences and unexplained bruises have raised concerns about both his well-being and his administration's transparency
-
'The McDonald's menu board is one fascinating thing'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
DC sues Trump to end Guard 'occupation'
Speed Read D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues that the unsolicited military presence violates the law
-
Epstein accusers urge full file release, hint at own list
speed read A rally was organized by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who are hoping to force a vote on their Epstein Files Transparency Act
-
Court hands Harvard a win in Trump funding battle
Speed Read The Trump administration was ordered to restore Harvard's $2 billion in research grants
-
Why reports of Donald Trump's demise are greatly exaggerated
In The Spotlight US president has once again brushed aside rumours that he's dead
-
US kills 11 on 'drug-carrying boat' off Venezuela
Speed Read Trump claimed those killed in the strike were 'positively identified Tren de Aragua Narcoterrorists' shipping drugs to the US
-
Trump vows to send federal forces to Chicago, Baltimore
Speed Read The announcement followed a California judge ruling that Trump's LA troop deployment was illegal