The results of Thursday’s local elections failed to produce a clear winner, with Labour and the Conservatives neck and neck in the BBC’s projected national vote share.
So what would happen if the UK voted on parliamentary seats tomorrow?
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The latest polls give the Tories a very narrow lead. When YouGov asked 1,585 adults which party they would vote for in an election tomorrow, 29% said Conservative, 28% said Labour and 6% said the Liberal Democrats.
The survey, commissioned by The Times, found that 37% of voters thought Theresa May would make a better prime minister than Corbyn, while 27% thought the opposite. The remainder were unsure.
If the local election results were replicated in a general election, there would be a hung parliament, says Sky News.
According to a projection by the broadcaster’s elections analyst Michael Thrasher, the Conservatives would have 296 seats, Labour 270, the SNP 35, the Lib Dems 26 and other parties 23.
“Labour did not achieve the gains on 3 May typically required to be confident of forming a government at the next general election, let alone winning a majority,” says the New Statesman. But the magazine says the Tories would be complacent to think the UK had reached “peak Corbyn”.
The New Statesman points out that Labour has achieved its best result in London since 1971. It says the party realises it now needs to focus on provincial towns.
The Ukip vote seems to have “unwound to the Tories but not us”, says LabourList, with a “rather disappointing performance in Leave-voting middle-sized towns and post-industrial areas in the Midlands and North”.
The site notes that the Lib Dems are also making a “limited recovery” of the territory they held in big cities before the coalition.
“Unfortunately we can’t win a general election without winning in areas like Amber Valley, Nuneaton, Redditch and Worcester,” it concludes.
-
Tips for surviving loneliness during the holiday season — with or without peoplethe week recommends Solitude is different from loneliness
-
‘This is where adaptation enters’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
4 signs you have too much credit card debtthe explainer Learn to recognize the red flags
-
Will the public buy Rachel Reeves’s tax rises?Today’s Big Question The Chancellor refused to rule out tax increases in her televised address, and is set to reverse pledges made in the election manifesto
-
Five takeaways from Plaid Cymru’s historic Caerphilly by-election winThe Explainer The ‘big beasts’ were ‘humbled’ but there was disappointment for second-placed Reform too
-
The Chinese threat: No. 10’s evidence leads to more questionsTalking Point Keir Starmer is under pressure after collapsed spying trial
-
Taking the low road: why the SNP is still standing strongTalking Point Party is on track for a fifth consecutive victory in May’s Holyrood election, despite controversies and plummeting support
-
The end of ‘golden ticket’ asylum rightsThe Explainer Refugees lose automatic right to bring family over and must ‘earn’ indefinite right to remain
-
The Liberal Democrats: on the march?Talking Point After winning their highest number of seats in 2024, can the Lib Dems marry ‘stunts’ with a ‘more focused electoral strategy’?
-
Is Andy Burnham making a bid to replace Keir Starmer?Today's Big Question Mayor of Manchester on manoeuvres but faces a number of obstacles before he can even run
-
Angela Rayner: the rise and fall of a Labour stalwartIn the Spotlight Deputy prime minister resigned after she underpaid £40,000 in stamp duty
