Is the UK spending enough on defence?
Commons report says Britain must boost military capabilities to avoid losing influence with allies
The row over UK’s defence spending is growing as a new report by MPs warns that the country faces being left behind unless more money is pumped into the Armed Forces.
The Commons Defence Committee report says the UK’s defence budget needs to rise from 2% of GDP (£40bn) to 3% (£60bn) if Britain is to maintain its influence in the global sphere.
Labour’s Nia Griffith, the shadow defence secretary, “outflanked Theresa May on defence yesterday”, says The Times, by pledging her party’s commitment to retaining the UK’s status as a “tier one” military power.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The prime minister came under attack from some members of her own party last week when she refused to confirm that the UK would remain a “tier one” military nation - a defence term referring to the full spectrum of military capabilities, including nuclear weapons, says The Guardian.
What does the UK spend currently?
According to Nato, the UK spent 2.14% of GDP on defence in 2017, “comfortably more than the minimum target of 2% first set by former chancellor George Osborne in 2015 and reiterated in last year’s Conservative election manifesto”, reports the Financial Times.
The Ministry of Defence, which spent £39.7bn on defence in total last year, has faced a series of cuts since 2010.
Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson is demanding that an extra £20bn be spent, in line with the new report’s findings - a demand that threatens the PM’s position.
How does this spending compare with that of the UK’s neighbours?
European members of Nato have long been accused of shirking their financial commitment to the military alliance. According to Nato’s own estimates, only Romania, Poland, Greece and Estonia managed to meet the 2% of GDP target, along with the UK, in 2017.
Nato Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said earlier this year that he was encouraged by the number of alliance countries that were edging closer to the symbolic 2% target.
But he also acknowledged that based on current projections, only 15 states - barely half the 29-strong alliance’s membership - would reach the milestone by 2024.
“This is substantial progress and a good start,” Stoltenberg said. “But we still have a good way to go.”
At next month’s Nato summit in Brussels, US President Donald Trump is expected to repeat his demands for European allies to spend more on defence.
Both France and Germany are expected to boost defence spending over the coming years. In February, French President Emmanuel Macron reversed a decade of defence budget cuts by approving nearly €300bn (£264bn) in spending for the military.
What does the defence committee report say?
Committee member Madeleine Moon, Labour MP for Bridgend, says the UK’s Armed Forces have been “hollowed out”, leaving the Navy “very weak” and air capability “diminished”.
She told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “Influence is really important because unless you can back it up with capability, you have no credibility.”
The committee has warned that British forces would struggle to operate alongside the US military without increased investment.
The BBC’s Jonathan Beale says the MPs’ report will “add fuel to what seems to be an increasingly acrimonious row between the defence secretary, Gavin Williamson, and the Treasury and the prime minister”.
A government spokesperson said: “We have been clear we will continue to exceed Nato’s 2% spending target.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Why ghost guns are so easy to make — and so dangerous
The Explainer Untraceable, DIY firearms are a growing public health and safety hazard
By David Faris Published
-
The Week contest: Swift stimulus
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
'It's hard to resist a sweet deal on a good car'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Experts call for a Nato bank to 'Trump-proof' military spending
Under The Radar A new lender could aid co-operation and save millions of pounds, say think tanks
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
What would happen if Russia declared war on Nato?
In depth Response to an attack on UK or other Western allies would be 'overwhelming'
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Last updated
-
What can Ukraine gain from Russia incursion?
Today's Big Question Gamble to boost morale, improve negotiating position and show the West it can still win is 'paying off – for now'
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
British defence: the crisis in the Armed Forces
Talking Point Depleted military power may not be able to meet its own commitment to up defence spending to 2.5%
By The Week UK Published
-
British Armed Forces personnel details 'hacked by China'
Speed Read The Ministry of Defence became aware of the breach 'several days ago'
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
What would happen if World War Three started?
In depth With conflicts in Ukraine, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific, the 'spark' that could ignite all-out war 'already exists'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Labour and nuclear weapons: a turbulent ideological history
The Explainer From the 1940s to Keir Starmer, the party leadership has zigzagged in and out of love with the bomb
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
What does victory now look like for Ukraine?
Today's Big Question Not losing is as important as winning as the tide turns in Russia's favour again
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published