Fact Check: The truth behind Nato military spending
Donald Trump says European members of the military alliance aren't paying their fair share – but is he right?
European members of Nato have long been accused of shirking their financial commitment to the military alliance, but what are the facts?
Who says what?
The latest debate on military spending comes ahead of the first face-to-face meeting between US President Donald Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Washington next week.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
According to Ukip MEP Nigel Farage, frank discussions on defence spending will feature high on the agenda.
"Germany and, in fact, most of the EU members of Nato are not paying their way," he told Fox Business. "I think they are going to have some very harsh talks."
The Trump administration has repeatedly admonished its allies in Europe for failing to reach Nato spending targets, with Defence Secretary James Mattis last month warning member states to increase their defence budgets or risk seeing the US "moderate its commitment" to the alliance.
What are the facts?
The US spends more on its military than the rest of Nato combined, making up more than $664bn (£544bn) of a total expenditure of $918bn (£752bn) in 2016. The UK comes in second, followed by France, Germany and Italy.
US expenditure "effectively represents 73 per cent of the defence spending of the alliance as a whole", says Nato.
"This does not mean that the US covers 73 per cent of the costs involved in the operational running of Nato, but it does mean that there is an over-reliance by the alliance as a whole on the US for the provision of essential [military] capabilities."
Nato states have committed to spending two per cent of their GDP on defence by 2024, but only the US, Greece, Poland, Estonia and the UK have so far reached that target, according to the latest figures from the organisation.
However, there is disagreement over the exact amount spent by the UK last year, with one think-tank claiming the figure was actually 1.6 per cent, well below the threshold. The Ministry of Defence rejected the calculation, suggesting it may have been affected by exchange rate fluctuations.
Although European nations lag behind the US, which spends 3.3 per cent of its GDP on defence, military budgets are rising sharply across parts of the continent. Baltic states such as Latvia and Lithuania, alarmed by Russian military aggression, increased their defence budgets by 42 and 34 per cent respectively last year, according to CNN Money.
Germany, Europe's largest economy, also announced a significant boost in military spending this year; however, its contribution still falls far short of the target, remaining at a little more than one per cent of its GDP.
Who is right?
Farage and Trump are correct that the US shoulders the largest burden when it comes to relative military spending by Nato members. However, military budgets are growing across parts of the continent and member states have until 2024 to meet their spending obligations to the alliance. While they are still working to this timeframe, it is premature of the Trump administration to threaten action.
Infographic by www.statista.com for TheWeek.co.uk.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Argos in Cappadocia: a magical hotel befitting its fairytale location
The Week Recommends Each of the unique rooms are carved out of the ancient caves
By Yasemen Kaner-White Published
-
Is Elon Musk about to disrupt British politics?
Today's big question Mar-a-Lago talks between billionaire and Nigel Farage prompt calls for change on how political parties are funded
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
The complaint that could change reality TV for ever
In the Spotlight A labour complaint filed against Love Is Blind has the potential to bolster the rights of reality stars across the US
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Why Assad fell so fast
The Explainer The newly liberated Syria is in an incredibly precarious position, but it's too soon to succumb to defeatist gloom
By The Week UK Published
-
Romania's election rerun
The Explainer Shock result of presidential election has been annulled following allegations of Russian interference
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russia's shadow war in Europe
Talking Point Steering clear of open conflict, Moscow is slowly ratcheting up the pressure on Nato rivals to see what it can get away with.
By The Week UK Published
-
Cutting cables: the war being waged under the sea
In the Spotlight Two undersea cables were cut in the Baltic sea, sparking concern for the global network
By The Week UK Published
-
The nuclear threat: is Vladimir Putin bluffing?
Talking Point Kremlin's newest ballistic missile has some worried for Nato nations
By The Week UK Published
-
Russia vows retaliation for Ukrainian missile strikes
Speed Read Ukraine's forces have been using U.S.-supplied, long-range ATCMS missiles to hit Russia
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Cuba's energy crisis
The Explainer Already beset by a host of issues, the island nation is struggling with nationwide blackouts
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published