Who is mystery businessman at heart of Telegraph’s #MeToo expose?
Court of Appeal stops newspaper publishing findings of eight-month investigation into harassment claims

A leading British businessman has won a legal battle in the Court of Appeal to prevent The Daily Telegraph naming him as part of an investigation into harassment.
The newspaper spent eight months investigating allegations of racial abuse, intimidation and sexual harassment made against the businessman by five of his staff members.
All five had been silenced with “settlement agreements” under which they received “substantial payments”, otherwise known as non-disclosure agreements, or NDAs.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Telegraph draws parallels with Harvey Weinstein’s use of NDAs to pay off accusers, and says that publishing the allegations against the British businessman would “be sure to reignite the #MeToo movement against the mistreatment of women, minorities and others by powerful employers”.
But after the paper contacted the accused boss for comment in July, he and a number of his senior staff applied for an injunction to stop the details being published - a request granted by three Court of Appeal judges on Tuesday.
The decision comes after a High Court judge refused to grant the gagging order in August. The Court of Appeal disagreed with the prior verdict, arguing that the staff making the allegations had been “compromised” by the settlement deals.
However, lawyers have pointed out that the latest court ruling says the injunction is an “interim injunction” that preserves “confidentiality pending a full trial”. In essence, this means the “legal process is not over”, tweets the author and lawyer known as The Secret Barrister.
The issue is further complicated by the fact that “two of the staff who made the accusations against the businessman supported the injunction”, says the BBC’s Clive Coleman.
“This may seem odd but it’s not unusual, as some people, even victims, don’t want a problem at work to follow them afterwards,” he adds.
Telegraph editor Chris Evans has argued that the public “have a right to know when the powerful seek to gag the vulnerable”.
According to Buzzfeed News’ Mark Di Stefano, Evans emailed staff at the paper last night vowing to fight the court order, saying: “We think it is overwhelmingly in the public interest that this story of ours be told and we are confident that, eventually, we will overturn the injunction.”
The ruling renders it illegal to disclose the businessman’s identity or that of his businesses, how much he paid his accusers, and the nature of the allegations.
But, his identity could be revealed in Parliament thanks to parliamentary privilege, which grants MPs certain legal immunities from being sued over what they say in the House.
Labour MP Jess Phillips hinted at this possibility in a tweet last night.
Although Phillips did not name the individual during Prime Minister’s Questions yesterday, she did ask Theresa May whether she thought the injunction was a problem.
The prime minister replied that while she could not discuss the specific case, she agreed that “there is a wider problem with the use of non-disclosure agreements to keep people quiet”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Team Trump brings the MAGA playbook to Albania's elections
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The architects of the president's 2024 victory are looking east to extend their populist reach
-
Narco subs are helping fuel a global cocaine surge
The Explainer Drug smugglers are increasingly relying on underwater travel to hide from law enforcement
-
Fed leaves rates unchanged as Powell warns on tariffs
speed read The Federal Reserve says the risks of higher inflation and unemployment are increasing under Trump's tariffs
-
What will be Warren Buffett's legacy?
Talking Points Observers call him 'the greatest investor of all time.'
-
A newly created gasoline giant in the Americas could change the industry landscape
The Explainer Sunoco and Parkland are two of the biggest fuel suppliers in the US and Canada, respectively
-
Warren Buffet announces surprise retirement
speed read At the annual meeting of Berkshire Hathaway, the billionaire investor named Vice Chairman Greg Abel his replacement
-
How will Wall Street react to the Trump-Powell showdown?
Today's Big Question 'Market turmoil' seems likely
-
What is the job market's future after Trump's tariffs?
Talking Points Economic analysts are split on what the tariffs could mean for employees
-
Discount stores were thriving. How did they stumble?
The Explainer Blame Walmart — and inflation
-
Safe harbor: Gold rises as stocks sink
feature It's a golden age for goldbugs
-
The battle over Jamaican rum
Under The Radar The spirit that defines the Caribbean is at the middle of a legal fight