US Supreme Court allows Trump transgender military ban
Justices vote 5-4 on allowing White House to overturn Obama-era policy
The US Supreme Court has allowed Donald Trump to enforce a ban on transgender people from serving in the military.
The court voted 5-4 on the policy to lift injunctions blocking the policy, however the law itself is still being fought out in lower courts.
The Supreme Court “could just have easily maintained the status quo - which allows transgender people to serve - while the case wended its way up the chain”, CNN says.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The policy prohibits “transgender persons who require or have undergone gender transition from serving”, the BBC says.
The Trump administration had been seeking to overturn an Obama-era rule that would have allowed transgender men and women to serve in the military, on the basis of the medical costs associated with transitioning from one gender to another.
The Washington Post reports that it was the five “conservative” justices – Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito Jr., Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh – that voted in favour of allowing the ban to be implemented.
The ruling still allows about 900 transgender individuals already serving openly to remain in the military, and will allow for other who are willing to serve in accordance with their birth gender.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
US Department of Justice spokeswoman Kerri Kupec praised the decision by the Supreme Court, saying: “Due to lower courts issuing nationwide injunctions, our military had been forced to maintain a prior policy that poses a risk to military effectiveness and lethality for over a year.”
-
Pushing for peace: is Trump appeasing Moscow?In Depth European leaders succeeded in bringing themselves in from the cold and softening Moscow’s terms, but Kyiv still faces an unenviable choice
-
Femicide: Italy’s newest crimeThe Explainer Landmark law to criminalise murder of a woman as an ‘act of hatred’ or ‘subjugation’ but critics say Italy is still deeply patriarchal
-
Brazil’s Bolsonaro behind bars after appeals run outSpeed Read He will serve 27 years in prison
-
South Africa wraps up G20 summit boycotted by USSpeed Read Trump has been sparring with South Africa in recent months
-
Trump pushes new Ukraine peace planSpeed Read It involves a 28-point plan to end the war
-
Americans traveling abroad face renewed criticism in the Trump eraThe Explainer Some of Trump’s behavior has Americans being questioned
-
Nigeria confused by Trump invasion threatSpeed Read Trump has claimed the country is persecuting Christians
-
Ukraine: Donald Trump pivots againIn the Spotlight US president apparently warned Volodymyr Zelenskyy to accept Vladimir Putin’s terms or face destruction during fractious face-to-face

