US Supreme Court allows Trump transgender military ban
Justices vote 5-4 on allowing White House to overturn Obama-era policy
The US Supreme Court has allowed Donald Trump to enforce a ban on transgender people from serving in the military.
The court voted 5-4 on the policy to lift injunctions blocking the policy, however the law itself is still being fought out in lower courts.
The Supreme Court “could just have easily maintained the status quo - which allows transgender people to serve - while the case wended its way up the chain”, CNN says.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The policy prohibits “transgender persons who require or have undergone gender transition from serving”, the BBC says.
The Trump administration had been seeking to overturn an Obama-era rule that would have allowed transgender men and women to serve in the military, on the basis of the medical costs associated with transitioning from one gender to another.
The Washington Post reports that it was the five “conservative” justices – Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito Jr., Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh – that voted in favour of allowing the ban to be implemented.
The ruling still allows about 900 transgender individuals already serving openly to remain in the military, and will allow for other who are willing to serve in accordance with their birth gender.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
US Department of Justice spokeswoman Kerri Kupec praised the decision by the Supreme Court, saying: “Due to lower courts issuing nationwide injunctions, our military had been forced to maintain a prior policy that poses a risk to military effectiveness and lethality for over a year.”
-
Metal-based compounds may be the future of antibioticsUnder the radar Robots can help develop them
-
Europe’s apples are peppered with toxic pesticidesUnder the Radar Campaign groups say existing EU regulations don’t account for risk of ‘cocktail effect’
-
Political cartoons for February 1Cartoons Sunday's political cartoons include Tom Homan's offer, the Fox News filter, and more
-
Israel retrieves final hostage’s body from GazaSpeed Read The 24-year-old police officer was killed during the initial Hamas attack
-
China’s Xi targets top general in growing purgeSpeed Read Zhang Youxia is being investigated over ‘grave violations’ of the law
-
Ukraine, US and Russia: do rare trilateral talks mean peace is possible?Rush to meet signals potential agreement but scepticism of Russian motives remain
-
Panama and Canada are negotiating over a crucial copper mineIn the Spotlight Panama is set to make a final decision on the mine this summer
-
Trump backs off Greenland threats, declares ‘deal’Speed Read Trump and NATO have ‘formed the framework for a future deal,’ the president claimed
-
Iran in flames: will the regime be toppled?In Depth The moral case for removing the ayatollahs is clear, but what a post-regime Iran would look like is anything but
-
Europe moves troops to Greenland as Trump fixatesSpeed Read Foreign ministers of Greenland and Denmark met at the White House yesterday
-
Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mineThe Explainer The country’s natural landscape makes the task extremely difficult