US Supreme Court allows Trump transgender military ban
Justices vote 5-4 on allowing White House to overturn Obama-era policy
The US Supreme Court has allowed Donald Trump to enforce a ban on transgender people from serving in the military.
The court voted 5-4 on the policy to lift injunctions blocking the policy, however the law itself is still being fought out in lower courts.
The Supreme Court “could just have easily maintained the status quo - which allows transgender people to serve - while the case wended its way up the chain”, CNN says.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The policy prohibits “transgender persons who require or have undergone gender transition from serving”, the BBC says.
The Trump administration had been seeking to overturn an Obama-era rule that would have allowed transgender men and women to serve in the military, on the basis of the medical costs associated with transitioning from one gender to another.
The Washington Post reports that it was the five “conservative” justices – Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito Jr., Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh – that voted in favour of allowing the ban to be implemented.
The ruling still allows about 900 transgender individuals already serving openly to remain in the military, and will allow for other who are willing to serve in accordance with their birth gender.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
US Department of Justice spokeswoman Kerri Kupec praised the decision by the Supreme Court, saying: “Due to lower courts issuing nationwide injunctions, our military had been forced to maintain a prior policy that poses a risk to military effectiveness and lethality for over a year.”
-
‘The point here is not to be anti-tech, but to rebalance a dynamic’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Political cartoons for December 22Cartoons Monday's political cartoons include energy bills, redacted files, and renaming the Washington monument
-
Guess the Number: December 2025Puzzles The daily number puzzle from The Week
-
Hong Kong court convicts democracy advocate LaiSpeed Read Former Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai was convicted in a landmark national security trial
-
How Bulgaria’s government fell amid mass protestsThe Explainer The country’s prime minister resigned as part of the fallout
-
Pakistan: Trump’s ‘favourite field marshal’ takes chargeIn the Spotlight Asim Munir’s control over all three branches of Pakistan’s military gives him ‘sweeping powers’ – and almost unlimited freedom to use them
-
Is Europe finally taking the war to Russia?Today's Big Question As Moscow’s drone buzzes and cyberattacks increase, European leaders are taking a more openly aggressive stance
-
Pushing for peace: is Trump appeasing Moscow?In Depth European leaders succeeded in bringing themselves in from the cold and softening Moscow’s terms, but Kyiv still faces an unenviable choice
-
Femicide: Italy’s newest crimeThe Explainer Landmark law to criminalise murder of a woman as an ‘act of hatred’ or ‘subjugation’ but critics say Italy is still deeply patriarchal
-
Brazil’s Bolsonaro behind bars after appeals run outSpeed Read He will serve 27 years in prison
-
South Africa wraps up G20 summit boycotted by USSpeed Read Trump has been sparring with South Africa in recent months