Will US-Taliban peace ‘framework’ lead to lasting deal?
US envoy announces breakthrough that could finally end Afghan war after 17 years – but major obstacles still remain

US officials and the Taliban have agreed in principle a framework for a peace deal that could finally bring an end to the 17-year war in Afghanistan.
Following six days of talks in Qatar, America’s chief negotiator Zalmay Khalilzad told the New York Times the deal would see insurgents guarantee to prevent Afghan territory from being used by terrorists, which in turn could lead to a full pullout of American troops in return for larger concessions from the Taliban.
The Guardian reports that Afghan insurgents have “signalled their commitment to talks by naming one of their most senior commanders [Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar] as chief negotiator”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“After nine years of halting efforts to reach a peace deal with the Taliban, the draft framework, though preliminary, is the biggest tangible step toward ending a two-decade war that has cost tens of thousands of lives and profoundly changed American foreign policy,” says the New York Times.
The US currently has around 14,000 troops in the country, the majority of whom are part of a larger NATO-led mission to train, advise and assist Afghan forces.
The 17-year conflict is the longest war in American history, has cost the lives of more than 2,400 US soldiers, cost billions of dollars and spanned three presidents. The number of Afghan soldiers and civilians killed or injured is estimated be in the hundreds of thousands.
Despite this, the Taliban’s power and reach have surged since foreign troops pulled out in 2014.
They have been staging near-daily attacks targeting Afghan forces, causing scores of casualties every week and securing large swathes of the country. It is estimated that around 15 million people, half the Afghan population, are now living in areas either controlled by the Taliban or where the militants are openly present and regularly mount attacks.
“That has made peace an even more pressing issue,” says TIME.
The BBC's South Asia editor Jill McGivering says the discussions “clearly remain at a provisional stage - and a long way from agreement on the broader issues required for lasting peace in Afghanistan - but after years of stalemate, it's welcome progress”.
But in a sign of the obstacles ahead, an Afghan source close to the negotiations told CNN “the Taliban will not agree to a ceasefire without the US committing to a full troop withdrawal, but the Americans want any withdrawal to be conditional on the ceasefire holding”.
“The Taliban are sceptical that the US will actually pull out if the ceasefire holds,” says the news network.
Any US troop withdrawal would also be contingent on the Taliban talking directly with the Afghan government, something its leaders have repeatedly ruled out, dismissing those in power in Kabul as “puppets”.
According to The Guardian “there is a growing desperation for peace among ordinary Afghans” but the country's president, Ashraf Ghani, has moved to assure his people that no deals would be made without Kabul’s awareness and full participation in negotiations, and that their rights will not be compromised in the name of peace with the Taliban.
In a bid to break any potential deadlock, the New York Times reports that Khalilzad has “suggested the idea of 'freezing' the agreement on the two central issues and waiting for Taliban to deliver on the conditions laid out for finalising it. But he also suggested that might test President Trump’s already waning patience.”
Trump is keen to draw down US troop numbers in Afghanistan.
In December, The Wall Street Journal reported that the US military had been ordered to begin planning to withdraw about half the troops in the country.
According the paper the decision was made at the same time as Trump decided to pull out all US troops from Syria – a move that was widely criticised from within the administration and led to the resignation of Defense Secretary James Mattis.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Today's political cartoons - March 30, 2025
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - strawberry fields forever, secret files, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 hilariously sparse cartoons about further DOGE cuts
Cartoons Artists take on free audits, report cards, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Following the Tea Horse Road in China
The Week Recommends This network of roads and trails served as vital trading routes
By The Week UK Published
-
Is it safe to share state secrets with the US?
Today's Big Question Accidental top-level leak stokes security concerns from America's allies
By The Week UK Published
-
Israeli air strikes in Gaza: why has ceasefire collapsed?
Today's Big Question Start of 'broader and more sustained military operation' denounced by domestic groups representing hostage families
By The Week UK Published
-
Can Ukraine make peace with Trump in Saudi Arabia?
Talking Point Zelenskyy and his team must somehow navigate the gap between US president's 'demands and threats'
By The Week UK Published
-
Ukraine: where do Trump's loyalties really lie?
Today's Big Question 'Extraordinary pivot' by US president – driven by personal, ideological and strategic factors – has 'upended decades of hawkish foreign policy toward Russia'
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
What will Trump-Putin Ukraine peace deal look like?
Today's Big Question US president 'blindsides' European and UK leaders, indicating Ukraine must concede seized territory and forget about Nato membership
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Donald Trump behind potential Gaza ceasefire and will it work?
Today's Big Question Israel and Hamas are 'on the brink' of a peace deal and a hostage exchange, for which the incoming president may take credit
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Experts call for a Nato bank to 'Trump-proof' military spending
Under The Radar A new lender could aid co-operation and save millions of pounds, say think tanks
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
The Taliban’s ‘unprecedented’ crackdown on opium poppy crops in Afghanistan
feature Cultivation in former poppy-growing heartland Helmand has been slashed from 120,000 hectares to less than 1,000
By Julia O'Driscoll Published