Could Congress be impeached for failing to raise the debt limit?
How the Tea Party could be burned by the Constitution
With the United States expected to hit its borrowing limit in seven days, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) will present a proposal to raise the debt ceiling for six weeks to avoid defaulting on America's debts.
There is no guarantee that House Republicans or President Obama will agree to it. And even if they do, we could end up in the same spot next month, and the month after that. That has some wondering whether or not we can just impeach an unbelievably unpopular Congress and start over with a clean slate.
The impeachable offense in this case would be violating the Fourteenth Amendment, which states, "The validity of the public debt of the United States...shall not be questioned."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
It was written during another bitterly divided time in American politics, the post-Civil War era, and was meant to reassure foreign creditors that the United States was still a safe place to invest their money.
Some have argued that Obama could unilaterally raise the debt ceiling under the aegis of the amendment, but the White House has taken that option off the table.
However, there is another option. "Some opine, probably correctly, that the House will impeach Obama if he moves unilaterally on the debt ceiling after the House declines to act," writes Kristin Roberts at National Journal, but "Congress, too, is bound by that amendment."
Garrett Epps, writing at The Atlantic, argues that default would be "the rough equivalent of a sudden attack on the United States." That justifies Obama acting unilaterally, he writes:
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
No one would question that a commander-in-chief could respond to such an attack — even if Congress refused to act in the face of the threat. In that situation, the members of Congress, not the president, would be in violation of their oaths. [The Atlantic]
That prompts the question: Could Congress be impeached for violating the Constitution?
The answer is yes — but only by Congress itself. The Constitution allows for the "president, vice president and all civil officers" of the United States to be impeached, which includes members of Congress.
In this case, it's extremely unlikely that members of Congress would vote to impeach each other — especially since the process begins in the House Judiciary Committee, which includes several Tea Party Republicans like Reps. Steve King (Iowa) and Jason Chaffetz (Utah).
Even if the committee decided that there was enough evidence to go down that path, the same Republican-led House that has engaged Obama in a two-week game of chicken would have to vote to pursue a full-blown impeachment hearing.
Sorry, enraged Americans calling to #ImpeachCongress on Twitter, there is no way that is ever going to happen. Looking to Australia won't help either. In 1975, the country's governor general, Sir John Kerr, dismissed the entire parliament after a budget deadlock. That was only possible, however, because Australia technically recognizes the authority of the British monarchy.
Ultimately, there isn't really a way to fire Congress, except for the time-honored tradition of angrily voting the bums out of office.
Keith Wagstaff is a staff writer at TheWeek.com covering politics and current events. He has previously written for such publications as TIME, Details, VICE, and the Village Voice.
-
Starbucks workers are planning their ‘biggest strike’ everThe Explainer The union said 92% of its members voted to strike
-
‘These wouldn’t be playgrounds for billionaires’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The 5 best nuclear war movies of all timeThe Week Recommends ‘A House of Dynamite’ reanimates a dormant cinematic genre for our new age of atomic insecurity
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are US billionaires backing?The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration