Opinion

Why Playboy's pornography failed

It's not just about the ubiquity of pornography. It's also a matter of taste.

The Earth-shattering news that Playboy will stop putting nudie pics in its magazine prompted this rather arch observation from the writer Helen Andrews.

And certainly, Playboy's decision can't be separated from the strange, stubborn cultural fact of the unprecedented availability of hardcore porn, which drove Playboy from shocking to shockingly tame. The ubiquity of pornography is also a cultural fact with as-yet unknowable and probably deeply profound consequences.

So given the hardcore, abundant, on-demand offerings of sites like YouPorn, it's no surprise that relatively few contemporary young men are turning to Playboy for arousal. And that — not the articles — was what Playboy was about.

Consider what my colleague James Poulos has dubbed the "pink police state," or the political-cultural regime that prevails when we as a society value interpersonal freedoms more than political freedoms. The pink police state, Poulos writes, polices the boundary between "clean/dirty" and "safe/dangerous," a boundary that Playboy unwittingly straddled with its mix of smut and faux-intellectual articles. We live in a world of hardcore porn (dirty) and airbrushed Victoria's Secret models who keep their underwear on (clean), and in between those two there's no room for airbrushed naked models in tame poses.

But there's another angle to this, too, one that's both more mundane and more important: simple taste.

Just look at Hugh Hefner's interchangeable girlfriends, all based on the same pneumatic Barbie mold, with the gravity-defying, perfectly spherical breasts. I confess that I could stare at many of the Playboy centerfolds from the 1960s or 1970s for hours, and not for entirely concupiscent reasons. But starting at some point in the 1980s, they all became the same. My eyes just glaze over. If you're going to give me smut, give me good smut! Smut that is, at least, aesthetically interesting. Most "artistic erotica," or whatever you want to call it, fails because it just ends up being some pornographer's idea of what fancy-pants art is supposed to look like. And it all looks the same.

It's also true about the articles, by the way. At the end of the day, Playboy really was just about the smut, and the articles were really just about the idea of having smart articles there than about the actual articles. Playboy followed Esquire and GQ down the same "lad mag" slope of some celebrity profile written in faux New Journalism style and lots of shopping lists and called it a day.

I really can imagine myself reading a magazine that has some beautiful erotic photos and some interesting, well-written articles. It just happens not to exist, simply because Hugh Hefner, or whoever runs Playboy day to day, has poor taste.

Or a poor view of his audience. Which, for a pornographer, shouldn't be surprising.

More From...

Picture of Pascal-Emmanuel GobryPascal-Emmanuel Gobry
Read All
Liberals' Medicaid hypocrisy
The Democratic caucus.
Opinion

Liberals' Medicaid hypocrisy

The quiet intellectual push behind conservatives' court coup
If a conservative justice joins the Supreme Court, Antonin Scalia would be proud.
Opinion

The quiet intellectual push behind conservatives' court coup

What the Bible really says about government
A Bible and the Capitol Building.
Analysis

What the Bible really says about government

Vladimir Putin's own goal
Vladimir Putin.
Opinion

Vladimir Putin's own goal

Recommended

Is there any hope to stop gun violence?
guns and american flag
Talking point

Is there any hope to stop gun violence?

TV to watch in April
Elizabeth Olsen in Love & Death
Feature

TV to watch in April

The daily gossip: March 31, 2023
Gwyneth Paltrow
Daily gossip

The daily gossip: March 31, 2023

Millions of Americans poised to lose Medicaid coverage on April 1
Doctor holding clipboard.
healthcare at risk

Millions of Americans poised to lose Medicaid coverage on April 1

Most Popular

Millions of Americans poised to lose Medicaid coverage on April 1
Doctor holding clipboard.
healthcare at risk

Millions of Americans poised to lose Medicaid coverage on April 1

Jennifer Aniston: Friends is now 'offensive' to a 'whole generation'
Jennifer Aniston
the one where they get canceled

Jennifer Aniston: Friends is now 'offensive' to a 'whole generation'

The 8 most bizarre moments of Gwyneth Paltrow's ski crash trial
Gwyneth Paltrow
downhill

The 8 most bizarre moments of Gwyneth Paltrow's ski crash trial