Why Trump fever is boosting interest rates
Finance is growing hungrier for risk. Here's why.


A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
Throughout November, interest rates have been rising around the world. This means that U.S. debt has grown slightly more expensive. Why? One word: Trump.
No one knows what the Trump administration is actually going to do, but the financial markets have clearly decided that they do. They've concluded that he's going to massively cut taxes and increase spending. Indeed he has promised both big tax cuts and a big infrastructure spending plan, although he has promised a lot of other things too. This would deliver a real boost to the economy. But it remains to be seen whether that's what Trump intends to do, or whether he can get it done. On the other hand, the markets seem to have discounted Trump's talk of trade wars, which would hammer the economy, let alone the prospect that through a mix of incompetence and aggressiveness he could spark a massive global conflagration.
They have clearly decided that he's going to cut taxes, boost spending, maybe deregulate, and not do anything economically destructive. That means they anticipate rising interest rates.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
How does that work? And what do interest rates mean, anyway?
In financial markets, the rate of return generally correlates with risk. This means that riskier assets return more money in exchange for greater risk, and less risky assets return less (but they're safer). And when the economy is bad, investors on the whole become risk averse. It makes sense: When the economy is bad, riskier projects become even more likely to fail, and so investors get cold feet.
This means that interest rates across the economy go down. Investors want to hold fewer risky assets like stocks, and more safe assets like government bonds. Because there's more demand for government bonds, the government can sell bonds at a lower interest rate. In other words, people are so desperate for safe assets that they're willing to get a lower rate of return in exchange for the safety of government bonds.
Now that the markets are predicting — again, rightly or wrongly — that Trump will be good for the economy, that process is reversing. Stocks are up, which means investors want more risky assets, and so interest rates on government bonds have gone up. Once the interest rate on the safest asset class — government bonds — goes up, the interest rates on other asset classes go up as well. Nobody would buy a corporate bond that returns the same as a government bond, but is less safe. So the rates on corporate bonds increase.
Now, some people are already saying that "the era of low interest rates" that began with the financial crisis in 2008 is over. Let's not kid ourselves. On a historical basis, interest rates are still very low.
The macroeconomic fundamentals of the world's major economies have remained the same. The West's advanced economies still suffer from depressed demographics, stagnant productivity, depressed demand, and conservative central banks. All of these things point to sluggish economic growth, and that means that rates are still likely to stay historically low.
Right now, marginally higher rates mean marginally more expensive mortgages and consumer loans, and that's not great for the economy. For interest rates to truly go up, there would have to be a major boost to productivity or another driver of economic activity, which would be good news indeed. But we're not there yet.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry is a writer and fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. His writing has appeared at Forbes, The Atlantic, First Things, Commentary Magazine, The Daily Beast, The Federalist, Quartz, and other places. He lives in Paris with his beloved wife and daughter.
-
Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 23 September 2023
The Week’s daily digest of the news agenda, published at 8am
By The Week Staff Published
-
Pinochet’s coup in Chile 50 years on
The Explainer Half a century on, the former leader still sharply divides opinion in his home country
By The Week Staff Published
-
The Week Unwrapped: Ghost tankers, loyalty cards and contempt
Podcast Should we be worried about illicit oil tankers? What are the limits to protests outside court? And are supermarket loyalty schemes all they seem?
By The Week Staff Published
-
Are Western sanctions working on Russia’s growing economy?
Today's Big Question IMF forecasts Russian growth but one expert says the West must be patient in bid to deter Putin
By Arion McNicoll Published
-
South Africa’s energy crisis explained
feature Electricity blackouts lead to rising crime and economic hardship and add to pressure on ANC
By The Week Staff Published
-
India’s geopolitical aspirations in 2023
feature The emerging Asian superpower is showing ‘growing confidence’ on the world stage
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Death of a superpower: is China facing a decade of decline?
Today's Big Question For the first time in 60 years, China’s population has fallen – leading to concerns about its superpower status
By Arion McNicoll Published
-
The pros and cons of noncompete agreements
The Explainer The FTC wants to ban companies from binding their employees with noncompete agreements. Who would this benefit, and who would it hurt?
By Peter Weber Published
-
The economic consequences of China’s protests
In Depth The push for greater freedoms could upend the established world order
By The Week Staff Published
-
Opec+: what oil production cut means for the West
feature Dramatic drop in output helps Russia but could spell further price rises for consumers
By Fred Kelly Published
-
Would Credit Suisse collapse mean a repeat of 2008?
Talking Point CEO of troubled Swiss bank attempts to soothe nerves but default risk remains
By The Week Staff Published