There is no way in hell Trump should meet with Kim Jong Un
The case against inviting the devil to the White House


A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
If you wanted to find hell on Earth, you could not do much better than North Korea. So if President Donald Trump has any ideas about negotiating one-on-one with the leader of the so-called hermit kingdom, he should know this: He might as well be dealing with Lucifer himself.
When you step back and consider the amount of human suffering the Kim regime has subjected its own people to — all to control the population and ensure the survival of a government that has no business existing in the first place — you have to wonder how such a regime can survive under the weight of its own sins.
Just how nasty is the North Korean government? Some shameful facts and statistics President Trump should consider before he has tea and crumpets with Kim Jong Un:
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
- Today, according to most experts, somewhere between 120,000 to 200,000 people or more are locked away in prison camps — more like concentration camps, according to many defectors that have lived to talk about them. The abuses in such camps — like forced viewing of the most vile methods of torture or executions, forced abortions, and brutal starvation — seem stolen from the pages of Nazi Germany.
- According to one highly cited estimate, 25 percent who enter a prison camp die of disease.
- Many experts claim that at least 200,000 people or more have died in such camps over the last six decades. Some go further, such as Georgetown Professor Victor Cha in his must-read book on North Korea The Impossible State, which claims that as many as one million people have died in North Korean gulags.
- As Pyongyang pursued atomic weapons in the 1990s, as many as 2.5 million people died of starvation, thanks to a terrible famine.
- While the worst of the famine has largely passed, 10 million people are still undernourished with as many as 18 million dependent on food rations. But Kim Jong Un presses ahead building his military machine. North Korea fields the world's fourth largest army with over 4,300 tanks, 200,000 special forces troops, and thousands of tons of chemical weapons that could kill countless people.
So while President Trump might consider it "an honor" to meet the leader who should instead be meeting with prosecutors at The Hague, he needs to know the facts as they are.
Now, does that mean the Trump administration should not meet with North Korean officials at all and rule out all talks whatsoever? As much as it pains me to say it, no.
Again, the facts matter. Pyongyang is racing towards developing a world-class nuclear arsenal and already has the ability to kill millions of people in South Korea, Japan, or unleash atomic terror against U.S. bases in the Asia-Pacific region. And Kim seems certain in the next few years to gain the ultimate weapon, a missile that can hold at bay the U.S. homeland with a nuclear warhead. It is, indeed, the most frightening of prospects.
Then why even bother talking to Pyongyang, considering its horrendous human rights record and growing ability to spread misery around the world?
While it seems highly unlikely that even the most skilled diplomat could convince North Korea to give up its nuclear or missile programs, having some sort of open dialogue with Pyongyang could be beneficial even if there are no immediate deliverables. Think about it: What if someday we are at the razor's edge of a crisis and war seems near imminent — thanks to an errant North Korean missile or an incident along the demilitarized zone starts to spiral out of control. At least Washington and Seoul will have someone in Pyongyang to call in an effort to avoid a Second Korean War. That alone would be big progress.
But if America should be willing to sit down with the representatives of "hell," why not just sit down with Kim himself, cut out the middlemen and negotiate directly?
The simple fact is that in one handshake, in one photo that would go viral around the world, President Trump would be legitimizing one of the world's most evil human beings and governments of all time, indeed, what one North Korean refugee described to me once as his people's "own personal Hitler." While certainly not intentional, the Trump administration would be sending a signal that things like prison camps, torture, the use of chemical weapons against your own citizens, and centuries of human rights norms could be just cast aside in order to "cut a deal."
Take this all a step further. Imagine President Trump and Dictator Kim walking side by side in the halls of the White House or along the boulevards of North Korea's capital. That should turn your stomach. There could be nothing viler than the leader of the free world making small talk with the pariah of Pyongyang. And that is why it should never happen.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Harry J. Kazianis is director of defense studies at the Center for the National Interest, founded by former U.S. President Richard M. Nixon.
-
10 things you need to know today: September 22, 2023
Daily Briefing Zelenskyy visits Washington as Biden unveils more Ukraine aid, Rupert Murdoch steps down at Fox and News Corp., and more
By Harold Maass Published
-
Hunter Biden: a case of special treatment?
Why's everyone talking about If Hunter's surname weren't Biden, he probably wouldn't be facing these charges, say commentators
By The Week Staff Published
-
Is Ukraine losing the support of Eastern Europe?
Today's big question Grain dispute between Warsaw and Kyiv could lead to other dominos falling
By Chas Newkey-Burden Published
-
Azerbaijan attacks disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region, breaking cease-fire
The 'local anti-terrorist' strikes in the ethnic Armenian enclave threaten to reignite a war with implications for Russia, Turkey and the West
By Peter Weber Published
-
Canada's Trudeau accuses India of role in assassination of Canadian Sikh leader
Canada expelled a senior Indian diplomat after going public with explosive 'credible allegations' that Indian agents helped kill a Canadian citizen
By Peter Weber Published
-
US-Iran prisoner swap: has Biden given in to blackmail?
Republicans condemn $6bn deal but it could help de-escalate rising tensions
By The Week Staff Published
-
Russia and Ukraine face off in The Hague over genocide case
Kyiv is hoping court will rule Russia's actions illegal but Moscow wants the case dismissed
By Rebekah Evans Published
-
Indigenous Voice referendum: is this Australia's 'Brexit moment'?
The referendum on Indigenous rights may be a moment of reckoning for the 'open wounds of nationhood'
By Rebekah Evans Published
-
Is Biden's whirlwind Vietnam trip a warning to China?
Today's Big Question Emphasizing 'growth and stability,' the president keeps an eye on Hanoi's neighbor to the north
By Rafi Schwartz Published
-
Is Elon Musk too powerful?
Today's Big Question When one tech billionaire can stop an entire army on the other side of the globe, the risks might outweigh the rewards
By Rafi Schwartz Published
-
Is Biden losing Black voters?
Talking Point The prospect has Democrats nervous about 2024
By Joel Mathis Published