Trump's border wall broken promise
The president promised to make Mexico pay for his ridiculous wall. He failed. Now he's holding the government hostage.


It was one of the first promises Donald Trump made when he declared his candidacy for president, one he kept repeating as an applause line to raucous crowds throughout his campaign: He was going to build a wall along the Mexico border. And not only that: He promised Mexico would pay for it.
"I would build a great wall, and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me, and I'll build them very inexpensively," he said in 2015. "I will build a great great wall on our southern border and I'll have Mexico pay for that wall."
It was a bad promise back then. It's a broken promise now.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Two years into Trump's presidency, the wall still doesn't exist — though he keeps lying about that simple fact — and Mexico is understandably no closer to picking up the tab. So now, President Trump is looking to the American taxpayers to do the job that Mexico won't, asking Congress to pony up $5 billion so he can finally start building his precious border barrier.
If he doesn't get what he wants, Trump says he'll shut down the government when funding expires Dec. 21.
Let him.
Trump thinks he holds all the cards with voters on the immigration issue, and it's true that his base responds positively to calls for increased border security. But his attempt to pressure House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) into helping him secure the $5 billion is failing — liberal Democrats might go into open rebellion if they did so. Trump simply doesn't have the leverage he thinks he does.
Democratic leaders have two factors on their side: The first is that Trump is probably bluffing: We've seen him back away from similar threats before, and there's no reason to take him seriously this time. The second factor is that Dems can simply present the shutdown as a result of the president's inability to keep his most famous promise.
"The president promised you wouldn't pay for the wall," they can tell the country. "Now he's decided to bring government to a halt because he couldn't keep that promise. Is that fair?"
In truth, the border wall was always a bad idea — immoral, disruptive to landowners, a likely boon for drug cartels and, after all of that, still probably ineffective. Those reasons are good enough for Democrats to refuse to help the president on wall funding.
The suggestion that Mexico would pay for the wall was even worse: Nobody outside of Trump's circle has ever believed that country would keep Trump's promise for him.
But the idea was also extremely odd, if you think about it. When you build a fence on your own land, you don't make your neighbor pay for it — you probably wouldn't even think to ask. So why the appeal? As with most things in Trumpworld, a bully's logic makes the most sense here, the wrongheaded idea that Mexicans would pay for our wall because we are bigger and stronger and can make them bend to our will. For Trump, this was a show of strength and swagger, and it turned out to be hollow.
Trump should be on the ropes with this issue. Unfortunately, Democrats have given him a ray of hope.
Schumer and Pelosi, it turns out, have offered their party's congressional support to budget up to $1.3 billion for the border wall. That's roughly $1.3 billion more than most Democratic voters would prefer. Still, Trump says it's not enough — he wants the full $5 billion, or the government shuts down. But on Monday night, Pelosi signaled she's willing to go no further:
"Our country cannot afford a #TrumpShutdown, especially at this time of economic uncertainty," she tweeted. "This holiday season, @realDonaldTrump knows full well that his wall proposal does not have the votes to pass the House & Senate, and should not be an obstacle to a bipartisan agreement."
That's the right, hardline stance to take. The border wall sums up how Trump has approached the presidency in general: He had a bad idea, failed to execute it properly, and now threatens to throw a tantrum if he doesn't get his way. Democrats shouldn't enable Trump's broken promises — in this case, at least, they should stand back and let him fail.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Gaza is running out of cash
Under The Radar Palestinians pay the price as black market springs up around banknotes and coins
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Law firms: Caving to White House pressure
Feature Trump targets major law firms tied to his past investigations
By The Week US Published
-
Venezuelan deportees: Locked up for tattoos?
Feature A former pro soccer player was deported after U.S. authorities claimed his tattoo proved he belonged to a Venezuelan gang
By The Week US Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published