Research suggests there's an easy way to reduce suicide rates: increase the minimum wage
A new study adds to a growing body of research about the connection between economics and "deaths of despair"
Minimum wage hikes are a hot topic these days, particularly as a number of cities and states have ramped up their minimums to $15 an hour. Usually, the debate revolves around whether minimum wage hikes reduce employment, by making workers more expensive to hire. But now there's another twist we can add: It looks like higher minimum wages reduce suicide rates.
According to new research just published in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, every $1 increase in the per hour minimum wage cuts the suicide rate among people with a high school education or less by something between 3.5 percent and 5.9 percent. The researchers found no significant impact on suicide rates among more educated Americans.
The authors of the study used state minimum wages as a kind of natural experiment: some state minimums are quite higher than the federal minimum of $7.25. As the authors put it, if you imagine the minimum wage as a medical treatment aimed at addressing the public health problem of suicide, then the federal minimum wage is the baseline treatment, and the state minimum wage hikes are experiments in higher "doses." And it sure looks like higher doses correlate with fewer suicides among people with less education — a population that is both more impacted by minimum wage hikes and that's at a higher risk of suicide.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Put another way: the study's findings suggest that if every state's minimum wage had been $1 higher than they were over the 1990 to 2015 period the data covered, then 27,550 suicides could've been prevented. Had state minimum wages been $2 higher, there could've been 57,350 fewer suicides.
Now, no study is perfect, and opponents of minimum wage hikes have already quibbled with the methodology. (We'll get to those objections in a minute.) But the real lesson here is less about this specific study than the general trend of the research: This is the third study in just the last year to suggest that minimum wage hikes could cut suicides. Another paper, looking at state-by-state variation in policy from 1999 to 2015, found a 10 percent hike in minimum wages cut suicides not related to drugs by 3.6 percent among Americans with just a high school education or less. That paper also found no effect for more educated workers. Yet more research, looking at these state variations from 2006 to 2016, found a $1 increase in the minimum wage went along with a 1.9 percent reduction in the suicide rate — though that study didn't break things down by education.
After falling for decades, suicide rates in the U.S. started climbing again after 2000, and are now higher than they've been at any point since World War II. The change is part of a rise in so-called "deaths of despair" — i.e. deaths from suicide, drug overdoses and alcoholism. As a result of that rise, there's been an unprecedented decline in overall U.S. life expectancy in recent years. And at this point, plenty of research points to personal hardships related to work and finances as one major cause of suicide. There's well-grounded logic for thinking that raising the floor for what people are paid by their jobs should lead to better outcomes for human well-being — more hope, more stability, more healthy behaviors, and less fear and stress — and thus fewer suicides.
The Epidemiology & Community Health study specifically also added two interesting twists to the literature: They found that the effect of a higher minimum wage on suicides was actually stronger when unemployment is high. And they found the reduction in suicides was actually stronger immediately after the hike is passed than one year out from the passage.
On the first point, the authors theorize that wages are higher anyway when unemployment is low (because workers have more bargaining power in tight labor markets) so the protection for people's well-being offered by the minimum wage itself is less significant. But the second point is especially interesting, because it suggests the psychological effect on people of knowing the minimum wage is higher may count as much for their well-being as the raw material fact of getting more income. This could also circle back to the first point: When you don't have a job, maybe the stress and despair is lessened by knowing that, once you do find unemployment again, it will pay better.
Now, what about those aforementioned objections? The "dosage" methodology the study used is relatively unusual in minimum wage research. And critics of minimum wage increases pointed out it can lead to weird conceptual results: If the federal government increased its minimum to $14 an hour, for example, to match Washington, D.C.'s, then the "dosage" there — and the effect on suicides — would be the same as the current situation for Alabama, where $7.25 an hour is the state and federal minimum. Also, because the study specifies the dosage in dollars, that means a state-federal gap of, say, $7.25 to $8.25 would have the same effect as a $14 to $15 gap, even though those differences are quite different percentage-wise.
This all led Sen. Mike Lee's (R-Utah) office to quip: "By [the study's] logic, if we raised the federal minimum wage while keeping state minimum wages constant, suicide would go up!" Frankly, that's a rather tendentious read of a statistical method that, while not perfect, is certainly intuitive. No one is suggesting the gap itself is the causal mechanism here.
It's also worth noting that the aforementioned paper that found a 3.6 percent decrease in suicides from a 10 percent increase in the minimum wage used a much more common methodology that smooths out the conceptual issues with the "dosage" approach.
There are other more straightforward — and more modest — critiques. For instance, while the authors tried to control for confounding variables that might have influenced the results — like differences in state-level economic output, differing unemployment rates, and the benefits from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program — they weren't able to control for state-by-state variations in the food stamps program. Aparna Mathur, an economist at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, also argued that, because the study looked at aggregate trends at the state level, it's hard to tease out what the causal mechanism is for the reduction. She noted that disemployment effects from the minimum wage hikes could still leave people worse off, even if they aren't committing suicide as much.
John Kaufman, a doctoral student at Emory University and one of the study's lead authors, agreed that a look at state-level numbers rather than individuals "is not able to show why the wage hike appeared to reduce suicide rates."
But, speaking as an educated layman, I don't find this last critique by Mathur particularly persuasive.
At the end of the day, the objection to the minimum wage is the risk that it increases joblessness by making workers more costly for employers to hire. We can of course try to look at job effects directly, and the bulk of the research suggests that — at least where the minimum wage hikes we're attempting so far are concerned — the effects on employment are minimal. But ultimately, the reason to avoid increasing unemployment is that joblessness itself is decimating to people's mental well-being. Suicide is the most extreme outcome of the very despair and hopelessness that unemployment can cause. If minimum wage hikes do lead to more joblessness, then presumably they should increase suicides in the aggregate, especially for the less-educated Americans most exposed to the minimum wages' impacts.
Probably the most important thing to keep in mind here is the banal point that we could always use more research, such as adding controls for the food stamp program and other possibly-confounding variables. If the causal mechanism here is indeed that a higher minimum wage decreases the despair that can lead to suicide, then researchers should test that theory by looking into whether minimum wage hikes also decrease other trends, like rates of depression or of unsuccessful suicide attempts. "There's a lot of information that we would like to have to fill in the gaps," Kaufman himself admitted.
Thus far, though, the findings do indeed suggest that aggregate suicides fall as the minimum wage rises. And that's a devastating finding for minimum wage opponents' theory of the case.
Want more essential commentary and analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for The Week's "Today's best articles" newsletter here.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jeff Spross was the economics and business correspondent at TheWeek.com. He was previously a reporter at ThinkProgress.
-
US election: who the billionaires are backing
The Explainer More have endorsed Kamala Harris than Donald Trump, but among the 'ultra-rich' the split is more even
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
1 of 6 'Trump Train' drivers liable in Biden bus blockade
Speed Read Only one of the accused was found liable in the case concerning the deliberate slowing of a 2020 Biden campaign bus
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published