Brexit: Was High Court ruling on Article 50 bad for UK democracy?
Leave campaigners warn against 'subversion' after government is forced to put its plans before parliament
Yesterday's High Court's ruling that Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty cannot be triggered without MPs' approval has been celebrated as a victory for UK parliamentary sovereignty by some, while others warn the decision flies in the face of the referendum results.
The government said it intended to appeal the "disappointing" ruling, but maintains that its plan to start the Brexit process early next year will continue untrammelled.
Prime Minister Theresa May is today expected to tell Jean-Claude Juncker, the President of the European Commission, the UK is still on course to follow the planned timetable for a prospective exit from the EU in 2019.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The High Court's decision has divided the political right. While "senior Tories have welcomed the ruling as a boost to parliamentary sovereignty", The Guardian reports, some Leave campaigners fear it will be used to block Brexit.
Ukip interim leader Nigel Farage said the ruling indicates "betrayal may be near at hand" and warned MPs they had "no idea of the level of public anger they will provoke" if they attempted to subvert the referendum result.
"Yesterday's High Court judgment was badly mistaken," writes Richard Ekins in the Daily Telegraph, outlining the legal case in favour of the government. Even if the ruling was made in complete good faith, it serves to "empower parliamentarians who would like to thwart the referendum result", he says.
Much has been made in the Remain-leaning press of the irony that elements of the Leave campaign are now arguing against Westminster having the final say on decisions affecting the British people, something Brexiters extolled as one of the benefits of leaving the EU.
"Surely those who should be cheering today's high court judgment the loudest are the people who have been the most passionate defenders of parliamentary sovereignty," says Jonathan Freedland in The Guardian.
Under the UK system of parliamentary democracy, an MP is not supposed to merely relay the demands of their constituency but act in the nation's interest according to their own research and judgement.
This is why the High Court's decision provides Remainers with a "glimmer of hope", writes AC Grayling in the New Statesman: "If MPs vote according to their beliefs about what is best for the United Kingdom, the madness of Brexit will be stopped."
The government's intention to refuse a parliamentary vote never had a basis in a "high constitutional principal" in the first place, Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said yesterday.
"It's because they don't have a coherent position and they know that if they take their case to the House of Commons that will be exposed," she added.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'Making a police state out of the liberal university'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
8 looming climate tipping points that imperil our planet
The Explainer New reports detail the thresholds we may be close to crossing
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Try 6 free issues of The Week Junior
Spark your child's curiosity with The Week Junior - the award-winning current affairs magazine for 8-14s.
By The Week Published
-
'Presidential debates are more performance art than actual ways to inform'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
'Horror stories of women having to carry nonviable fetuses'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
'Elevating Earth Day into a national holiday is not radical — it's practical'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Is the Supreme Court about to criminalize homelessness?
Talking Points The court will decide if bans on outdoor camping are 'cruel and unusual'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
In what states is abortion legal, illegal, and in limbo?
In The Spotlight Where American states stand on abortion care
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
How could the Supreme Court's Fischer v. US case impact the other Jan 6. trials including Trump's?
Today's Big Question A former Pennsylvania cop might hold the key to a major upheaval in how the courts treat the Capitol riot — and its alleged instigator
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
'Europe is now beginning to tackle its military to-do list'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
'Young kids simply shouldn't be on social media'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published