Why Trump is really sending 5,200 troops to US border
US president accused of stoking immigration fears ahead of critical midterm elections
Donald Trump is sending more than 5,000 American troops to the Mexico border, in what government officials claim is a necessary response to thousands of asylum seekers heading to the US.
The forces, deployed as part of what is being called Operation Faithful Patriot, “will include military police, pilots, and engineers and will be in the area from 5 November to 15 December”, reports Vox.
The goal is to “harden [the US’s] ports of entry in California, Arizona and Texas”, according to Customs and Border Protection chief Kevin McAleenan.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The announcement of the move, just days before the midterm elections, “has intensified criticism that the president is using the military for political gain”, says The New York Times.
A caravan of around 4,000 Central American migrants – including entire families and the elderly – has been moving slowly north since mid-October and is now in southern Mexico. But the group is still “2,000 miles by road and weeks away from reaching a US port of entry, where most are expected to seek asylum as the law allows”, says The Guardian.
Trump’s decision to send more US troops will take the total number of military personnel on the southern frontier to some 7,000 - “about 5,000 more than America has in Syria to fight Isis and approximately one-third the size of the entire Border Patrol force at the US-Mexico line”, reports Vox.
“This is using the troops as props,” said Jason Dempsey, who served as an Army infantry officer in Iraq and Afghanistan and now works at the Center for a New American Security. “We’re using a bunch of people to waste their time while they backstop the Border Patrol.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
That view is shared by Shaw Drake, of the American Civil Liberties Union’s border rights centre at El Paso, Texas. “Sending active military forces to our southern border is not only a huge waste of taxpayer money, but an unnecessary course of action that will further terrorise and militarise our border communities,” said Drake.
Another problem for Trump is that “the military won’t actually be able to participate in detaining or deporting any of the migrants the way the president likely wants”, says Vox.
US law forbids the troops from physically detaining individuals at the border. Instead, they will be permitted only to assist US border officials with tasks such as helping transport border agents and providing emergency medical care to those who need it.
So “while it may be intended to look as if the US is preparing for a massive invasion of immigrants at the southern border”, the reality is that “it’s mostly just sending backup logistical support to help border agents address the arrival of a few thousand migrants who have been travelling by foot for weeks”, concludes Vox.
Despite such limitations, Trump has seized on the caravan at recent rallies ahead of the midterm elections, “hoping the issue will again fire up his core support”, says The Guardian.
“Many Gang Members and some very bad people are mixed into the Caravan heading to our Southern Border,” Trump tweeted on Monday. “Please go back, you will not be admitted into the United States unless you go through the legal process. This is an invasion of our Country and our Military is waiting for you!”
-
The UK’s ‘wallaby boom’Under the Radar The Australian marsupial has ‘colonised’ the Isle of Man and is now making regular appearances on the UK mainland
-
Fast food is no longer affordable to low-income AmericansThe explainer Cheap meals are getting farther out of reach
-
‘The money to fix this problem already exists’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Ted Cruz teases big 2028 movesIN THE SPOTLIGHT The Texas Republican is playing his cards close to his chest, even as others in Washington start looking for hints about the arch-conservative’s future
-
‘It’s ironic in so many ways’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump defends Saudi prince, shrugs off Khashoggi murderSpeed Read The president rebuked an ABC News reporter for asking Mohammed bin Salman about the death of a Washington Post journalist at the Saudi Consulate in 2018
-
Congress passes bill to force release of Epstein filesSpeed Read The Justice Department will release all files from its Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking investigation
-
Trump says he will sell F-35 jets to Saudi ArabiaSpeed Read The president plans to make several deals with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman this week
-
‘Trump’s bad qualities make him good at handling the Middle East’instant opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
The ‘Kavanaugh stop’Feature Activists say a Supreme Court ruling has given federal agents a green light to racially profile Latinos
-
Affordability: Does Trump have an answer?Feature Trump ‘refuses to admit there is a problem’