Immigration: Cameron gets his 'ifs and buts' kicked
Despite a chorus of complaints from senior Tories, PM remains 'defiant' about manifesto target
David Cameron will go into the general election with a renewed pledge to cap net immigration, despite serious doubts being raised by a series of Tory grandees and Cabinet ministers.
The PM has the backing of Home Secretary Theresa May, and both are described as “defiant” by The Times.
Some of their own colleagues would choose another D-word - “daft”, perhaps, or “deluded” – given last week’s figures from the Office for National Statistics showing net immigration had risen to 298,000 a year, the equivalent of a couple of small towns.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In short, a new Tory pledge to cap immigration will have all the credibility of Paul ‘Gazza’ Gascoigne pledging once more to give up drink. You know it’s not going to happen.
But May insists in a Times interview: “It is important because it is about not just dealing with those coming into the system but also about making sure that those people who shouldn’t live here actually leave.”
She refused to say exactly how the target would be expressed in the manifesto – presumably her team is working on a better phrasing than Cameron’s original vow on 14 April 2011 to get it down to “tens of thousands … “no ifs, no buts”.
“You will have to wait for the manifesto to see the exact words,” said May. “The idea of the net migration target will still be there. It will be measured [in the same way].”
May also hinted at reintroducing plans to make visitors from “high-risk” countries pay a bond before they are allowed into Britain and insisting that people should leave while immigration appeals are heard – both of which ideas are opposed by the Lib Dems.
May said every Whitehall department was touched by the burdens that come from soaring immigration - from the NHS and housing to roads and schools. Her message is that the rest of the Cabinet will have to pull their fingers out to make this work.
Cameron is reported to be exasperated with Cabinet colleagues who doubt his and May’s ability to honour a fresh target: “Why on earth are the only people who are really committed to our policy me and Theresa May?”
To which the chorus responds: “Because it’s not going to happen, Prime Minister!”
Lib Dem Business Secretary Vince Cable tells The Times: “It was a target that could never be met because there were so many elements of it that you could never control — the most important of which was EU migrants, but also Brits returning from abroad, and asylum.”
Kenneth Clarke, the former Tory Cabinet minister, says the promise should not be repeated: “It would not be possible to achieve it without damaging our economy.”
David Willetts, the former higher education minister, said Cameron should have used Lib Dem resistance as an excuse to drop it. “I thought it got us off an undeliverable commitment.”
Cameron and May do have one supporter for retaining their apparently undeliverable pledge - the Daily Mail.
In an editorial, the Mail says Cameron needs to grasp that “he and the Home Secretary are far from alone. As successive polls have shown, the public are overwhelmingly behind them. For their sake, the answer to past failure is not to scrap the target, but to meet it.”
Or they can vote UKip.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The Onion is having a very ironic laugh with Infowars
The Explainer The satirical newspaper is purchasing the controversial website out of bankruptcy
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
'Rahmbo, back from Japan, will be looking for a job? Really?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
What's next for electric vehicles under Trump?
Today's Big Question And what does that mean for Tesla's Elon Musk?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The Tamils stranded on 'secretive' British island in Indian Ocean
Under the Radar Migrants 'unlawfully detained' since 2021 shipwreck on UK-controlled Diego Garcia, site of important US military base
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published