3 GOP states sue Biden administration over end of restrictive pandemic border policy


Three Republican-led states on Monday sued the Biden administration over its recently-announced plan to end a policy that allows the U.S. to expeditiously expel migrants at the southern border, The Hill reports.
The suit was filed by Missouri, Arizona, and Louisiana.
The policy in question, known as Title 42, was implemented under former President Donald Trump for public health and COVID-19-related reasons, the Hill writes. The measure is governed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who on Friday announced the order would be coming to an end on May 23.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In the lawsuit, the three GOP states are attempting to block the end of Title 42 by "arguing the [CDC], which issued the order, violated the Administrative Procedures Act by failing to allow for a comment period on its revocation," the Hill writes. Notably, the CDC did not implement the rule using such a rulemaking process; instead, the Trump administration used a so-called "sunset clause," which requires the CDC to review the order's necessity every 60 days. The states also argued in their suit that an end to Title 42 would bring about a large immigration surge with the potential to overwhelm border agents.
"The Termination Order will create an unprecedented surge at the border that will overwhelm Defendants' capacity to enforce immigration laws at the border," the states wrote, per the Hill.
Notably, Title 42 was never intended to be or become official immigration policy; it is simply a public health order, Department of Homeland Security officials have repeatedly commented.
Though critics of the policy celebrated its impending termination, there are nonetheless plenty of people who were upset by the administration's decision. For example, in addition to the suit from Arizona, Missouri, and Louisiana, some belive a challenge out of Texas could be in the works.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Brigid Kennedy worked at The Week from 2021 to 2023 as a staff writer, junior editor and then story editor, with an interest in U.S. politics, the economy and the music industry.
-
Deportations ensnare migrant families, U.S. citizens
Feature Trump's deportation crackdown is sweeping up more than just immigrants as ICE targets citizens, judges and nursing mothers
-
Trump is not sure he must follow the Constitution
speed read When asked about due process for migrants in a TV interview, President Trump said he didn't know whether he had to uphold the Fifth Amendment
-
Trump judge bars deportations under 1798 law
speed read A Trump appointee has ruled that the president's use of a wartime act for deportations is illegal
-
Trump ousts Waltz as NSA, taps him for UN role
speed read President Donald Trump removed Mike Waltz as national security adviser and nominated him as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations
-
Trump blames Biden for tariffs-linked contraction
speed read The US economy shrank 0.3% in the first three months of 2025, the Commerce Department reported
-
'It is not enough to simply defend the status quo'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump says he could bring back Ábgego García but won't
Speed Read At a rally to mark his 100th day in office, the president doubled down on his unpopular immigration and economic policies
-
Canada's Liberals, Carney win national election
Speed Read The party of Prime Minister Mark Carney beat Conservative Pierre Poilievre thanks in part to Trump's trade war