Net neutrality: what is it and does it affect UK web users?
Controversial repeal could lead to more online innovation, but at what cost?
The US-based Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulator will decide today whether to repeal net neutrality regulations dating back to the Obama era.
Ajit Pai, Donald Trump’s FCC chief, has been spearheading the drive to remove net neutrality regulations since May. The idea is to give internet service providers (ISPs) more headroom to innovate, according to The Guardian.
But the paper says the move is an “important step backwards” for democracy, as existing net neutrality rules prevent ISPs from having their online content and services censored and manipulated.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A decision is expected this evening. BBC News says the Democrats have vowed to try to overturn the proposal if Ajit Pai wins.
What is net neutrality?
Net neutrality relates to the openness of the internet and how internet service providers (ISPs) control customer information.
It means that “no ISP should be able to unfairly manipulate your Internet usage or your experience of the web”, The Independent says, especially if it were to damage the functionality of internet services such as Netflix or YouTube.
Rules passed in 2015 by the FFC suggest heavy regulation is required to prevent ISPs from “artificially directing customers to sites and applications they control or with whom they share special business relationships,” says the website.
ISPs must therefore treat all customer data equally, The Guardian reports, with all data sent at the same speed no matter the service. Those using social media sites, for example, would be given the same internet speed as people using bandwidth-heavy services such as Netflix.
The paper says that net neutrality is under fire because the FCC is looking to repeal the net neutrality rules it introduced in 2015 under Barack Obama’s presidency.
While it may seem peculiar that the FCC wants to repeal its own regulations, the Independent says the transition from the Obama to Trump administration has led to the rule rethink.
The 'day of action'
Web users held an online protest on 12 July in a bid to convince the FCC to retain its current set of rules.
The protest, which was dubbed a ‘day of action’ by its originator Battle for the Net, gained a substantial following from internet giants, consumer groups and celebrities.
Campaigners revealed to BBC News that some 80,000 websites and services took part in the coordinated action.
Companies that supported the protest include Amazon, Reddit, Netflix and Twitter. Many of the services created their own form of protest. Reddit, for example, designed a slow-loading logo that demonstrated how outlawing net neutrality could restrict download speeds.
Opponents of the campaign believe that removing net neutrality could increase competition among ISPs, BBC News reports. This might lead to more “innovation” among ISPs, resulting in better online services.
What does all this mean for the UK?
Changes to net neutrality laws in the US are not expected to have any major effects on users outside the country, says BBC News, but they will “further underline the philosophical differences between the American and European approach to digital rights.”
Ed Johnson-Williams, a campaigner at the UK-based Open Rights Group, told Sky News that the EU’s net neutrality rules are “some of the strongest net neutrality protections in the world.”
The UK currently operates under these neutrality rules, he says. The Government will aim to adopt them into its own laws through the Great Repeal Bill when it leaves the EU.
“We’ll have to keep an eye out to see if the net neutrality rules are altered post-Brexit,” says Johnson-Williams.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Magazine solutions - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine printables - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - December 27, 2024 / January 3, 2025
By The Week US Published
-
Why ghost guns are so easy to make — and so dangerous
The Explainer Untraceable, DIY firearms are a growing public health and safety hazard
By David Faris Published
-
Bluesky: the social media platform causing a mass X-odus
The Explainer Social media platform is enjoying a new influx but can it usurp big rivals?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Australia proposes social media ban before age 16
Speed Read Australia proposes social media ban before age 16
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Social media ban: will Australia's new age-based rules actually work?
Talking Point PM Anthony Albanese's world-first proposal would bar children under 16 even if they have parental consent, but experts warn that plan would be ineffective and potentially exacerbate dangers
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
States sue TikTok over children's mental health
Speed Read The lawsuit was filed by 13 states and Washington, D.C.
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The 'loyalty testers' who can check a partner's fidelity
Under The Radar The history of 'honey-trapping goes back a long way'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Elon Musk's X blinks in standoff with Brazil
Speed Read Brazil may allow X to resume operations in the country, as Musk's company agrees to comply with court demand
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Pakistan 'gaslighting' citizens over sudden internet slowdown
Under the Radar Government accused of 'throttling the internet' and spooking businesses with China-style firewall, but minister blames widespread use of VPNs
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Threads turns one: where does the Twitter rival stand?
In the Spotlight Although Threads is reporting 175 million active monthly users, it has failed to eclipse X as a meaningful cultural force
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet, The Week UK Published