Civil service neutrality: is it time for a more politicised Whitehall?
Radical plans to allow political appointees could be the direct result of Dominic Raab’s resignation
The government is considering radical plans to “politicise” the civil service in the wake of the resignation of deputy prime minister and justice secretary Dominic Raab over allegations of bullying.
Writing in The Observer, the government’s adviser on the civil service, Francis Maude, said that Raab’s resignation raised “important issues” on the relationship between ministers and the permanent Whitehall employees tasked with carrying out their policies, and the tension between maintaining impartiality and continuity.
It follows an explosive interview on Friday, in which an unrepentant Raab claimed he had been forced out by a “very small minority of very activist civil servants” who were effectively trying to block reforms they did not like.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
‘More robust and less mealy mouthed’
Maude, a Conservative peer and former Cabinet Office minister, has called for “a much more robust culture, with less groupthink, more rugged disagreement, and the confidence to both offer challenge and to accept it” within Whitehall.
He is expected to report to the prime minister shortly and, crucially, has said “we also need to be more robust and less mealy mouthed about ‘politicisation’.”
Claiming “other systems deal with this better”, he highlighted how permanent civil servants in France have overt political affiliations, while permanent civil servants in ministers’ private offices in Australia are released from the obligations of political impartiality and can even take part in party political activity.
The Observer said Maude’s ideas will cause “deep alarm across Whitehall”, especially coming in the wake of the resignation of Raab on Friday after accusations were upheld that he had bullied officials whom he believed had underperformed.
With many in the Tory party still smarting over the defection of senior civil servant Sue Gray to Labour earlier this year, “the Raab case has highlighted tensions between the need for Conservative ministers to drive policies forward to deliver on their political objectives, and the independence of the civil servants who serve them”, said the paper.
John Oxley for UnHerd said ministers “increasingly talk about ‘the Blob’, and the perception that politically motivated intransigence is used to frustrate their policies”. So the fact “that a minister was ousted through civil servants’ grievances will only add succour to this”.
‘Genuine risk of losing years of knowledge’
Theresa May’s former chief of staff, Nick Timothy, in The Daily Telegraph set out the need to “overhaul our creaking civil service”.
He suggested the civil service should be reduced in size by half, while pay should be doubled, and ministers should be able to appoint the officials who do the work for which they are accountable. “This would improve the retention of the best officials, and help to recruit more experts to serve for chunks of their career,” he claimed. “Alignment between ministers and officials would mean better, swifter delivery.”
It follows proposals by former cabinet minister Liam Fox, also in The Telegraph, for a “hybrid” approach towards political appointees in the civil service that would improve skills, turnover and ultimately impartiality.
Yet this approach carries a “genuine risk”, said Doug McWilliams, an economist who has worked in Whitehall for decades, on Reaction. He argued that while it “might seem attractive to a Tory minister, when faced with what appears to be obstruction, simply to get rid of the top of the civil service and replace it with politicians… would lose years of knowledge.”
He added: “The system only works (in a ramshackle way) in the US because of the importance of state and local governments where apprentice politicians/civil servants can cut their teeth,” he concluded. “In the UK’s largely unitary system, placing those with no administrative experience in charge of departments would make maladministration endemic.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'A new era of hurricanes'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
How Britain's demographic is changing
A 50-year record population increase was fuelled by greater migration
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
The story of Japanese jeweller Tasaki
The Blend A revival in the use of pearls in fashion and jewellery design places heritage brand Tasaki centre stage
By Felix Bischof Published
-
Hyperbole and hatred: can heated rhetoric kill?
Talking Point Hypocrisy and double standards are certainly rife, but the link between heated political language and real-world violence is unclear
By The Week UK Published
-
Men in Gray suits: why the plots against Starmer's top adviser?
Today's Big Question Increasingly damaging leaks about Sue Gray reflect 'bitter acrimony' over her role and power struggle in new government
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Tax plans spell trouble in the North Sea
Talking Point Labour’s tax plans are whipping up a storm. Are the worries of opponents justified?
By The Week UK Published
-
On Leadership: why Tony Blair's new book has divided critics
Talking Point The former Labour leader has created a 'practical guide to good governance' but should Keir Starmer take note?
By The Week Staff Published
-
Who will replace Rishi Sunak as the next Tory leader?
In Depth Shortlist will be whittled down to two later today
By The Week UK Last updated
-
Why did the Secret Service fail to protect Trump?
Talking Point Secret Service under pressure to explain operational failures – and it's not the first time they’ve slipped up
By The Week UK Published
-
Iran: does Masoud Pezeshkian's election mark a turning point?
Talking Point New president is seen as a progressive but much will depend on how the US reacts
By The Week UK Published
-
The Trump immunity ruling: a licence to break the law?
Talking Point 'End of democracy' fears may be overblown, but the Supreme Court verdict is already having a noxious impact
By The Week UK Published