Civil service neutrality: is it time for a more politicised Whitehall?
Radical plans to allow political appointees could be the direct result of Dominic Raab’s resignation
The government is considering radical plans to “politicise” the civil service in the wake of the resignation of deputy prime minister and justice secretary Dominic Raab over allegations of bullying.
Writing in The Observer, the government’s adviser on the civil service, Francis Maude, said that Raab’s resignation raised “important issues” on the relationship between ministers and the permanent Whitehall employees tasked with carrying out their policies, and the tension between maintaining impartiality and continuity.
It follows an explosive interview on Friday, in which an unrepentant Raab claimed he had been forced out by a “very small minority of very activist civil servants” who were effectively trying to block reforms they did not like.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
‘More robust and less mealy mouthed’
Maude, a Conservative peer and former Cabinet Office minister, has called for “a much more robust culture, with less groupthink, more rugged disagreement, and the confidence to both offer challenge and to accept it” within Whitehall.
He is expected to report to the prime minister shortly and, crucially, has said “we also need to be more robust and less mealy mouthed about ‘politicisation’.”
Claiming “other systems deal with this better”, he highlighted how permanent civil servants in France have overt political affiliations, while permanent civil servants in ministers’ private offices in Australia are released from the obligations of political impartiality and can even take part in party political activity.
The Observer said Maude’s ideas will cause “deep alarm across Whitehall”, especially coming in the wake of the resignation of Raab on Friday after accusations were upheld that he had bullied officials whom he believed had underperformed.
With many in the Tory party still smarting over the defection of senior civil servant Sue Gray to Labour earlier this year, “the Raab case has highlighted tensions between the need for Conservative ministers to drive policies forward to deliver on their political objectives, and the independence of the civil servants who serve them”, said the paper.
John Oxley for UnHerd said ministers “increasingly talk about ‘the Blob’, and the perception that politically motivated intransigence is used to frustrate their policies”. So the fact “that a minister was ousted through civil servants’ grievances will only add succour to this”.
‘Genuine risk of losing years of knowledge’
Theresa May’s former chief of staff, Nick Timothy, in The Daily Telegraph set out the need to “overhaul our creaking civil service”.
He suggested the civil service should be reduced in size by half, while pay should be doubled, and ministers should be able to appoint the officials who do the work for which they are accountable. “This would improve the retention of the best officials, and help to recruit more experts to serve for chunks of their career,” he claimed. “Alignment between ministers and officials would mean better, swifter delivery.”
It follows proposals by former cabinet minister Liam Fox, also in The Telegraph, for a “hybrid” approach towards political appointees in the civil service that would improve skills, turnover and ultimately impartiality.
Yet this approach carries a “genuine risk”, said Doug McWilliams, an economist who has worked in Whitehall for decades, on Reaction. He argued that while it “might seem attractive to a Tory minister, when faced with what appears to be obstruction, simply to get rid of the top of the civil service and replace it with politicians… would lose years of knowledge.”
He added: “The system only works (in a ramshackle way) in the US because of the importance of state and local governments where apprentice politicians/civil servants can cut their teeth,” he concluded. “In the UK’s largely unitary system, placing those with no administrative experience in charge of departments would make maladministration endemic.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The future of X
Talking Point Trump's ascendancy is reviving the platform's coffers, whether or not a merger is on the cards
By The Week UK Published
-
The Democrats: time for wholesale reform?
Talking Point In the 'wreckage' of the election, the party must decide how to rebuild
By The Week UK Published
-
What will Trump mean for the Middle East?
Talking Point President-elect's 'pro-Israel stance' could mask a more complex and unpredictable approach to the region
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Netanyahu's gambit: axing his own defence minster
Talking Point Sacking of Yoav Gallant demonstrated 'utter contempt' for Israeli public
By The Week UK Published
-
Should Sonia Sotomayor retire from the Supreme Court?
Talking Points Democrats worry about repeating the history of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Meloni's migration solution: camps in Albania
Talking Point The controversial approach is potentially 'game-changing'
By The Week UK Published
-
US election: why can't Kamala Harris close the deal?
Talking Point For the vice-president to win 'we need less mulling and more action in a do-or-die moment'
By The Week UK Published