What does the Taliban stand for?
Militants tell women to stay at home as radical overhaul gets underway
Women and girls in Afghanistan fear for their rights and safety now that the Taliban has taken control of the capital, Kabul.
In what Channel 4 News calls a “surreal” press conference beamed around the world yesterday, the militants said they will recognise women’s rights, including access to education and employment, within the “framework of Islam”. No violence or prejudice against women will be allowed, they said. “Women are going to be very active in our society.”
“What those promises mean in reality is far less clear,” says Channel 4. Many Afghans fear that women will see themselves stripped of the rights gained since the Taliban last ruled between 1996 and 2001, when they enforced a strict interpretation of sharia law that brutally repressed women.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
As thousands of residents attempt to flee the country, the situation for women in Afghanistan is “terrifying”, writes Vrinda Narain, an associate professor from McGill University in Canada, for The Conversation. The militants’ promises have already been undermined by reports of “women and children being beaten and whipped” on the streets after trying to pass through checkpoints, says The Guardian.
Here are some of the changes that women may experience under the Taliban’s rule.
Return of the burqa
Under the previous Taliban regime failure to wear a burqa could result in severe punishment.
After the fall of the regime in 2001, women could choose whether they wanted to wear the garment. For some, shedding the burqa became “a symbol of a new dawn”, The Guardian reports, with women “able to dictate what they wore for themselves again”.
Now, for some women in Afghanistan, the garment “represents the sudden and devastating loss of rights gained over 20 years”, CNN reports. Many women have been wearing the head-to-toe covering again or shutting themselves in at home in fear and anticipation of new restrictions.
The Taliban has said its policy will be that women wear the hijab, a spokesperson has told the BBC, suggesting they might not have to cover their faces. However, both demand for burqas, and their price, have increased dramatically in the past 12 months, according to market sellers in Afghanistan’s capital. “As the fear among women in Kabul has grown, the prices have risen,” The Guardian explains.
Male ‘guardians’
Women were not allowed to leave their homes without a male relative, or “guardian”, during the previous Taliban regime. Since the insurgent group seized control of Kabul on Sunday, residents in some parts of the city have said that there are “no women walking on the streets”, The Guardian reports.
In July, Afghan news broadcaster Ariana News reported that the Taliban had allegedly told women in occupied areas that they could not leave their homes without a male guardian. A schoolteacher in the Takhar province has told the Associated Press that women have been instructed not to visit the local market alone.
Employment bans
During the late 1990s and early 2000s, women were unable to work under the Taliban regime. There are already reports that female employees have been replaced by male counterparts in some businesses. Writing in The Guardian, an anonymous Kabul resident said that her sister left her desk in a government office last weekend “with tearful eyes”, believing “it was the last day of my job”.
However, Taliban member Enamullah Samangani said yesterday that the regime “doesn’t want women to be victims”, adding that “they should be in the government structure according to sharia- law”.
The i newspaper reports that Afghan TV news stations “have resumed broadcasting with courageous female anchors” despite the Taliban takeover. But experts say the militants’ assurances so far are “nothing more than optics for the West”, says the newspaper. It notes that before 2001, women who broke the rules often “suffered humiliation and public beatings by the Taliban’s religious police, and sometimes death”.
Restrictions on education
Girls were not allowed to receive an education between 1996 and 2001. Pashtana Durrani, executive director of LEARN, a non-profit organisation focused on education in Afghanistan, told NPR that she believes the Taliban “will try to be very open to the idea of education”, but what kind of “educational rights” the regime will actually allow remain unclear.
Taliban spokesman Suhail Shaheen told Sky News that women will be permitted to be educated to university level and that “thousands” of schools remain open in Afghanistan. But a professor in Herat told the Financial Times that security guards outside the university where she works told her “women cannot go in for now”.
Women have in the past been persecuted by the Taliban for running informal lessons and study sessions in their homes. Many Afghans fear the worst, with teachers and students “grappling with what could be the end of education for generations of women and girls in Afghanistan”, Time reports.
Forced ‘marriages’ to Taliban fighters
A statement reportedly issued by the Taliban’s cultural commission last week called for religious leaders to provide the group with a list of girls over the age of 15 and widows under the age of 45 “to be married to Taliban fighters”, The Times of India says.
In The Conversation, Associate Professor Narain writes that “offering ‘wives’ is a strategy aimed at luring militants to join the Taliban”, but the union is a form of “sexual enslavement”. “Forcing women into sexual slavery under the guise of marriage is both a war crime and a crime against humanity,” she says.
Punishments
During the Taliban’s previous reign, “a woman could be flogged for showing an inch or two of skin under her full-body burqa, beaten for attempting to study, stoned to death if she was found guilty of adultery”, Amnesty International reported. There was also a case where women’s fingers were cut off as punishment for wearing nail varnish.
Associated Press reports that girls in the Takhar province last week were stopped and lashed for wearing “revealing sandals”.
The previous Taliban rule was “a bleak period for Afghan women” and while the years since have been ones of much suffering for the country, the treatment of women was at least one “widely recognized bright spot”, says The New York Times.
As the group’s claims that it has changed its ways are met with “deep skepticism”, the paper says the “question now is whether the Taliban’s interpretation of Islamic law will be as draconian as when the group last held power”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Julia O'Driscoll is the engagement editor. She covers UK and world news, as well as writing lifestyle and travel features. She regularly appears on “The Week Unwrapped” podcast, and hosted The Week's short-form documentary podcast, “The Overview”. Julia was previously the content and social media editor at sustainability consultancy Eco-Age, where she interviewed prominent voices in sustainable fashion and climate movements. She has a master's in liberal arts from Bristol University, and spent a year studying at Charles University in Prague.
-
'All too often, we get caught up in tunnel vision'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of legacy media failures
In the Spotlight From election criticism to continued layoffs, the media has had it rough in 2024
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Marty Makary: the medical contrarian who will lead the FDA
In the Spotlight What Johns Hopkins surgeon and commentator Marty Makary will bring to the FDA
By David Faris Published
-
Why Assad fell so fast
The Explainer The newly liberated Syria is in an incredibly precarious position, but it's too soon to succumb to defeatist gloom
By The Week UK Published
-
Romania's election rerun
The Explainer Shock result of presidential election has been annulled following allegations of Russian interference
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russia's shadow war in Europe
Talking Point Steering clear of open conflict, Moscow is slowly ratcheting up the pressure on Nato rivals to see what it can get away with.
By The Week UK Published
-
Cutting cables: the war being waged under the sea
In the Spotlight Two undersea cables were cut in the Baltic sea, sparking concern for the global network
By The Week UK Published
-
The nuclear threat: is Vladimir Putin bluffing?
Talking Point Kremlin's newest ballistic missile has some worried for Nato nations
By The Week UK Published
-
Russia vows retaliation for Ukrainian missile strikes
Speed Read Ukraine's forces have been using U.S.-supplied, long-range ATCMS missiles to hit Russia
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
Today's Big Question 'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Cuba's energy crisis
The Explainer Already beset by a host of issues, the island nation is struggling with nationwide blackouts
By Rebekah Evans, The Week UK Published